Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:14:57.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La vice-présidence américaine contemporaine : une école pour la présidence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2008

Karine Prémont
Karine Prémont*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
*
Karine Prémont, Département de science politique, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), case postale 8888, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal (Québec) H3C 3P8; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Résumé. La vice-présidence est probablement l'institution la plus sous-estimée de la démocratie américaine. Souvent la cible de quolibets, elle a cependant réussi à se transformer et à se définir au fil des années. Aujourd'hui, les vice-présidents sont presque automatiquement pressentis à la présidence et d'ailleurs, la majorité d'entre eux ont cette ambition. Que s'est-il donc passé pour que la vice-présidence devienne une institution d'où peut émaner un éventuel président? Pour répondre à cette question, nous examinons, dans un premier temps, les changements externes qui ont contribué à modifier les fonctions vice-présidentielles. Dans un deuxième temps, nous comparons quatre vice-présidents contemporains (Nixon, Ford, Mondale et Bush) pour tenter de voir s'il existe une corrélation entre le mode de gestion qu'ils ont adopté et leur succès ou leur échec durant leur campagne présidentielle. Finalement, nous abordons d'autres pistes de réflexion afin de cerner les éléments qui permettraient d'expliquer en quoi la vice-présidence est un atout pour d'éventuels candidats à la présidence.

Abstract. The vice-presidency is probably the most unappreciated and the most underestimated institution of the American democracy. Often the target of gibes, it nevertheless achieved a radical transformation years after years. Now, vice-presidents are almost always considered for the presidency and moreover, the majority of them have the ambition to be president someday since World War II. What can explain that the vice-presidency, not ridiculed anymore, is now an institution where one can find the next president of the United States? To answer this question, we initially examine the external changes that affected the vice-presidential functions. Secondly, we compare four contemporary vice-presidents (Nixon, Ford, Mondale and Bush) in order to see if their management style is linked to their chances to be president. Finally, we talk about other considerations that could explain why the vice-presidency is a significant asset for those who want to be president.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 953 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Abbott, Philip. 2005. «Accidental Presidents: Death, Assassination, Resignation, and Democratic Succession». Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 35, nº 4 (décembre), 627–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernier, Gérald. 2001. “L'election présidentielle.” Dans Le système politique américain. Orban, Edmond et Fortmann, Michel, dir., Montréal : Presses de l'Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Cannon, James. 1997. «Gerald R. Ford and Nelson A. Rockefeller: A Vice Presidential Memoir». Dans At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the 20th Century. Walch, Timothy, dir., Columbia : University of Missouri Press, 135–43.Google Scholar
Corbo, Claude. 2000. «La vice-présidence des États-Unis : tremplin ou tombeau». Le Devoir, 25 octobre, A7.Google Scholar
Corbo, Claude. 2004. Les États-Unis d'Amérique. Tome II : Les institutions. Québec : Septentrion.Google Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. et Genovese, Michael A.. 2004. The Paradoxes of the American Presidency. 2e édition. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Felzenberg, Alvin S. 2001. «The Vice Presidency Grows Up». Policy Review, nº 105 (février-mars), [http://www.policyreview.org/feb01/felzenberg.html]Google Scholar
Gillon, Steven M. 1997. «A New Framework: Walter Mondale as Vice President». Dans At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the 20th Century. Walch, Timothy, dir., Columbia : University of Missouri Press, 144–54.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joel K. 1982. The Modern American Vice Presidency. The Transformation of a Political Institution. Princeton : Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joel K. 1995. «The New Constitutional Vice Presidency». Wake Forest Law Review, vol. 30, nº 3 (automne), 505–61 .Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. et Rice, Tom. 1982. «Presidential Popularity and Presidential Vote», Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 46, nº 4 (hiver), 534–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. et Rice, Tom. 1984. «Forecasting Presidential Elections». Political Behavior, vol. 6, nº 1, 9–21.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1982. Vice Presidential Power: Advice and Influence in the White House. Maryland : John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1983–1984. «Vice-Presidential Influence Under Rockefeller and Mondale». Political Science Quarterly, vol. 98, nº 4 (hiver), 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, Franco et Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1994. «Presidential Succession Effects in Voting». British Journal of Political Science, vol. 24, nº 4 (octobre), 495–516.Google Scholar
Medina, J. Michael. 1990. «The American Vice-Presidency Toward a More Utilized Institution». George Mason University Law Review, vol. 13, nº 1 (automne), 77–111.Google Scholar
Murphy, John M. et Stuckey, Mary E.. 2002. «Never Cared to Say Goodbye: Presidential Legacies and Vice Presidential Campaigns». Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, nº 1 (mars), 46–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard et Lewis-Beck, Michael S.. 2001. «National Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections». Journal of Politics, vol. 63, nº 1 (février), 159–81.Google Scholar
Nelson, Michael. 1988. A Heartbeat Away: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Vice Presidency. New York : Century Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership From Roosevelt to Reagan. 2e édition. New York : Free Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. 1978. Memories. Montréal : Stanké.Google Scholar
Patrick, John J. et al. 2000. The Oxford Guide to the US Government. New York : Berckley Books.Google Scholar
Romero, David W. 2001. «Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote». Presidential Studies Quarterly, vol. 31, nº 3 (septembre), 454–63.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee et Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1997. «The ‘Veepstakes’: Strategic Choice in Presidential Running Mate Selection». American Political Science Review, vol. 91, nº 4 (décembre), 855–64.Google Scholar
Smith, Richard N. 1997. «‘You Can Be President Someday’: Richard M. Nixon as Vice President». Dans At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the 20th Century. Walch, Timothy, dir., Columbia : University of Missouri Press, 79–87.Google Scholar
Toner, Brendan. 2004. Trusted Assistants: A Look at the Governing and Reelection Roles of the Vice President. Mémoire de maîtrise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, juillet, [http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-07072004-103231/unrestricted/Thesis.pdf]Google Scholar
Untermeyer, Chase. 1997. «Looking Forward: George Bush as Vice President». Dans At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the 20th Century. Walch, Timothy, dir., Columbia : University of Missouri Press, 157–68.Google Scholar
Walch, Timothy, dir. 1997. At the President's Side: The Vice Presidency in the 20th Century. Columbia : University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Witcover, Jules. 1992. Crapshoot: Rolling the Dice on the Vice Presidency. New York : Crown Publishing.Google Scholar