Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T22:50:44.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rape and Mens Rea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

M.T. Thornton
M.T. Thornton*
Affiliation:
Victoria College, Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea.’ But when is a mens rea? In the last twenty years discussions of this question have been stimulated by controversial decisions in the English House of Lords in the cases of Smith, Morgan and Majewski.

The case of Smith decided that a man might be guilty of murder if a reasonable person, knowing the circumstances, would have foreseen that death would result even if the agent himself did not so foresee. This appeal to the ‘reasonable person’ imports what is known as the ‘objective test’ as opposed to the ‘subjective test’ of the agent's actual foresight or knowledge. The case of Morgan inclined per contra to the subjective test.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume , Volume 8: New Essays in Ethics and Public Policy , 1982 , pp. 119 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Curley, E.M., ‘Excusing Rape,’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5 (1975-76) 325–60.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, and Gross, Hyman (editors), Responsibility (California: Dickenson 1975).Google Scholar
Hacker, P.M.S., and Raz, J. (editors), Law, Morality, and Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977).Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1968).Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony, Free Will and Responsibility (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1978).Google Scholar
Mackie, J.L., Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1977).Google Scholar
Pickard, Toni, ‘Culpable Mistakes and Rape,’ University of Toronto Law journal, 30 (1980) 75–98 and 415-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserstrom, R.A., ‘Hart, H.L.A. and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility,' University of Chicago Law Review, 35 (1967) 92–126.Google Scholar
Wootton, Barbara, Crime and the Criminal Law (London: Stevens 1963).Google Scholar