Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:14:25.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A minimax inequality for inscribed cones revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2023

Zokhrab Mustafaev*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston–Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1993, E. Lutwak established a minimax inequality for inscribed cones of origin symmetric convex bodies. In this work, we re-prove Lutwak’s result using a maxmin inequality for circumscribed cylinders. Furthermore, we explore connections between the maximum volume of inscribed double cones of a centered convex body and the minimum volume of circumscribed cylinders of its polar body.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Mathematical Society

1 Introduction

Let K be an origin symmetric convex body, and let u be a unit vector in ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ . Throughout the paper, it will be assumed that $d\geq 3$ . Let $C(K, u)$ be the unbounded cylinder circumscribed about K (i.e., the union of all lines parallel to u and intersecting K) generated by u. We define $K(u)$ to be a compact circumscribed cylinder of K obtained from $C(K, u)$ which is bounded by the two parallel supporting hyperplanes of K at the intersection of $l_{u}$ (i.e., 1-subspace parallel to u) with the boundary of K. We can select these two parallel supporting hyperplanes of K perpendicular to $l_{u}$ if hyperplanes are not uniquely defined. As Petty [Reference Petty12] pointed out, $K(u)$ has the minimum volume among all compact cylinders obtained from $C(K, u)$ and contain K. Petty [Reference Petty12] proved the following maxmin inequality for $K(u)$ :

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(K|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(K\cap l_{u})}{\lambda(K)}\geq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}},\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if K is an ellipsoid (see also [Reference Bezdek and Lángi2, Reference Horváth and Lángi6, Reference Martini and Mustafaev10, Reference Rogers and Shephard14] for all convex bodies).

A characterization of those K for which the quantity $\lambda _{d-1}(K|u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(K\cap l_{u})\lambda ^{-1}(K)$ a constant for all $u\in S^{d-1}$ is still an open question of convex geometry (see [Reference Petty13]). However, it has been conjectured that ellipsoids are only convex bodies with such a property.

For a given unit vector u, one can also construct the inscribed cone of maximal volume with base $K\cap u^{\perp }$ and apex in K. The apex of such a cone is a point of K on a supporting hyperplane parallel to $u^{\perp }$ . The volume of this cone is $(2d)^{-1}\lambda _{d-1}(K\cap u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(K|l_{u})$ .

We mention that Busemann and Petty [Reference Busemann and Petty4] posed 10 problems about centrally symmetric convex bodies. So far, only Problem 1 from the list (called the Busemann–Petty problem) has been solved completely (see [Reference Koldobsky7] and the references therein). Problem 5 of [Reference Busemann and Petty4] asks the following question: are the ellipsoids only convex bodies characterized by the property that the quantity $(2d)^{-1}\lambda _{d-1}(K\cap u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(K|l_{u})$ is a constant for all $u\in S^{d-1}$ ? The authors [Reference Alfonseca, Nazarov, Ryabogin and Yaskin1] proved that if K is sufficiently close to the Euclidean ball in the Banach–Mazur metric, then K is an ellipsoid.

Using the dual mixed volume inequality (see [Reference Lutwak8] for dual mixed volumes) along with other inequalities, Lutwak [Reference Lutwak9] proved the following minimax inequality for double cones inscribed in a centered convex body K of ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ :

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(K\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(K|l_{u})\leq\frac{2\epsilon_{d}\epsilon_{d-1}}{\lambda(K^{\circ})},\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if K is an ellipsoid.

One can observe that the quantities $\lambda _{d-1}(K\cap u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(K|l_{u})\lambda ^{-1}(K)$ and ${\lambda _{d-1}(K|u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(K\cap l_{u})\lambda ^{-1}(K)}$ are invariant under a dilatation. Therefore, one could also set $\lambda (K)=\epsilon _{d}$ . In [Reference Martini and Mustafaev11], it was proved that if B is a centered convex body in ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ with $\lambda (B)=\epsilon _{d}$ , then

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}|l_{u})\leq 2\epsilon_{d-1},\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if B is an ellipsoid.

The purpose of this manuscript is to show that Lutwak’s minimax inequality for inscribed cones of a centered convex body B can be established using the Petty’s maxmin inequality for circumscribed cylinders of its polar body of $B^{\circ }$ . Furthermore, we show connections between the maximum volume of inscribed double cones of a centered convex body B and the minimum volume of circumscribed cylinders of its polar body $B^{\circ }$ . The homothety of a centered convex body B and the projection body of its polar body $\Pi B^{\circ }$ will be discussed as well.

