Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:43:53.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Doing the Work of Science”: Tibetan Environmentalists and the Changing Dynamics of Ecological Conservation in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Tsering Bum Open the ORCID record for Tsering Bum [Opens in a new window]
Tsering Bum*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Social Development, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of China's “Constructing ecological civilization” initiative, Tibetan environmentalists are proactively incorporating ecological science into their wildlife conservation efforts. This ethnographic study explores the logics, rationales and motivations behind this approach among Tibetans in Qinghai province. The article contends that Tibetan environmentalists adopt ecological science to gain legibility in the eyes of both the state and the wider environmental conservation community, thereby enhancing their political legitimacy and social recognition. On one hand, this practice counters the stigmatizing narratives that depict Tibetan pastoralists as backward. By embracing scientific discourses and practices, they challenge such derogatory views and position themselves as forward-thinking conservationists. On the other hand, this strategy indirectly preserves the traditional knowledge of pastoralists. Through their involvement with ecological science, they merge traditional insights with scientific methodologies, ensuring the protection of their cultural heritage while adapting to the sociopolitical landscape of contemporary conservation dynamics in China.

摘要

摘要

在中国推进生态文明建设的大背景下，藏族环保者正在主动将生态科学整合进其野生动植物保护工作之中。这项人类学研究旨在探讨青海藏族采纳此种做法的逻辑、理念及动机。本文主张，藏族环保者通过引入生态科学，旨在获得国家及更广泛环保共同体的易读性，进而增强其政治正当性和社会地位。一方面，该做法反驳了那些将藏族牧民刻画为落后的叙述。通过采纳科学话语与实践，他们挑战了这种贬低的观点，并将自己定位为具备前瞻性的保护者。另一方面，这一策略也间接地维护了牧民的传统知识。他们通过融入生态科学，将传统见解与科学方法相融合，既保护了文化遗产，又适应了当代中国生态保护的社会现状与政治语境。

