Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:36:15.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Intertwining Result for p-adic Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Jeffrey D. Adler  and
Alan Roche
Jeffrey D. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-4002, U.S.A. email: [email protected]
Alan Roche
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-1058, U.S.A. email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For a reductive $p$-adic group $G$, we compute the supports of the Hecke algebras for the $K$-types for $G$ lying in a certain frequently-occurring class. When $G$ is classical, we compute the intertwining between any two such $K$-types.

Keywords

22E5020G05
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , 01 June 2000 , pp. 449 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[1] Adler, J. D., Refined anisotropic K-types and supercuspidal representations. Pacific J. Math. (1) 185(1998), 1–32.Google Scholar
[2] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P. C., The admissible dual of GL(N) via compact open subgroups. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1993.Google Scholar
[3] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P. C., Smooth representations of reductive p-adic groups: structure theory via types. Proc. LondonMath. Soc. (3) 77(1998), 582–634.Google Scholar
[4] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P. C., Semisimple types in GL n. CompositioMath. (1) 119(1999), 53–97.Google Scholar
[5] Casselman, W., Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of p-adic reductive groups. Preprint.Google Scholar
[6] Corwin, L., Representations of division algebras over local fields. Adv. in Math. 13(1974), 259–267.Google Scholar
[7] Howe, R., Some qualitative results on the representation theory of GL n over a p-adic field. Pacific J. Math (2) 73(1977), 479–538.Google Scholar
[8] Howe, R., Tamely ramified supercuspidal representations of GL n. Pacific J. Math. (2) 73(1977), 437–460.Google Scholar
[9] Howe, R. and Moy, A., Minimal K-types for GL n over a p-adic field . Astérisque 171–172 (1989), 257–273.Google Scholar
[10] Howe, R. and Moy, A., Hecke algebra isomorphisms for GL n over a p-adic field. J. Algebra (2) 131(1990), 388–424.Google Scholar
[11] Howe, R. (with the collaboration of A. Moy), Harish-Chandra homomorphisms for p-adic groups. CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 59, Amer.Math. Soc., Providence, 1985.Google Scholar
[12] Mautner, F. I., Spherical functions over p-adic fields II. Amer. J. Math. 86(1964), 171–200.Google Scholar
[13] Morris, L., Level zero G-types. CompositioMath. 118(1999), 135–157.Google Scholar
[14] Morris, L., Tamely ramified supercuspidal representations of classical groups II: representation theory. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 25(1992), 233–274.Google Scholar
[15] Morris, L., Tamely ramified intertwining algebras. Invent.Math. 114(1993), 1–54.Google Scholar
[16] Moy, A., Representations of GSp(4) over a p-adic field I and II. CompositioMath. 66(1988), 237–328.Google Scholar
[17] Moy, A. and Prasad, G., Unrefined minimal K-types for p-adic groups. Invent.Math. 116(1994), 393–408.Google Scholar
[18] Moy, A. and Prasad, G., Jacquet functors and unrefined minimal K-types. Comment.Math. Helvetici 71(1996), 98–121.Google Scholar
[19] Pan, S.-Y. and Yu, J.-K., Unrefined minimal K-types for p-adic classical groups. Preprint, 1997.Google Scholar
[20] Prasad, G. and Raghunathan, M. S., Topological central extensions of semi-simple groups over local fields I. Ann. of Math. 119(1984), 143–201.Google Scholar
[21] Roche, A., Types and Hecke algebras for principal series representations of split reductive p-adic groups. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 31(1998), 361–413.Google Scholar
[22] Rousseau, G., Immeubles des groupes réductifs sur les corps locaux. Ph.D. thesis, Paris XI, 1977.Google Scholar
[23] Shalika, J., Representations of the two by two unimodular group over local fields. Seminar on representations of Lie groups, Institute for Advanced Study, 1965.Google Scholar
[24] Springer, T., Reductive groups . Automorphic forms, representations, and L-functions, Providence, (eds., Borel, A. and Casselman, W.), Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 33, part 1, Amer.Math. Soc., 1979, 3–27.Google Scholar
[25] Springer, T. and Steinberg, R., Conjugacy classes . Seminar on Algebraic Groups and Related Finite Groups, Berlin, (eds., Borel, A. and Carter, R. et al), LectureNotes in Math. 131, Springer, 1970, 167–266.Google Scholar
[26] Steinberg, R., Torsion in reductive groups , Adv. in Math. 15(1975), 63–92.Google Scholar
[27] Tanaka, Shun’ichi, On irreducible unitary representations of some special linear groups of the second order. I, II. Osaka J. Math. 3(1966), 217–227. 229–242.Google Scholar
[28] Yu, J.-K., Tame construction of supercuspidal representations. Preprint, 1998.Google Scholar