2 Basic notations and facts

In this section, we recall some definitions, notations, and facts from convex geometry. A convex body K is a compact, convex subset of ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ with nonempty interior. A convex body K is said to be centered if it is symmetric with respect to the origin, i.e., $-K=K$ . We denote by $\mathcal K$ the set of convex bodies in ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ , and the set of centered convex bodies will be denoted by $\mathcal K_{o}$ . As usual, $S^{d-1}$ will stand for the standard Euclidean unit sphere in ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ . The symbol $\lambda _{i}(\cdot )$ will stand for the i-dimensional Lebesgue measure $($ volume $)$ in ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ , where $1\leq i\leq d$ , and when $i=d$ the subscript will be omitted. For a given direction $u\in S^{d-1}$ , we use $u^{\perp }$ to denote the $(d-1)$ -dimensional hyperplane (passing through the origin) orthogonal to u, and by $l_{u}$ the $1$ -subspace parallel to u. Furthermore, $\lambda _1 (K|l_u)$ denotes the width of K at u, and $\lambda _{d-1} (K | u^\perp )$ the $(d-1)$ -dimensional outer cross-section measure or brightness of K at $u \in S^{d-1}$ , where $K|u^\perp $ is the orthogonal projection of K onto $u^\perp $ (more about these notations, the reader should refer to [Reference Gardner5]).

For $K\in \mathcal K$ with the origin an interior point of K, its polar body $K^{\circ }$ is defined by

$$ \begin{align*}K^{\circ}=\{y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{d} : \langle x,y \rangle \leq 1, x\in K\},\end{align*} $$

where $\langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle $ denotes the standard scalar product in ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ .

We mention the following simple properties of $K\in \mathcal K_{o}$ : $(K^{\circ })^{\circ }=K$ , $(\alpha K)^{\circ }=(1/{\alpha })K^{\circ }$ for $\alpha>0$ . For $K_{1}\in \mathcal K_{0}$ and $K_{2}\in \mathcal K_{0}$ if $K_{1}\subseteq K_{2}$ , then $K^{\circ }_{2}\subseteq K^{\circ }_{1}$ .

The standard basis will be used to identify ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ and its dual space ${\mathbb {R}}^{d\ast }$ . In that case, $\lambda _{i}(\cdot )$ and $\lambda ^{\ast }_{i}(\cdot )$ coincide in ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ . The symbol $\epsilon _{i}$ will stand for the i-dimensional volume of the unit ball in ${\mathbb {R}}^{i}$ .

The support function $h_{K} : S^{d-1}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}$ of a convex body K is defined as $h_{K}(u)=\sup \{\langle u,y \rangle :y\in K\}$ . It is well known that $h_{K}$ is monotone with respect to inclusion (i.e., if $K\subseteq L$ , then $h_{K}\leq h_{L}$ ), and positive homogeneous (i.e., $h_{\alpha K}(u)= h_{K}(\alpha u)=\alpha h_{K}$ for all $\alpha>0$ ). Furthermore, if $0\in K$ , then $h_{K}(u)$ is the distance from the origin to the supporting hyperplane of K with outer unit normal vector u (more about support functions and properties, see [Reference Schneider16]). When the origin is an interior point of K, its radial function $\rho _{K}(u)$ is defined by $\rho _{K}(u)=\max \{\alpha \geq 0 : \alpha u\in K\}.$ The following relation between these two functions is well known:

(1) $$ \begin{align} \rho_{K^\circ}(u) = \frac{1}{h_K(u)}\,, \,\, u \in S^{d-1}\,. \end{align} $$

It is easy to observe that if K is a centered convex body, then $2\rho _{K}(u)=\lambda _{1}(K\cap l_{u})$ , and $2h_{K}(u)=\lambda _{1}(K|l_{u})$ for any $u\in S^{d-1}$ .

For $K\in \mathcal K$ , the projection body $\Pi K$ of K is defined as the convex body whose supporting hyperplane in a given direction u has a distance $\lambda _{d-1}(K|u^{\perp })$ from the origin, i.e., $h_{\Pi K}(u)=\lambda _{d-1}(K|u^{\perp })$ for each $u\in S^{d-1}$ (see [Reference Gardner5, Chapter 4]). Note that any projection body is a zonoid (i.e., a limit of vector sums of segments) centered at the origin.

The following well-known fact (see [Reference Gardner5]) will be used here for centered convex bodies; if S be a subspace of ${\mathbb {R}}^{d}$ and $B\in \mathcal K_{o}$ , then

(2) $$ \begin{align} (B\cap S)^{\circ}=B^{\circ}|S. \end{align} $$

For $B\in \mathcal K_{o}$ , the special case of Blaschke–Santaló inequality states that

$$ \begin{align*}\lambda(B)\lambda(B^{\circ})\leq \epsilon_{d}^2,\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if B is an ellipsoid (proved by Blaschke [Reference Blaschke3] in ${\mathbb {R}}^2$ and ${\mathbb {R}}^3$ , then by Santaló [Reference Santaló15] for all dimensions; more about this inequality the reader should refer to [Reference Gardner5] and the references therein).

