Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T05:44:58.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Out of Sync: The Disconnect Between Constitutional Clauses and State Legislation on Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2011

Jonathan Fox
Jonathan Fox*
Affiliation:
Bar Ilan University
*
Jonathan Fox, Department of Political Studies, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. This study examines the influence of constitutional clauses—which either establish religions (EOR) or separation of religion and state (SRAS)—on state religion policy as measured by the Religion and State (RAS) dataset's religious legislation variable for 166 states. The results show that, even when controlling for structural factors which have been shown to influence the level of religious legislation, constitutional clauses have a significant impact. However, this influence is small compared to structural factors and is limited to the presence or absence of EOR and SRAS clauses. The specific wording of these clauses has minimal, if any, impact on legislation. This study also finds that religious legislation is ubiquitous even in states with SRAS clauses in their constitutions.

Résumé. Cette étude examine l'influence exercée par les clauses constitutionnelles – qui régissent l'établissement d'une religion officielle (EOR) ou la séparation de l'Église et de l'État (SRAS) – sur la politique religieuse des États, telle que mesurée par les données de la législation religieuse de 166 États, celles-ci étant répertoriées dans la base de données RAS (l'Église et l'État). Les résultats montrent que même lorsqu'on étudie les facteurs structurels qui ont une incidence reconnue sur le niveau de législation religieuse, les clauses constitutionnelles ont un impact notable. Leur influence s'avère toutefois faible en comparaison de celle des facteurs structurels et elle se limite à la présence ou à l'absence de clauses EOR et SRAS. La formulation précise de ces clauses influe peu ou pas du tout sur la législation. L'étude conclut également que la législation religieuse est omniprésente, même dans les États dont la constitution comporte des clauses de séparation de l'Église et de l'État.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 59 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, D.B., Kurian, G.T. and Johnson, T.M.. 2001. World Christian Encyclopedia. 2nd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beatty, David M. 2001. “The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation (National approaches to religious freedom).” American Journal of Comparative Law 49 (1): 79–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, Kevin and Sheen, Juliet, eds. 1997. Freedom of Religion and Belief: A World Report. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bugaric, Bojan. 2008. “Populism, Liberal Democracy, and the Rule of Law in Central and Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Societies 41: 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, Mark and Cann, David E.. 1992. “Religion, Pluralism and Religious Market Structure.” Rationality and Society 4 (3): 272–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 1996. “Constitutional Promises and Repressive Reality: A Cross-National Time-Series Investigation of Why Political and Civil Liberties are Repressed.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 627–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2004. “Judicial Reform in Argentina in the 1990s: How Electoral Incentives Shape Institutional Change.” Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fombad, Charles M. 2007. “Challenges to Constitutionalism and Constitutional Rights in Africa and the Enabling Role of Political Parties: Lessons and Perspectives from Southern Africa.” American Journal of Comparative Law 55 (1): 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2006. “World Separation of Religion and State into the 21st Century.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (5): 537–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2008. A World Survey of Religion and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlicki, Leszek Lech. 2001. “Perspectives on Freedom of Conscience and Religion in the Jurisprudence of Constitutional Courts.” Brigham Young University Law Review 2: 467–510.Google Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 1999. “Government Regulation, Social Anomie and Religious Pluralism in Latin America: A Cross-National Analysis.” Rationality and Society 11 (3): 287–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Anthony. 2008. The Political Origins of Religious Liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodliffe, Jay and Hawkins, Darren G.. 2006. “Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention against Torture.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 358–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, Brian J. and Finke, Roger. 2006. “International Religion Indexes: Government Regulation, Government Favoritism, and Social Regulation of Religion.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion 2 (1): 1–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Grim, Brian J. and Finke, Roger. 2007. “Religious Persecution on Cross-National Context: Clashing Civilizations or Regulating Religious Economies.” American Sociological Review 72: 633–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Conway. 1993. “Population Pressures and Political Repression.” Social Science Quarterly 74 (2): 322–33.Google Scholar
Hurd, Elizabeth S. 2004a. “The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Elizabeth S. 2004b. “The International Politics of Secularism: US Foreign Policy and the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Alternatives 29 (2): 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Elizabeth S. 2006. “Negotiating Europe: The Politics of Religion and the Prospects for Turkish Accession.” Review of International Studies 32: 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, Linda C. 2002. “Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977–1996): Are They More than Mere Window Dressing?” Political Research Quarterly 55 (1): 111–43.Google Scholar
Keith, Linda C. and Poe, Steven C.. 2006. “Are Constitutional State of Emergency Clauses Effective? An Empirical Exploration.” Human Rights Quarterly 26 (4): 1071–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2006. “Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion.” World Politics 59 (4): 568–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madeley, John T.S. 2003. “European Liberal Democracy and the Principle of State Religious Neutrality.” West European Politics 26 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, Rachel M. and Barro, Robert J.. 2006a. “Religion and International Economy in an International Panel.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 45 (2): 149–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCleary, Rachel M. and Barro, Robert J.. 2006b. “Religion and Economy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. 1992. “Religious Freedom at a Crossroads.” University of Chicago Law Review 59 (1): 115–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Trevor W. 2006. “Constitutional Avoidance in the Executive Branch.” Columbia Law Review 106 (6): 1189–1259.Google Scholar
Murphey, Walter F. 1993. “Constitutions, Constitutionalism, and Democracy.” In Constitutions and Democracy: Transition in the Contemporary World, ed. Greenberg, Douglas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 505–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkus, Lauren E. and Meyer, Katherine. 2008. “Religious Noncoercive and Coercive Regulations: A New Typology for Cross-National Research.” International Journal of Sociology 38 (3): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Peter H. Jr. 2007. “Courts and Judges in Authoritarian Regimes.” World Politics 60: 122–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2000. “Religion, Democracy, and the ‘Twin Tolerations.’” Journal of Democracy 11 (4): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2000. “A Political Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Bolivia and Columbia.” Journal of Latin American Studies 32: 207–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The CIA World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/Google Scholar
Religion and Law Consortium, www.religlaw.orgGoogle Scholar
International Constitutional Law Constitutional Documents, www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/Google Scholar
The Political Database of the Americas, Constitutions and Comparative Constitutional Studyhttp://pdba.georgetown.edu/Constitutions/constudies.htmlGoogle Scholar
Constitution Finder, http://confinder.richmond.edu/Google Scholar