Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:04:27.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Policy Work in Multi-Level States: Institutional Autonomy and Task Allocation among Canadian Policy Analysts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2013

Michael Howlett  and
Adam M. Wellstead
Michael Howlett*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Adam M. Wellstead*
Affiliation:
Michigan Technological University
*
Michael Howlett, Department of Political Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, V5A 1S6, Canada, [email protected]
Adam M. Wellstead, Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton MI 49931-1295, USA, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. Despite all the attention paid to the topic of policy analysis as a conceptual endeavour, empirically, the actual work of policy analysts is little investigated and little known. This is true generally of most countries and jurisdictions but it is most acute at the subnational level of government in multilevel states. Recent work in Canada, however, based on comprehensive surveys of analysts of provincial and territorial policy, on the one hand, and regionally and Ottawa-based federal policy workers on the other, has found many similarities with national-level work but also significant differences. This work has highlighted differences in the distribution of tasks across jurisdictions—mainly the extent to which policy work involves implementation as well as formulation-related activities—as key distinctions found in policy work across levels of the Canadian multilevel system. This article uses frequency and principal components analysis (PCA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to probe these dimensions of policy work. It shows provincial and territorial analysts to be similar to regionally based federal workers in task allocation, undermining a straightforward depiction of differences in policy work by level of government. The extent of autonomy enjoyed by policy workers in different jurisdictional venues, both from internal actors and those outside of government, is shown to be the key driver of differences in policy work across levels of government.

Résumé. Malgré toute l'attention accordée au thème de l'analyse politique comme un effort conceptuel, empirique du travail réel des analystes des politiques est peu étudié et mal connu. Ceci est vrai en général de la plupart des pays et juridictions, mais est le plus aigu au niveau sous-national de gouvernement dans les États multi-niveaux. Des travaux récents au Canada, cependant, basée sur des enquêtes complètes des provinces et des territoires, d'une part, et régional et basée à Ottawa analystes de la politique fédérale, d'autre part, a trouvé de nombreuses similitudes avec le travail au niveau national mais aussi des différences significatives. Ce travail a mis en évidence des différences dans la répartition des tâches entre les administrations – notamment la mesure dans laquelle le travail politique consiste à la mise en œuvre ainsi que la formulation des activités liées – comme les distinctions clés trouvés dans le travail politique à travers les niveaux de l'canadienne système multi-niveau. Cet article utilise la fréquence et analyse en composantes principales (ACP) et la modélisation par équations structurelles (SEM) pour sonder ces dimensions du travail politique. Il montre les analystes provinciaux et territoriaux à être semblables à l'échelle régionale basée sur les travailleurs fédéraux dans la répartition des tâches, minant une représentation directe des différences dans le travail politique, par niveau de gouvernement. Le degré d'autonomie dont jouissent les travailleurs dans les différents lieux de la politique juridictionnelle – à la fois par des acteurs internes et ceux de l'extérieur du gouvernement – se révèle être le principal moteur de différences dans le travail politique à travers les niveaux de gouvernement.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 757 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, Donald E. 2007. “Any Ideas? Think Tanks and Policy Analysis in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Aucoin, Peter and Bakvis, Herman. 2005. “Public Service Reform and Policy Capacity: Recruiting and Retaining the Best and the Brightest.” In Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Painter, M. and Pierre, J.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bakvis, Herman. 1997. “Advising the Executive: Think Tanks, Consultants, Political Staff and Kitchen Cabinets.” In The Hollow Crown: Countervailing Trends in Core Executives, ed. Weller, P., Bakvis, H. and Rhodes, R. A. W.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bakvis, Herman. 2000. “Rebuilding Policy Capacity in the Era of the Fiscal Dividend: A Report from Canada.” Governance 13 (1): 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernier, Luc and Howlett, Michael. 2009. La capacité d'analyse des politiques au gouvernement du Québec: Résultats du sondage auprès des fonctionnaires québécois. Report to the Institute of Public Administration of Canada, Quebec City Branch.Google Scholar
Bernier, Luc and Howlett, Michael. 2010. “La capacité d'analyse des politiques au gouvernement du Québec: Résultats du sondage auprès des fonctionnaires québécois.” Canadian Public Administration 54 (1): 143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebatch, H.K. 2005. “Policy Analysis, Policy Practice and Political Science.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 64 (3): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebatch, H.K. 2006. The Work of Policy: An International Survey. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Colebatch, H.K. and Radin, B.A.. 2006. “Mapping the Work of Policy.” In The Work of Policy: An International Survey, ed. Colebatch, H.K.. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Howlett, Michael and Laycock, David. 2007. Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durning, D. and Osuna, W.. 1994. “Policy Analysts' Roles and Value Orientations: An Empirical Investigation Using Q Methodology.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13 (4): 629–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrow, J. 2001. “‘Capacity Building’ as a Public Management Goal: Myth, Magic of the Main Chance.” Public Management Review 3 (2): 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduk, Leslie A. 1987. Structural Equation Modelling with LISREL. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hayduk, Leslie A. 1996. LISREL Issues, Debates and Strategies. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, John A. 2005a. “Policy Analysis for What? The Effectiveness of Nonpartisan Policy Research Organizations.” Policy Studies Journal 33 (1): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hird, John A. 2005b. Power, Knowledge and Politics: Policy Analysis in the States. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Honadle, Beth Walter. 1981. “A Capacity-Building Framework: A Search for Concept and Purpose.” Public Administration Review 41 (5): 575–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, R. and Jeliazkova, M.. 2006. “How Policy Workers Define Their Job: A Netherlands Case Study.” In The Work of Policy: An International Survey, ed. Colebatch, H.K.. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 1999. “Federalism and Public Policy.” In Canadian Politics, ed. Bickerton, J. and Gagnon, A.. 3rd ed. Peterborough ON: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009a. “Policy Analytical Capacity and Evidence-Based Policy Making: Lessons from Canada.” Canadian Public Administration 52 (2): 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009b. “A Profile of BC Provincial Policy Analysts: Troubleshooters or Planners?” Canadian Political Science Review 3 (3): 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael. 2009c. “Policy Advice in Multi-Level Governance Systems: Sub-National Policy Analysts and Analysis.” International Review of Public Administration 13 (3): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael, and Newman, Joshua. 2010. “Policy analysis and policy work in federal systems: Policy advice and its contribution to evidence-based policy making in multilevel governance systems.” Policy and Society 29 (3): 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Oliphant, Samuel. 2010. “Environmental Research Organizations and Climate Change Policy Analytical Capacity: An Assessment of the Canadian Case.” Canadian Political Science Review 4 (2-3): 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael, and Wellstead, Adam. 2011. “Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy Revisited: The Nature of Professional Policy Work in Contemporary Government.” Politics & Policy 39 (4): 613–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, Michael and Wellstead, Adam. 2012. “Professional Policy Work in Federal States: Institutional Autonomy and Canadian Policy Analysis.” Canadian Public Administration 55 (1): 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. 2005. Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E.O. and Knoke, D.. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
McArthur, Doug. 2007. “Policy Analysis in Provincial Governments in Canada: From PPBS to Network Management.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Meltsner, A.J. 1976. Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Catherine. 2007. “The Media.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Alan, Roos, Goran and Vickers-Willis, Tony. 2007. “Evaluating an Australian Public Policy Organization's Innovation Capacity.” European Journal of Innovation Management 10 (4): 532–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, E.C. and Jenkins, B.. 2005. Policy Bureaucracy: Governing with a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, M. and Pierre, J.. 2005. Challenges to State Policy Capacity: Global Trends and Comparative Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, W. 2004. “Not Just Steering but Weaving: Relevant Knowledge and the Craft of Building Policy Capacity and Coherence.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 63 (1): 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piattoni, Simona. 2009. “Multi-level Governance: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis.” Journal of European Integration 31(2): 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, B.A. 2000. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Riddell, Norman. 2007. Policy research capacity in the federal government. Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative.Google Scholar
Rieper, Olaf and Toulemonde, Jacques. 1997. Politics and Practices of Intergovernmental Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Speers, Kimberly. 2007. “The Invisible Public Service: Consultants and Public Policy in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
State Services Commission. 1991. Review of the Purchase of Policy Advice from Government Departments. Wellington: State Services Commission.Google Scholar
State Services Commission. 1999. Essential Ingredients: Improving the Quality of Policy Advice. Wellington: New Zealand State Services Commission.Google Scholar
Stritch, Andrew. 2007. “Business Associations and Policy Analysis in Canada.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Uhr, John and Mackay, Keith, eds. 1996. Evaluating Policy Advice: Learning from Commonwealth Experience. Canberra: Federalism Research Centre—ANU.Google Scholar
Voyer, Jean-Pierre. 2007. “Policy Analysis in the Federal Government: Building the Forward-Looking Policy Research Capacity.” In Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art, ed. Dobuzinskis, L., Howlett, M. and Laycock, D.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Edward P. and Khademian, Anne M.. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Carol H. and Bucuvalas, Michael J.. 1980. Social Science Research and Decision-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weller, Patrick, and Stevens, Bronwyn. 1998. “Evaluating Policy Advice: The Australian Experience.” Public Administration 76 (Autumn): 579–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellstead, Adam and Stedman, Richard. 2007. “Co-ordinating future adaptation polices across Canadian natural resources.” Climate Policy 7 (1): 29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellstead, Adam and Stedman, Richard. 2010. “Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada's Federal Government: The Intersection of Policy Analysis and Street Level Bureaucracy.” Public Management Review 12 (6): 893–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellstead, A.M., Stedman, R.C. and Howlett, M.. 2011. “Policy Analytical Capacity in Changing Governance Contexts: A Structural Equation Model (SEM) Study of Contemporary Canadian Policy Work.” Public Policy and Administration 26 (3): 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellstead, A.M., Stedman, R.C. and Lindquist, E.A.. 2007. “Beyond the National Capital Region: Federal Regional Policy Capacity.” In Report prepared for the Treasury Board Secretariat of Canada. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Wellstead, A.M., Stedman, R.C., and Lindquist, E.A.. 2009. “The Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada's Federal Public Service.” Canadian Political Science Review 3 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafonte, M. and Sabatier, P.. 2004. “Short-Term Versus Long-Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989.” Policy Studies Journal 32 (1): 75–107.Google Scholar