3 Inequalities for inscribed double cones and circumscribed cylinders

First, we give the following alternative proof of Lutwak’s minimax inequality for inscribed double cones. For the sake of simplicity, we will omit the constant $(2d)^{-1}$ in the volume equation of inscribed double cones.

Theorem 1 If $B\in \mathcal K_{o}$ , then

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda(B^{\circ})\leq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d},\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if B is an ellipsoid.

Proof It follows from Petty’s result that there exists a unit vector $u\in S^{d-1}$ such that

(3) $$ \begin{align} \frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})}{\lambda(B^{\circ})}\geq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}. \end{align} $$

From the Blaschke–Santaló inequality and the identity (2), we have

(4) $$ \begin{align} \lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\leq\frac{\epsilon_{d-1}^2}{\lambda_{d-1}((B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})^{\circ})}=\frac{\epsilon_{d-1}^2}{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})}, \end{align} $$

with equality if and only if $B^{\circ }|u^{\perp }$ is an ellipsoid.

The identity (1) can be written as $2\rho _{B^{\circ }}(u)2h_{B}(u)=4$ for every $u\in S^{d-1}$ . It is equivalent to

(5) $$ \begin{align} \lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})=4. \end{align} $$

Therefore, (3)–(5) yield that there exists $u\in S^{d-1}$ such that

$$ \begin{align*}\frac{\epsilon_{d-1}^2}{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})}\frac{4}{\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}\geq\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\geq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}\lambda(B^{\circ}).\end{align*} $$

Thus, the result follows. Obviously, if B is an ellipsoid, then equality holds. Now, assume that

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda(B^{\circ})= 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d}.\end{align*} $$

Then, for every $u\in S^{d-1},$

$$ \begin{align*}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda(B^{\circ})\geq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d}.\end{align*} $$

Applying (2), (4), and the Blaschke–Santaló inequality to the last inequality yields

$$ \begin{align*}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})}{\lambda(B^{\circ})}\leq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}},\end{align*} $$

for all $u\in S^{d-1}$ . It follows from Petty’s result that $B^{\circ }$ must be an ellipsoid. Hence, B is an ellipsoid.

Problem 6 of [Reference Busemann and Petty4] asks to find a centered convex body B of ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ for which

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\end{align*} $$

is minimal. It was conjectured that the ellipsoid is the answer to this problem. Related to this conjecture, we prove the following result.

Theorem 2 Let B be a centered convex body in ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ . If

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\geq \frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}},\end{align*} $$

then

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\lambda(B)\leq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d}.\end{align*} $$

Proof It follows from the hypothesis of the theorem that there exists $u\in S^{d-1}$ such that

$$ \begin{align*}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\geq \frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}.\end{align*} $$

Using the Blaschke–Santaló inequality and (2), we get

$$ \begin{align*}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\leq\frac{\epsilon_{d-1}^2}{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})},\end{align*} $$

with equality if and only if $B\cap u^{\perp }$ is an ellipsoid. The result can be established using the identity (5). One can also see that if B is an ellipsoid, then equality holds for both, the hypothesis and the conclusion of theorem. Now, assume that

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\lambda(B)=2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d}.\end{align*} $$

Then

$$ \begin{align*}\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\lambda(B)\geq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d},\end{align*} $$

for all $u\in S^{d-1}$ . Applying (5), the Blaschke–Santaló inequality, and (2) to the last inequality, we get

$$ \begin{align*}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\leq \frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}},\end{align*} $$

for all $u\in S^{d-1}$ . Thus,

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}=\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}.\\[-42pt]\end{align*} $$

In [Reference Busemann and Petty4], it was also mentioned that the maximum value of the quantity

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\end{align*} $$

is still unsolved when $d\geq 3$ . Similar to Theorem 2, one can easily deduce the following related result.

Theorem 3 Let $B\in \mathcal K_{o}$ . If

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})\lambda(B)\geq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d},\end{align*} $$

then

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})}{\lambda(B)}\leq \frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}.\end{align*} $$

Furthermore, if $\min _{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda _{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda (B)^{-1}= 2\epsilon _{d-1}\epsilon _{d}^{-1}$ , then $\max _{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda _{d-1}(B^{\circ }|u^{\perp })\lambda _{1}(B^{\circ }\cap l_{u})\lambda (B)=2\epsilon _{d-1}\epsilon _{d}.$

