Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:27:08.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Representation Ring of the Twisted Quantum Double of a Finite Group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

S. J. Witherspoon
S. J. Witherspoon*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3 e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We provide an isomorphism between the Grothendieck ring of modules of the twisted quantum double of a finite group, and a product of centres of twisted group algebras of centralizer subgroups. It follows that this Grothendieck ring is semisimple. Another consequence is a formula for the characters of this ring in terms of representations of twisted group algebras of centralizer subgroups.

Keywords

16G3016S3516W3020C25finite groupHopf algebraquasi-Hopf algebraquantum doublerepresentation ringGrothendieck ringtwisted group algebra
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 48 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1996 , pp. 1324 - 1338
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1996

References

1. Bantay, P., Orbifolds, Hopf algebras, and the moonshine, Lett. Math. Phys. 22(1991), 187–194.Google Scholar
2. Benson, D. J., Representations and Cohomology I: Basic representation theory of finite groups and associative algebras, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991.Google Scholar
3. Benson, D. J. and Parker, R. A., The Green ring of a finite group, J. Algebra 87(1984), 290–331.Google Scholar
4. Chari, V. and Pressley, A., A Guide to Quantum Groups, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.Google Scholar
5. Conlon, S. B., Twisted group algebras and their representations, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 4(1964), 152–173.Google Scholar
6. Curtis, C. W. and Reiner, I., Methods of Representation Theory with Applications to Finite Groups and Orders, Volume I, Wiley, 1981.Google Scholar
7. Dijkgraaf, R., Pasquier, V., and Roche, P., Quasi Hopf algebras, group cohomology and orbifold models, Nuclear Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 18B(1990), 60–72.Google Scholar
8. Dong, C. and Mason, G., On the operator content ofnilpotent orbifold models, preprint, 1994.Google Scholar
9. Drinfel'd, V. G., Quantum groups. In: Proc. Int. Congr. Math, at Berkeley, Amer. Math. Soc, 1986, 798–820.Google Scholar
10. Drinfel'd, V. G., Quasi-Hopf algebras, Leningrad Math. J. 1(1990), 1419–1457.Google Scholar
11. Isaacs, I. M., Character Theory of Finite Groups, Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
12. Karpilovsky, G., Projective Representations of Finite Groups, Marcel Dekker, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Lorenz, M. and Passman, D. S., Two applications of Maschke's Theorem, Comm. Alg. 8(1980), 1853–1866.Google Scholar
14. Mason, G., The quantum double of a finite group and its role in conformalfield theory. In: Groups ‘93, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes 212, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995, 409–417.Google Scholar
15. Montgomery, S., Hopf Algebras and Their Actions on Rings, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Math. 82, Amer. Math. Soc, 1993.Google Scholar
16. Witherspoon, S. J., The Representation Ring of the Quantum Double of a Finite Group, J. Algebra 179(1996), 305–329.Google Scholar