Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T01:27:20.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Sheaf of Division Rings*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

George Szeto
George Szeto*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois61606
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

R. Arens and I. Kaplansky ([1]) call a ring A biregular if every two sided principal ideal of A is generated by a central idempotent and a ring A strongly regular if for any a in A there exists b in A such that a=a2b. In ([1], Sections 2 and 3), a lot of interesting properties of a biregular ring and a strongly regular ring are given. Some more properties can also be found in [3], [5], [8], [9] and [13]. For example, J. Dauns and K. Hofmann ([3]) show that a biregular ring A is isomorphic with the global sections of the sheaf of simple rings A/K where K are maximal ideals of A. The converse is also proved by R. Pierce ([9], Th. 11–1). Moreover, J. Lambek ([5], Th. 1) extends the above representation of a biregular ring to a symmetric module.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , February 1975 , pp. 727 - 731
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1975

Footnotes

†

The author wishes to thank the referee for his valuable comments and suggestions.

*

This work was supported from the National Science Foundation Grant GU-3320.

References

1. Arens, R. and Kaplansky, I., Topological representation of algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 63(1949), 457–481.Google Scholar
2. Auslander, M. and Goldman, O., The Brauer group of a commutative ring, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 97 (1960), 367–409.Google Scholar
3. Dauns, J. and Hofmann, K. H., The representation of biregular rings by sheaves, Math. Zeitschr., 91 (1966), 103–123.Google Scholar
4. DeMeyer, F. and Ingraham, E., Separable algebras over commutative rings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Lambek, J., On the representation of modules by sheaves of factor modules, Can. Math. Bull., 14 (1971), 359–368.Google Scholar
6. Magid, A., Pierce’s representation and separable algebras, III. J. Math., 15 (1971), 114–121.Google Scholar
7. Magid, A., The separable closure of some commutative rings, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 170 (1972), 109–124.Google Scholar
8. Pierce, R., Modules over commutative regular rings, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc, 70, 1967.Google Scholar
9. Roos, J. E., Locally distributive spectral categories and strongly regular rings, Midwest category seminar report, 1967, #47, 156–181.Google Scholar
10. Szeto, G., On a class of projective modules over central separable algebras II, Can. Math. Bull., 15(1972), 411–416.Google Scholar
11. Szeto, G., On the Wedderburn theorem, Can. J. Math., 3 (1973), 525–530.Google Scholar
12. Villamayor, O. and Zelinsky, D., Galois theory for rings with infinitely many idempotents, Nagoya J. Math., 35 (1969), 83–98.Google Scholar
13. Vrabec, J., Adjoining a unit to a biregular ring, Math Ann., 188 (1970), 219–226.Google Scholar