No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Parenting Resource and Management: a primary prevention program for first-time parents
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2016
Abstract
Parenting Resource and Management (PRAM), a primary prevention program for first-time parents, was initiated in Melbourne in 1986. It was an adaptation of the American program, Minnesota Early Learning Design (MELD), utilising non-professional couples as leaders who were selected, trained and supported by professionals. The advantages of this program included cost effectiveness, a self-help emphasis and involvement of both parents. Difficulties in establishing the program will be discussed. The program was proactive, and intensive publicity to generate interest was required. Anonymous evaluation reports from the participants indicated a positive response, recognising that the program filled a significant gap in the existing community support structures.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
Avis, W.
Turner, J. & Noh, S.
1986, ‘Screening for Problem Parenting: Preliminary Evidence on a Promising Instrument’ in Child Abuse and Neglect. 10(2), USA, pp. 157–170.Google Scholar
Bandura, A.
1976, ‘Social Learning Theory’, in Behavioural Approaches to Therapy, eds Spence, J.
Carson, R. & Thibant, J, General Learning Press, New Jersey, p. 5.Google Scholar
Bandura, A.
1969, Principles of Behaviour Modification, Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Beck, D.
1975, ‘Research Findings on the Outcomes of Marital Counselling’ in Social Casework, 56(3), pp. 153–181.Google Scholar
Caplan, G.
1961, An Approach to Community Mental Health, Tavistock Publications, Great Britain, p. 18.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. & Viney, L.
1979, The Primary Prevention of Illness — a Psychological Perspective’ in Australian Psychologist, 14(1), pp. 7–21.Google Scholar
Danish, S. & D'Augelli, A.
1980, ‘Life Development Intervention’, in Competence and Coping During Adulthood, eds Bond, L. & Rosen, J., University Press of New England, London, pp. 114–115.Google Scholar
Durlack, J.
1979, ‘Comparative Effectiveness of Para Professional and Professional Helpers’ in Psychological Bulletin, 66, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar
Eastman, M. (1983) ‘Education for Family Life, a Survey of Available Programs and their Evaluation’ in Occasional Paper, No. 4., Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 43–53.Google Scholar
Fein, R.
1976, ‘The First Weeks of Fathering: The Importance of Choices and Supports for New Parents’ in Birth and the Family Journal, 3(2), pp. 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., Cutler, C., Dean, J., Kempe, H.
1977, ‘Prediction and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect’ in Child Abuse and Neglect International Journal, 1(1), p. 45.Google Scholar
Larson, C.
1980, ‘Efficacy of Prenatal and Post Partum Home Visits on Child Health and Development’ in Pediatrics, 66(2), pp. 191–197.Google Scholar
Lasch, C.
1977, Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Rioch, M.
1966, ‘Changing Concepts in the Training of Therapists’ in Journal of Consulting Psychology, 30, pp. 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, C.
1985, ‘Parent Group Education: A Review of Comparative Studies’ in Australian Journal of Sex, Marriage and Family, 6(1), pp. 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B., Kaban, B. and Attanuci, J.
1979, The Origins of Human Competence, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Zax, M. & Specter, G.
1974, An Introduction to Community Psychology, Wiley & Sons, U.S.A. p. 368.Google Scholar