^{page 57 note 1} Turyn's symbol ρ, called π in A. Dain's Budé apparatus.

^{page 57 note 2} C.Q. N.S. xvii. i (1967), 52–79.Google Scholar

^{page 57 note 3} Turyn's symbol λ. Λ, the Leiden palimpsest, is Dain's P.

^{page 57 note 4} Studies in the Manuscript Tradition of the Tragedies of SophoclesGoogle Scholar (Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, vol. xxxvi, nos. 1–2) pp. 109–24.Google Scholar

^{page 58 note 1} Dawe, R. D., The Collation and Investigation of Manuscripts of Aeschylus, pp. 56, 144 sq.Google Scholar

^{page 59 note 1} Dietz, H. P., Thomas Magistros' Recension of the Sophoclean Plays Oed. Col., Trach., Phil., Diss. Illinois, 1965, p. 116.Google Scholar

^{page 59 note 2} Cf. 1443, where G's marginal suggestion implies that someone had been thinking hard about the passage.

^{page 60 note 1} Or the other way round: accidentally becomes then is omitted to reduce the line to the right number of syllables.

^{page 60 note 2} Cf. Ajax 14, 74, 91, U2, 757, 771, 1222.

^{page 61 note 1}

^{page 62 note 1} Journal of Philology xvi (1888), 116.Google Scholar

^{page 63 note 1} Op. cit., p. 134.Google Scholar

^{page 63 note 2} Gnomon xxxiii (1961), 546.Google Scholar

^{page 65 note 1} i.e. Thoman manuscripts: the evidence for these is quoted from Dietz, , op. cit., pp. 112–24.Google Scholar

^{page 78 note *}

^{page 82 note *} Hoc verbum omittit Dain

Note. Professor D. L. Page, Professor H. Lloyd-Jones, and Dr. R. D. Dawe have all very kindly read this paper and I am grateful for their criticisms; I am also much indebted to Miss M. M. B. Hickey and Father M. Aubineau, who have verified some doubtful readings for me.