Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:13:09.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Non-Emendations in Ovid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

George Doig
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin

Extract

In view of the overwhelming weight of the manuscript evidence, including most recently the testimony of Y, it is perhaps about time to stop the attempts at emendation that began in the sixteenth century with sed non blanda puto. The weaknesses, too, of the argument in favour of lengthening metri gratia the final vowel of blanda have been clearly pointed out by Housman,1 who just as clearly pointed out that blanda must therefore be an ablative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 C.Q. xxi (1927), 113.Google Scholar

1 My distinguished colleague F. W. Lenz, as he kindly informed me, has similarly felt something from anteeat to be naturally understood in the first part. He, however, understands anteiens, retaining desine as the main verb. His note appears in Mnemosyne xix (1966), 389.Google Scholar