Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:53:06.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Talk: Assessing the Feminist Rhetoric of Women Leadership Candidates in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Sylvia Bashevkin
Sylvia Bashevkin*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Sylvia Bashevkin, Department of Political Science, 15 King's College Circle, suite 165, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaM5S 3H7; [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This study examines public statements by female candidates for the leadership of major federal parties in the period 1975–2006, with reference to the conceptual literature on political representation. Was the willingness of women politicians to voice feminist rhetoric more closely related to extra-parliamentary dynamics, notably the changing fortunes of feminist and antifeminist movements, or to parliamentary factors, including the ideological as well as competitive circumstances of their parties? The empirical discussion suggests feminist content was particularly strong in the language of Rosemary Brown for the NDP in 1975, Kim Campbell for the PCs in 1993 and Martha Hall Findlay for the Liberals in 2006. Overall results point toward the utility of a two-pronged perspective that merges a parliamentary view that centre-left through centre-right parties, as well as those in an opposition or weak governing position, were more likely sites of feminist discourse than hard right and firmly competitive parties, with a movement-focused approach that explains the diminished use of representational rhetoric during this period, even in relatively hospitable parties, with reference to the declining legitimacy of organized feminism. Unlike in the US, women candidates in right parties in Canada did not use their campaigns as vehicles for voicing strong antifeminist positions.

Résumé. Cette étude survole la littérature conceptuelle sur la représentation politique et examine ainsi les déclarations publiques faites par les candidates lors des courses à la direction des principaux partis politiques fédéraux pendant la période allant de 1975 à 2006. La volonté des politiciennes d'exprimer la rhétorique féministe était-elle davantage apparentée à la dynamique extra-parlementaire, notamment la force des mouvements féministes et antiféministes, ou plutôt aux facteurs parlementaires comme l'idéologie et la compétitivité de leur parti? La discussion empirique suggère que le contenu féministe était particulièrement important dans le vocabulaire utilisé par Rosemary Brown pour le NPD en 1975, par Kim Campbell pour le PPC en 1993 et par Martha Hall Findlay pour le PLC en 2006. Les résultats indiquent qu'il est utile, pour ce type d'étude, de considérer une fusion des deux approches. La première est une perspective parlementaire, qui suggère que les partis se situant sur le spectre politique entre le centre-gauche et le centre-droit, de même que ceux qui se trouvent dans une position d'opposition ou de gouvernement faible ou minoritaire, sont les plus réceptifs aux discours féministes. La deuxième approche (movement-focused) porte son attention sur les mouvements sociaux pour expliquer la diminution de l'utilisation de la rhétorique représentationnelle pendant cette période, et ce, même dans les partis relativement réceptifs au féminisme organisé. Contrairement à la situation aux États-Unis, les candidates à la direction des partis de droite au Canada n'ont pas utilisé la course à l'investiture de leur parti comme tremplin pour exprimer de fortes positions antiféministes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 345 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2009, © Sylvia Bashevkin 2009. Not for quotation or citation without permission.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, Alvin. 1976. Flora MacDonald. Toronto: J.M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia B. 1985. Toeing the Lines: Women and Party Politics in English Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia B. 1993. Toeing the Lines: Women and Party Politics in English Canada. 2nd ed.Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bashevkin, Sylvia. 1998. Women on the Defensive: Living Through Conservative Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Black, Naomi. 2007. “Broccoli or Spinach? Studying the Women's Movement in Canada and Elsewhere.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Brown, Rosemary. 1975a. Declaration of leadership intentions, February 12. Rare Books and Special Collections, University of British Columbia Library.Google Scholar
Brown, Rosemary. 1975b. Convention speech, July 6. Rare Books and Special Collections, University of British Columbia Library.Google Scholar
Brown, Rosemary. 1989. Being Brown: A Very Public Life. Toronto: Random House.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kim. 1996. Time and Chance: The Political Memoirs of Canada's First Woman Prime Minister. Toronto: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna and Krook, Mona Lee. 2007. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Paper presented at the joint workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, Jane, LeDuc, Lawrence and Pammett, Jon H.. 1996. Absent Mandate: Canadian Electoral Politics in an Era of Restructuring. Vancouver: Gage.Google Scholar
Courtney, John C. 1973. The Selection of National Party Leaders in Canada. Toronto: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Courtney, John C. 2003. Do Conventions Matter? Choosing National Party Leaders in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Delacourt, Susan. 1990. “Copps enters Liberal race with promise of tough fight.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), January 16, A2.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fife, Robert. 1993. Kim Campbell: The Making of a Politician. Toronto: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
“From the Podium.” 2006. Globe and Mail (Toronto), December 2, A11.Google Scholar
Gray, Malcolm. 1975. “Has Rosemary Brown's socialist image more style than substance?” Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 20.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm,” Perspectives on Politics 5 (1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Nick. 1975. “For Broadbent, the West is the Test.” Winnipeg Tribune, July 3.Google Scholar
Johnson, William. 2005. Stephen Harper and the Future of Canada. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian. 2003a. “Copps launches Grit leadership bid.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 14, A4.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian. 2003b. “Copps lashes out at slight to her bid for PM.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), April 17, A4.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian. 2004. “Belinda Stronach's ‘new way.’” Globe and Mail (Toronto), January 21, A1.Google Scholar
Laghi, Brian and Mackie, Richard. 2002. “Alliance puts brakes on Campaign Life.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), February 9, A8.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, Daniel. 2004. “Private-sector health role supported by Stronach.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), January 27, A4.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 2005. “Race, Ethnicity, and Electoral Mobilization: Where's the Party?” In The Politics of Democratic Inclusion, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina and Hero, Rodney E.. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
“Liberal Leadership Race.” 2006. Transcript. Mike Duffy Live, CTV, October 2.Google Scholar
MacGregor, Roy. 2006a. “How ‘Martha Who Who’ joined the big-name race that has yet to take place.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), March 16, A2.Google Scholar
MacGregor, Roy. 2006b. “Dion took the most votes but wasn't the only winner at the Liberal convention.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), December 5, A2.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2007. “‘Thick’ Conceptions of Substantive Representation: Women, Gender, and Political Institutions.” Paper presented at the joint workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, Helsinki.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, Lloyd. 2005. The Pilgrimage of Stephen Harper. Toronto: ECW Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Jill. 2006. “I'm doing this because I know I can contribute.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), September 18, A3.Google Scholar
Martin, Don. 2006. Belinda: The Political and Private Life of Belinda Stronach. Toronto: Key Porter.Google Scholar
McDonald, Marci. 2006. “Stephen Harper and the Theo-cons.” The Walrus (October): 45–61.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Audrey, with Archbold, Rick. 1992. A Woman's Place: My Life and Politics. Toronto: Macfarlane Walter and Ross.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Mary-Jo. 2009. “Rebuilding the House of Canadian Feminism: NAC and the Racial Politics of Participation.” In Opening Doors Wider: Women's Political Engagement in Canada, ed. Bashevkin, Sylvia. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey. 2002. “Moderates among the ideological heathens.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), March 8, A17.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jeffrey. 2004. “Money (even oodles of it) isn't everything.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), January 22, A21.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Jill, Rankin, Pauline and Appelle, Christine. 1993. Politics as if Women Mattered: A Political Analysis of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. “The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender.” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 235–48.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Reginald. 1977. The Government Party: Organizing and Financing the Liberal Party of Canada, 1930–58. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikipedia. 2009. Bev Meslo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bev_Meslo (10 April 2009).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. 2008 Mary Walker-Sawka. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Walker-Sawka (10 April 2009).Google Scholar
Winsor, Hugh. 1975. “Style of candidates as important as content.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), July 7, 1.Google Scholar
Winsor, Hugh. 1995. “Feisty McDonough raises solidarity issue.” Globe and Mail (Toronto), October 13, A9.Google Scholar
Winsor, Hugh. 2003. “Copps's platform shows she's done her homework” Globe and Mail (Toronto), August 5, A7.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar