Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:00:52.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stratarchical Party Organization and Party Finance in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2011

David Coletto*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Harold J. Jansen*
Affiliation:
University of Lethbridge
Lisa Young*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
David Coletto, University of Calgary, [email protected]
Harold J. Jansen, University of Lethbridge, [email protected]
Lisa Young, University of Calgary, [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract. Based on an examination of constitutional and other party documents, Canadian political parties have been described as stratarchically organized (Carty, 2002). We identify four models of internal party financial flows that correspond to different models of internal party organization. We then trace the financial flows into and within the four major Canadian political parties from 2004 to 2007 with a view to identifying the model of party organization that these flows indicate. Our evidence in some respects supports Carty's assertion that Canadian parties are stratarchically organized, but it also suggests that changes to the regulatory regime governing political finance have contributed to a centralization of power at the level of the national party and at the expense of candidates and local associations. This centralizing tendency is significant, as it may disrupt the bargain that underlies the stratarchical organization of Canadian parties.

Résumé. À la lumière d'une revue des constitutions et de divers autres documents des partis politiques canadiens, ces derniers ont été décrits comme étant organisés de manière stratarchique (Carty, 2002). Nous dégageons quatre modèles de flux monétaires internes des partis qui correspondent à différents modèles d'organisation interne des partis politiques. Nous retraçons les entrées de fonds des quatre principaux partis politiques canadiens et leur distribution interne de 2004 à 2007 en vue d'identifier le modèle d'organisation de parti qui correspond à ces flux monétaires. Sous certains rapports, nos résultats appuient l'argument de Carty affirmant que les partis canadiens sont organisés de manière stratarchique, mais ils suggèrent aussi que les changements apportés au régime régulateur gouvernant le financement politique ont contribué à une centralisation du pouvoir au niveau national des partis et ce aux dépens des candidats et des associations locales. Cette tendance centralisatrice est importante, car elle peut rompre le compromis qui sous-tend l'organisation stratarchique des partis politiques canadiens.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carty, R. Kenneth. 2002. “The Politics of Tecumseh Corners: Canadian Political Parties as Franchise Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth. 2004. “Parties as Franchise Systems: The Stratarchical Organizational Imperative.” Party Politics 10 (1): 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R. Kenneth and Cross, William. 2006. “Can Stratarchically Organized Parties be Democratic? The Canadian Case.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16 (2): 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K. and Eagles, Munroe. 2005. Politics is Local: National Politics at the Grassroots. Don Mills ON: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coletto, David and Eagles, Munroe. 2008. “The Implications of Canada's New Regulatory Regime for Local Party Organization in Canada.” In Money, Politics and Democracy: Assessing the Impact of Canada's Party Finance Reform, ed. Young, Lisa and Jansen, Harold. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Courtney, John. 1970. “Recognition of Canadian Political Parties in Parliament and in Law.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 11 (1): 3360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, William. 2004. Political Parties. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Elections Canada. 2008. “Contributions and Expenses at the Federal Election or By-election: Candidates and Registered Parties.” http://www.elections.ca (29 April 2008).Google Scholar
Katz, R. and Mair, P.. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1(1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffin, Martin, Shaw, Eric and Taylor, Gerald. 2007. “The New Sub-National Politics of the British Labour Party.” Party Politics 13(1): 88108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2004. “Regulating Campaign Finance in Canada: Strengths and Weaknesses.” Election Law Journal 3(3): 444–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa, and Cross, William. 2002. “The Rise of Plebiscitary Democracy in Canadian Political Parties.” Party Politics 8(6): 673–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Lisa, Sayers, Anthony and Jansen, Harold. 2007. “Altering the Political Landscape: State Funding and Party Finance.” In Canadian Parties in Transition, ed. Gagnon, Alain-G. and Tanguay, Brian. 3rd ed.Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar