Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:06:01.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic Resistance on the Maine-New Brunswick Border

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Wendy Burnett
Wendy Burnett*
Affiliation:
Mount Allison University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prior studies have established that the Atlantic region of Canada constitutes a dialect zone. Data from the Dialect Topography of New Brunswick, gathered from 2001 to 2003, permit a comparison of linguistic trends in this part of the Atlantic region with those observed in the Golden Horseshoe region of Ontario. In both cases, there is a convergence towards American forms. However, at a certain point on the border between New Brunswick and Maine, where there is significant social contact between Canadians and Americans, the data suggest that Canadian youth are resisting adoption of several American forms. The present study considers this border effect in the responses of 14–19-year-olds living in St. Stephen, New Brunswick, and in the adjacent town of Calais, Maine. Sixteen items identified as Canadian/American shibboleths in the Golden Horseshoe study are examined, and the results are assessed in relation to the Boberg’s (2000) claims regarding geo-linguistic diffusion.

Résumé

Résumé

Les études précédentes ont établit que la région atlantique du Canada constitue une zone dialectale distincte. Les données du Dialect Topography of New Brunswick, recueillies entre 2001 et 2003, permettent la comparaison des tendances linguistiques de cette région atlantique avec celles observées dans la région du Golden Horseshoe en Ontario. Dans les deux cas, il y a convergence vers les formes américaines. Cependant, à un certain point sur la frontière entre le Nouveau-Brunswick et le Maine, où il y a un contact social significatif entre canadiens et américains, les données suggèrent que la jeunesse canadienne résiste à l’adoption de plusieurs formes américaines. La présente étude considère cet effet frontalier dans les réponses de jeunes âgés de 14 à 19 ans qui habitent St. Stephen, au Nouveau-Brunswick, et le village avoisinant de Calais, situé dans le Maine. