Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T05:20:12.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Representation Per Capita on the Distribution of Federal Spending and Income Taxes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2005

Tom A. Evans
Tom A. Evans
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract. A vote-maximizing incumbent government is expected to adjust discretionary spending and taxation in ways that increase its probability for re-election. Unequal voters per electoral district in Canada distort this calculation in favour of small electoral districts. Using two measures of federal expenditures, and one of income taxes, between the years 1961–2000, empirical estimates indicate that greater representation per capita (lower relative electoral district populations) results in higher federal spending, and lower income taxes, per capita, even after controlling for income and unemployment.

Résumé. Un gouvernement en place tentant de maximiser les votes en sa faveur est censé ajuster les dépenses discrétionnaires et les impôts de manière à augmenter la probabilité de sa réélection. L'inégalité du nombre d'électeurs des districts électoraux au Canada crée une distorsion en faveur des districts de petite taille. En utilisant deux mesures des dépenses fédérales et une mesure des impôts sur le revenu entre 1961 et 2000, nos résultats empiriques montrent qu'une plus forte représentation par habitant (plus petits districts électoraux) entraîne des dépenses fédérales plus importantes et des impôts sur le revenu moins élevés par personne, même en contrôlant pour le revenu et le taux de chômage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 263 - 285
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, S., A. Gerber and J.M. Snyder. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and the Distribution of Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96–4: 767–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlas, Cary M., Thomas W. Gilligan, Robert J. Hendershott and Mark A. Zupan. 1995. “Slicing the Federal Government Net Spending Pie: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why.” American Economic Review 85–3: 624–29.Google Scholar
Canada. Elections Canada. 1979. Thirty-First General Election. Report of the Chief Electoral Officer: Pursuant to subsections 58(9) of the Canada Elections Act. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Elections Canada. 1984. Thirty-Third General Election. Report of the Chief Electoral Officer: Pursuant to subsections 58(9) of the Canada Elections Act. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Elections Canada. 1988. Thirty-Fourth General Election. Report of the Chief Electoral Officer: Pursuant to subsections 58(9) of the Canada Elections Act. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Elections Canada. 1993. Thirty-Fifth General Election. Official Voting Results. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Elections Canada. 1997. Thirty-Sixth General Election. Official Voting Results. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Elections Canada. 2000. Thirty-Seventh General Election. Official Voting Results. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1986–87 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1987–88 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1991–92 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1992–93 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1995–96 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1996–97 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1998–99 Public Accounts.
Canada. Receiver General for Canada. (n.d.). Sections 5, 6 and 7 1999–2000 Public Accounts.
Ferejohn, John A. and Keith Krehbiel. 1987. “The Budget Process and the Size of the Budget.” American Journal of Political Science 31–2: 147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, Robert P. 1988. “Federal Assistance and Local Services in the United States: The Evolution of a New Federalist Fiscal Order.” In Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies, ed. Harvey S. Rosen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (for NBER).
Inman, Robert P. and Michael A. Fitts. 1990. “Political Institutions and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the US Historical Record.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6: 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven D. and James M. Snyder. 1997. “The Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Outcomes.” Journal of Political Economy 105–1: 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Andre Blais. 1993. “Explaining Election Outcomes in Canada: Economy and Politics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science XXVI–4: 775–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Richard and Andre Blais. 1995. “Economic Conditions, Leader Evaluations and Election Outcomes in Canada.” Canadian Public Policy XXI–2: 212–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palda, Kristian S. 1975. “The Effect of Expenditures on Political Success.” Journal of Law and Economics 18–3: 745–71.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19–2: 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provincial Economic Accounts. 1988. Historical Issue 1961–1986. Statistics Canada.
Elections Canada. 2004. Representation in the House of Commons of Canada, http://www.elections.ca/scripts/fedrep/federal_e/fed_prlmnt_e.htm.
Snyder, James M., Jr. 1989. “Election Goals and the Allocation of Campaign Resources.” Econometrica 57–3: 637–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M. and Kenneth N. Bickers. 1994. “Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel.” Journal of Politics 56–2: 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taxation Statistics. Editions 1961 to 2000.
Weingast, Barry R., Kenneth A. Shepsle and Christopher Johnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89–4: 642–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar