¹ Hindustan Times (New Delhi), 11 16, 1970.Google Scholar

² Lipset, S. M., ‘Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy’, American Political Science Review, 53 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Coleman, James, ‘Conclusion: The Political Systems of the Developing Areas’, in Almond, G. A. and Coleman, J. S. (eds.), The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton, 1960), pp. 532–76Google Scholar; Cutright, Philips, ‘National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis’, American Sociological Review, 28 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Eric A. Nordlinger has argued that ‘the probabilities of a political system's developing in a non-violent, non-authoritarian and eventually democratically viable manner are maximized when a national identity emerges first, followed by the institutionalization of the central government, and then by the emergence of mass parties and a mass electorate’. In ‘Political Development: Time Sequence and Rates of Change’, World Politics (April, 1968).

⁴ Huntington, Samuel P., ‘Political Development and Political Decay’, World Politics (04, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Eisenstadt, S. N., ‘Bureaucracy and Political Development’, in LaPalambra, Joseph (ed.), Bureaucracy and Political Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963), p. 99.Google Scholar

⁶ Sharma, K. L., ‘Modernisation and Rural Stratification’, Economic and Political Weekly (Bombay), September 12, 1970.Google Scholar

⁷ Kuthiala, S. K., ‘Impact of Factory Production on Traditional Societies: Modernization, Some Alternative Views on India’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. XXII, No. 2.Google Scholar

⁸ Shamasastry, R., Evolution of Indian Polity (Mysore: M. S. Srinivas, 1962, 2nd ed.), p. 178.Google Scholar

⁹ Cited by Sinha, H. N., The Development of Indian Polity (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1963), p. 165.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Brown, D. Mackenzie, ‘Traditional Concept of Leadership’, in Park, Richard and Tinker, Irene (eds.), Leadership and Political Institutions in India (Madras: Oxford University Press, 1960), p. 80.Google Scholar

¹¹ Bhambri, C. P., A Primer of Hindu Polity (Meerut: Loyal Book Depot, 1969), p. 32.Google Scholar

¹² Cohen, Stephen, ‘Rulers and Priests: A Study in Cultural Control’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 6 (1963–1964).Google Scholar

¹³ Das, Durga, India From Curzon to Nehru and After, p. 333.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Dutt, R. Palme, India—Today and Tomorrow (New Delhi: People's Publishing House, 1955), p. 218.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Mahendra, K. C., The Politics of Privy Purses (Ludhiana: Kalyani Publishers, 1971), p. 10.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Weiner, Myron, ‘Congress Party Elite’, in Eisenstadt, S. N., (ed.) Political Sociology—A Reader (New York: Basic Books, 1970).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Langton, Kenneth P., Political Socialisation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 5.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Menon, V. P., The Story of the Integration of the Indian States (Bombay: Orient Longmans Ltd., 1956), p. 281.Google Scholar

¹⁹ LeVine, Robert, ‘Political Socialisation and Culture Change’, in Geertz, Clifford, (ed.) Old Societies and New States (New York: The Free Press, 1963), p. 280. In a letter to the Editor of the Times of India, New Delhi, the Governor-General of the Concord of Princes, the Maharaja of Baroda, wrote: ‘My object in writing to you is that the Princes today do not think themselves as being clad in any regal glory or bearing the aura of past dignity.’Google Scholar

²⁰ Weber, Max, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, (eds.), From Max Weber (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1970), p. 296.Google Scholar

²¹ Rustow, D. A. and Ward, Robert, (eds.), Political Modernisation in Japan and Turkey (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964), p. 7.Google Scholar

²² Geertz, Clifford, ‘Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States’, in Geertz, , (ed.), Old Societies and New States, pp. 109–20.Google Scholar

²³ Apter, David, ‘The Role of Traditionalism in the Political Modernisation of Ghana and Uganda’, World Politics (10, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁴ Huntington, Samuel P., ‘The Change to Change: Modernization, Development and Polities’. Comparative Politics, Vol. 3, No. 3 (04, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁵ Handa, R. L., History of Freedom Struggle in Princely States (New Delhi: Central News Agency, 1968), p. 318.Google Scholar

²⁶ Mesthene, Emmanuel G., Technological Change—Its Impact on Man and Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970), p. 47.Google Scholar

²⁷ Weiner, Myron, ‘Political Integration and Political Development’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (03, 1965).Google Scholar

²⁸ Gusfield, Joseph R., ‘Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 72, No. 4 (01, 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brigitte Berger observes that even an irrational ideology can be used for rational purpose, that is, for the transformation of traditional structures into the form of rationality, in Societies in Change (New York: Basic Books, 1971), p. 25.Google Scholar

²⁹ Cited by Dutt, Palme, op. cit., p. 221.Google Scholar

³⁰ Krishana, Daya, ‘Democracy and Traditional Indian values’, in Varma, B. N., (ed.). Contemporary India (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1964), p. 127.Google Scholar

³¹ Huntington, Samuel P., ‘Political Development and Decay’, World Politics (04, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³² Eisenstadt, S. N., ‘Sociological aspects of Political Developments in New States’, in Essays on Sociological Aspects of Political and Economic Development (Hague: Mouton & Co., 1961), pp. 39–40Google Scholar. Rustow, Dankwart A. also maintains that ‘the disruptive effects of its (democracy) sudden introduction have often been underestimated’, see A World of Nations (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1967), pp. 117–19.Google Scholar