Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:35:50.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aesthetic Strategies of Trance-gression: The Politics of Bodily Scenes of Ecstasy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2019

Sabine Huschka
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Choreographic bodies are empowered by modes of expansion and transgression. Focusing on the energetic processes that lead to such empowerment, this article discusses the perceptual politics of trancelike scenes in the work of contemporary European choreographers and performers. As a body-mobilizing choreographic strategy of out-of-body and out-of-mind experiences, trance is closely linked to critical and utopian ideas, bodily transgressions, and crossed boundaries. While Mary Wigman treats trance as an incantation which contains the powers that it unleashes, contemporary choreographers like Doris Uhlich or Meg Stuart, expose the body to powers that nearly disintegrate it. As opposed to Wigman-style modernism, contemporary dance stages movement as a tremendous event that exposes performers and audiences to experiences of transgression.

Keywords

ecstasycontemporary dancetransgressionenergetic processesperceptual politicsDoris UhlichMeg Stuart
Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , August 2019 , pp. 4 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Dance Studies Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barck, Karlheinz, ed. 2005. Ästhetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Wörterbuch. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Böhme, Hartmut, and Huschka, Sabine. 2009. ‘‘Prolog.” In Wissenskultur Tanz, edited by Huschka, Sabine, 7–22. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar
Brandstetter, Gabriele. 1995. Tanz-Lektüren. Körperbilder und Raumfiguren der Avantgarde. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Broughton, Frank, and Brewster, Bill. 2002. How to DJ (properly): The Art and Science of Playing Records. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Butler, Mark Jonathan. 2006. Unlocking the Groove: Rhythm, Meter, and Musical Design in Electronic Dance Music. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Bonnie Bainbridge. 1993. Sensing, Feeling, and Action: The Experiential Anatomy of Body-Mind-Centering. Northampton, MA: Contact Editions.Google Scholar
Feustel, Robert. 2013. Grenzgänge: Kulturen des Rauschs seit der Renaissance. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Feustel, Robert. 2016. ‘‘Die Zeit des Rausches.” In Rausch Trance Ekstase. Zur Kultur psychischer Ausnahmezustände, edited by Schetsche, Michael and Schmidt, Renate-Berenike, 33–50. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2005. Theatre, Sacrifice, Ritual: Exploring Forms of Political Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited and translated by Bouchard, Donald F.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell.Google Scholar
Frembgen, Jürgen Wasim. 2011. “Lal Shahbaz Qalandar (gest. 1274) und die Bewegung der Qalandar-Derwische. Ich weiss nichts ausser Liebe, Rausch und Ekstase.” In Mystik. Die Sehnsucht nach dem Absoluten, edited by Lutz, Albert and App, Urs, 156–161. Exhibition catalog, 23 September 2011–15 January 2012, Museum Rietberg. Zürich: Scheidegger & Spiess.Google Scholar
Frembgen, Jürgen Wasim. 2016. “’Manchmal tanze ich auf Dornen!’ Ekstase und Trance im Sufi-Islam.” In Rausch Trance Ekstase. Zur Kultur psychischer Ausnahmezustände, edited by Schetsche, Michael and Schmidt, Renate-Berenike, 157–175. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar
Gödde, Susanne. 2011. “’Fremde Nähe.’ Zur mythologischen Differenz des Dionysos.” In A Different God? Dionysos and Ancient Polytheism, edited by Schlesier, Renate, 85–104. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huschka, Sabine. 2016. “Rausch und Ekstase als choreographische KörperSzene.” In Rausch Trance Ekstase. Zur Kultur psychischer Ausnahmezustände, edited by Schetsche, Michael and Schmidt, Renate-Berenike, 217–237. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.Google Scholar
Inter-University Center for Dance Berlin (HZT Berlin). 2016. “DFG-Project Transgressions.“ Accessed April 3, 2017. http://www.hzt-berlin.de/?z=5&p=149&lan=en.Google Scholar
Köpping, Klaus-Peter. 1997. ‘‘Ekstase.” In Vom Menschen. Handbuch Historische Anthropologie, edited by Wulf, Christoph, 548–568. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar
Martin, Randy. 1998. Critical Moves. Dance Studies in Theory and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mathei, Dennis. 2012. Oh my god – it's techno music! Definition und Abgrenzung des Technostils unter Berücksichtigung historischer, stilistischer und soziologischer Aspekte. Osnabrück, Germany: Electronic Publishing.Google Scholar
Matthias, Sebastian. 2014. ‘‘Groove relations. Bewegungsqualitäten als Ordnungsstruktur partizipativer Versammlungen in Clubtanz und zeitgenössischer Choreographie.” In Versammlung und Teilhabe. Urbane Öffentlichkeiten und performative Künste, edited by Burri, Regula Valérie, Evert, Kerstin, Peters, Sibylle, Pilkington, Esther, and Ziemer, Gesa, 51–73. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar
Natale, Frank. 1993. Trance dance: der Tanz des Lebens – Geschichte, Rituale, Erfahrungen. Berlin: Simon + Leutner.Google Scholar
Philipp, Michael, Bierl, Anton, and Knoll, Kordelia. 2013. Dionysos – Rausch und Ekstase. Exhibition Catalog, October 3, 2013–January 12, 2014, Bucerius Kunst Forum. München: Hirmer.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Dee. 2007. Rhythmic Subject: Uses of Energy in the Dances of Mary Wigman, Martha Graham and Merce Cunningham. Alton, UK: Hampshire.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, Lucia. 2015. “Gesture, Interruption, Vibration: Rethinking Early Twentieth-Century Gestural Theory and Practice in Walter Benjamin, Rudolf von Laban, and Mary Wigman.” Dance Research Journal 47 (2): 23–42.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1991. ‘‘Die Verflechtung von Unterhaltung und Wirksamkeit.” In Texte zur Theorie des Theaters, edited by Lazarowicz, Klaus and Balme, Christopher, 663–672. Stuttgart, Germany: Reclam.Google Scholar
Schlesier, Renate. 2011. “Der bakchische Gott.” In A Different God? Dionysos and Ancient Polytheism, edited by Schlesier, Renate, 173–202. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schrödl, Jenny. 2005. “Energie.” In Metzler Lexikon Theatertheorie, edited by Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Kolesch, Doris, and Warstat, Matthias, 87–90. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Siegmund, Gerald. 2016. “Mobilization, Force, and the Politics of Transformation.” Dance Research Journal 48 (3): 27–32.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process. Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 2009. Vom Ritual zum Theater. Der Ernst des menschlichen Spiels. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Uhlich, Doris. n.d. “Boom Bodies.” Accessed April 3, 2017. http://www.dorisuhlich.at/en/projects/31-boom-bodies.Google Scholar
Uhlich, Doris. n.d. “Ravemachine.” Accessed June 26, 2019. https://www.dorisuhlich.at/en/projects/30-ravemachine.Google Scholar
Uhlich, Doris. n.d. “Universal Dancer.” Accessed April 3, 2017. http://www.dorisuhlich.at/en/projects/4-universal-dancer.Google Scholar
Vitos, Botond. 2017. “The Dance Floor Experiment: Researching the Mediating Technologies and Embodied Experiences of Electronic Dance Music Events.” Popular Music and Society 40 (2): 131–150.Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernhard. 2002. Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Phänomenologie, Psychoanalyse, Phänomenotechnik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Warstat, Matthias. 2013. “Rausch und Rahmen. Liminale Erfahrungen im Theater.” In Lust, Rausch und Ekstase: Grenzgänge der Ästhetischen Bildung, edited by Liebau, Eckart and Zirfas, Jörg, 107–125. Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar
Wigman, Mary. 1986a. “Das Tanzerlebnis.” In Mary Wigman – Ein Vermächtnis, edited by Sorell, Walter, 154–156. Wilhelmshaven, Germany: Noetzel & Heinrichshofen.Google Scholar
Wigman, Mary. 1986b. “Drehmonotonie.” In Die Sprache des Tanzes, by Wigman, Mary, 37–42. Stuttgart: Battenberg.Google Scholar
Wittmann, Gabriele, Scheidl, Sylvia, and Siegmund, Gerald. 2011. “Lance Gries – Release and Alignment Oriented Techniques.” In Dance Techniques 2010 – Tanzplan Germany, edited by Diehl, Ingo and Lampert, Friederike, 269–95. Leipzig, Germany: Henschel.Google Scholar
Wittrock, Eike. 2010. “Kritische Zustände. Ekstase-Darstellungen in Choreografien von Mary Wigman, Yasmeen Godder und Jeremy Wade.” kritische berichte 4: 17–27.Google Scholar