Keywords

Tibetan environmentalistspastoralistsecological scienceecological conservationlegibility藏族环保者牧民生态科学生态保护易读性
Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , First View , pp. 1 - 16
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS University of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, Arun. 2005a. Environmentality: Technology of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, Arun. 2005b. “Environmentality: community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India.” Current Anthropology 46(2), 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arantes, Virginie. 2024. “Towards a green nationalism with Chinese characteristics?” The Journal of Contemporary China 33(145), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aswani, Shankar, Lemahieu, Anne and Sauer, Warwick H.H.. 2018. “Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications.” PLOS ONE 13(4), e0195440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Star, Susan Leigh. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Peter. 2007. “Green subjection: the politics of neoliberal urban environmental management.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31(3), 616–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, Tapoja. 2012. Learning to Protect: Environmental Education in a South Indian Tiger Reserve. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, Tapoja. 2017. “Environmental cosmopolitanism in a South Indian village.” Critique of Anthropology 37(4), 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Julie Y. 2010. Cosmologies of Credit: Transnational Mobility and the Politics of Destination in China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cueto, Marcos. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doshi, Sapana. 2019. “Greening displacements, displacing green: environmental subjectivity, slum clearance, and the embodied political ecologies of dispossession in Mumbai.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 43(1), 112–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, James. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaerrang, . 2015. “Housing projects in the nomadic areas of China's eastern Tibetan Plateau: representation, market logic, and governmentality.” Nomadic Peoples 19(2), 261–280.Google Scholar
Gayley, Holly. 2013. “Reimagining Buddhist ethics on the Tibetan Plateau.” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20(1), 248–286.Google Scholar
Geall, Sam, and Ely, Adrian. 2018. “Narratives and pathways towards an ecological civilization in contemporary China.” The China Quarterly 236, 1175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 2022. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gyal, Huatse. 2015. “The politics of standardising and subordinating subjects: the nomadic resettlement project in Tibetan areas of Amdo.” Nomadic Peoples 19, 241–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Xiao, and Sheng, Jichuan. 2023. “Governing the future through ‘ecological civilization’: anticipatory politics and China's great Yangtze River protection programme.” Journal of Contemporary China. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2232747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Mette H., Hongtao Li, Rune Svarverud, . 2018. “Ecological civilization: interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future.” Global Environmental Change 53, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, K. David. 2007. When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World's Languages and the Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, Jude, and Duckett, Jane. 2019. “Reassessing the Hu–Wen era: a golden age or lost decade for social policy in China?” The China Quarterly 237, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinba, Tenzin. 2013. In the Land of the Eastern Queendom: The Politics of Gender and Ethnicity on the Sino-Tibetan Border. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Jinba, Tenzin. 2017. “Seeing like borders: convergence zone as a post-Zomian model.” Current Anthropology 58(5), 551–575.Google Scholar
Klein, Jakob A. 2015. “Eating green: ecological food consumption in urban China.” In Ok, Kim Kwang (ed.), Re-Orienting Cuisine: East Asian Foodways in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Berghahn, 238–262.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Tania Murray. 2014. Land's End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maffi, Luisa. 2005. “Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34, 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makley, Charlene E. 2013. “The politics of presence: voice, deity possession, and dilemmas of development among Tibetans in the People's Republic of China.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55(3), 665–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makley, Charlene E. 2014. “The amoral other: state-led development and mountain deity cults among Tibetans in Amdo Rebgong.” In Yeh, Emily T. and Coggins, Chris (ed.), Mapping Shangrila: Contested Landscapes in the Sino-Tibetan Borderlands. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 229–254.Google Scholar
Makley, Charlene. 2018. The Battle for Fortune: State-led Development, Personhood, and Power Among Tibetans in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meek, Barbra A. 2012. We Are Our Language: An Ethnography of Language Revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Moseley, Robert K., and Mullen, Renée B.. 2014. “The nature conservancy in Shangrila: transnational conservation and its critiques.” In Yeh, Emily T. and Coggins, Chris (ed.), Mapping Shangrila: Contested Landscapes in the Sino-Tibetan Borderlands. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 129–152.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Justin, and Wynne, Derek. 2017. From the Margins to the Centre: Cultural Production and Consumption in the Post-industrial City. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rippa, Alessandro, and Oakes, Tim. 2023. “Infrastructural thinking in China: a research agenda.” The China Quarterly 255, 547–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, Gerald. 2022. “The necropolitics of language oppression.” Annual Review of Anthropology 51, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenbiker, Jesse. 2023. Ecological States: Politics of Science and Nature in Urbanizing China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruddick, Sue. 2015. “Situating the Anthropocene: planetary urbanization and the anthropological machine.” Urban Geography 36(8), 1113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salimjan, Guldana. 2021. “Naturalized violence: affective politics of China's ‘ecological civilization’ in Xinjiang.” Human Ecology 49(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Segi, Shio. 2013. “The making of environmental subjectivity in managing marine protected areas: a case study from southeast Cebu.” Human Organization 72(4), 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 2019. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stamm, B. Hudnall, Stamm, Henry E., Hudnall, Amy C. and Higson-Smith, Craig. 2004. “Considering a theory of cultural trauma and loss.” Journal of Loss and Trauma 9(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thurston, Timothy. 2018. “A careful village: comedic dialogues and linguistic modernity in China's Tibet.” The Journal of Asian Studies 77(2), 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilt, Bryan. 2009. Struggling for Sustainability in Rural China: Environmental Values and Civil Society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verran, Helen. 2001. Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Weiye, He, Suyuan and Liu, Jinlong. 2023. “Understanding environmental governance in China through the green shield action campaign.” Journal of Contemporary China. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2023.2244893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Zongming, Song, Kaishan and Hu, Liangjun. 2010. “China's largest scale ecological migration in the Three-River Headwater region.” AMBIO 39(5–6), 443–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiao, Liangang, and Zhao, Rongqin. 2017. “China's new era of ecological civilization.” Science 358(6366), 1008–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeh, Emily T. 2013. “Blazing pelts and burning passions: nationalism, cultural politics, and spectacular decommodification in Tibet.” The Journal of Asian Studies 72(2), 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Emily T. 2014a. “The rise and fall of the green Tibetan: contingent collaborations and the vicissitudes of harmony.” In Yeh, Emily T. and Coggins, Chris (ed.), Mapping Shangrila: Contested Landscapes in the Sino-Tibetan Borderlands. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 255–278.Google Scholar
Yeh, Emily T. 2014b. “Reverse environmentalism: contemporary articulations of Tibetan culture, Buddhism and environmental protection.” In Miller, James, Yu, Dan Smyer and van der Veer, Peter (eds.), Religion and Ecological Sustainability in China. London: Routledge, 194–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Emily T. 2023. “The making of natural infrastructure in China's era of ecological civilization.” The China Quarterly 255, 611–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, Emily T., and Gaerrang, . 2021. “Pests, keystone species, and hungry ghosts: the Gesar epic and human-pika relations on the Tibetan Plateau.” Cultural Geographies 28(3), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Li. 2020. Anxious China: Inner Revolution and Politics of Psychotherapy. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar