Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:42:26.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Raymond Hickey, ed. Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pp. ix + 286. US$65.00 (hardcover).

Review products

Raymond Hickey, ed. Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2003. Pp. ix + 286. US$65.00 (hardcover).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Marc Pierce*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37:1043–1068.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D. 2001. Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality’: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23:265–340.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2001. Is there such a thing as grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23:163–186.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 2000. Change, chance, and optimality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey, and Kaufman, Terrence S.. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar