No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Authorship of the Culex.1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
The object of the following paper is to examine in detail the relations between the contents of the poem called the Culex and the acknowledged writings of Virgil. The reader will find that these relations are more numerous and far more intimate than has hitherto been pointed out. They seem to warrant an inference as to the authorship of the poem, which in itself may claim high probability, and which when combined with the external evidence appears to the present writer to reach the level of a practical certainty. In what follows, all statements as to the readings of the manuscripts are based upon Professor A. E. Housman's paper on The Apparatus Criticus of the Culex(Cambridge Philological Society Transactions, Vol. VI, Part I, 1908), unless other authorities are expressly cited. I have followed Professor Ellis's text, except where Professor Housman's evidence makes some other reading more probable.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1911
References
page 164 note 1 Also Leo in his edition of the Culex, p. r6.
page 164 note 2 For statistics of the number of elisions in different writers, Skutsch, v., Frühzeit, Aus Vergil's, p. 130. For further evidence on this point, and on the correspondence of ictus and accent in the last three feet of the hexameter, v.Professor Hardie's, W. R. article in the Journal of Philology, Vol. XXX., No. 60, p. 266.Google Scholar
page 164 note 3 Skutsch, Aus Vergil's Frühzeit, p. I34.
page 165 note 1 This line we may, without hesitation, consider Virgilian.
page 167 note 1 Feruent is Professor Ellis's conjecture for the fuerint of the MSS.
page 169 note 1 Some have been already pointed out. See § 3 (c) and (d); § 5 Culex, 11. I57 and r53.
page 173 note 1 The MSS. here vary between nomina and numina.