One of the challenging problems in convex geometry is that whether a centered convex body B and $\Pi B^{\circ }$ (or $B^{\circ }$ and $\Pi B$ ) are homothetic if and only if B is an ellipsoid. We mention that the isoperimetrix of Holmes-Thompson measure is defined as ${\hat {I}_B={\epsilon _{d}}\lambda ^{-1}(B^{\circ })\epsilon _{d-1}^{-1}\Pi B^{\circ }}$ (see [Reference Thompson17]). The relative inner radius $r(B, \hat {I}_B)$ of B with respect to $\hat {I}_B$ is the largest $\alpha>0$ such that $\alpha \hat {I}_B\subseteq B$ , and the relative outer radius $R(B, \hat {I}_B)$ of B with respect to $\hat {I}_B$ is the smallest $\alpha>0$ such that $B\subseteq \alpha \hat {I}_B$ . In [Reference Martini and Mustafaev11], it was shown that

(6) $$ \begin{align} R(B, \hat{I}_B)=\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}\frac{\lambda(B^{\circ})}{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})} \end{align} $$

and

(7) $$ \begin{align} r(B, \hat{I}_B)=\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}\frac{\lambda(B^{\circ})}{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})}. \end{align} $$

Theorem 4 Let B be a centered convex body in ${\mathbb {R}}^d$ . If

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda(B^{\circ})\geq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d},\end{align*} $$

then B and $\Pi B^{\circ }$ are homothetic if and only if B is an ellipsoid.

Proof Similar to Theorem 1, one can easily establish that if

$$ \begin{align*}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\lambda_{d-1}(B\cap u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B|l_{u})\lambda(B^{\circ})\geq 2\epsilon_{d-1}\epsilon_{d},\end{align*} $$

then

$$ \begin{align*}\min_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})}{\lambda(B^{\circ})}\leq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}.\end{align*} $$

Therefore,

$$ \begin{align*}1\leq\frac{2\epsilon_{d-1}}{\epsilon_{d}}\max_{u\in S^{d-1}}\frac{\lambda(B^{\circ})}{\lambda_{d-1}(B^{\circ}|u^{\perp})\lambda_{1}(B^{\circ}\cap l_{u})}.\end{align*} $$

Hence, the identity (6) yields $R(B, \hat {I}_{B})\geq 1.$

Applying Petty’s result to (7), we obtain that $r(B, \hat {I}_{B})\leq 1$ , with equality if and only if B is an ellipsoid (see also [Reference Thompson17]). One can observe that B and $\Pi B^{\circ }$ are homothetic if and only if $r(B,\hat {I}_{B})=R(B, \hat {I}_{B})$ . It could be the case only if B is an ellipsoid.

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank the referee for careful reading of the manuscript and making valuable suggestions.

References

Alfonseca, M. A., Nazarov, P., Ryabogin, D., and Yaskin, V., A solution to the fifth and the eighth Busemann–Petty problems in a small neighborhood of the Euclidean ball . Adv. Math. 390(2021), Article no. 107920, 28 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezdek, K. and Lángi, Z., Volumetric discrete geometry, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications (Boca Raton), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaschke, W., Über affine Geometrie VII: Neue Extremeigenschaften von ellipse und ellipsoid . Ber. Verh. Sächs. Akad. Wiss. Leipzig Math-Phys. Kl. 69(1917), 306318.Google Scholar
Busemann, H. and Petty, C. M., Problems on convex bodies . Math. Scand. 4(1956), 8894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. J., Geometric tomography. 2nd ed., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 58, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, Á. G. and Lángi, Z., On the volume of the convex hull of two convex bodies . Monatsh. Math. 174(2014), no. 2, 219229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koldobsky, A., Fourier analysis in convex geometry, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 116, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutwak, E., Intersection bodies and dual mixed volumes . Adv. Math. 71(1988), 232261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutwak, E., A minimax inequality for inscribed cones . J. Math. Anal. Appl. 176(1993), no. 1, 148155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, H. and Mustafaev, Z., Some applications of cross-section measures in Minkowski spaces . Period. Math. Hung. 53(2006), 185197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, H. and Mustafaev, Z., New inequalities for product of cross-section measures . Math. Inequal. Appl. 20(2017), no. 2, 353361.Google Scholar
Petty, C. M., Projection bodies . In: Proc. coll. convexity, Copenhagen, 1965, Kobenhavs Univ. Mat. Inst., Copenhagen, 1967, pp. 234241.Google Scholar
Petty, C. M., Isoperimetric problems . In: Proc. conf. convexity and combinatorial geometry (Univ. Oklahoma, 1971), University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 1972, pp. 2641.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. A. and Shephard, G. C., Some extremal problems for convex bodies . Mathematika 5(1958), 93102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santaló, L. A., Un invariante afin Para los cuerpos convexos del espacio de $n$ dimensiones . Port. Math. 8(1949), 155161.Google Scholar
Schneider, R., Convex bodies: the Brunn–Minkowski theory. 2nd ed., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 151, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. C., Minkowski geometry, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, 63, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar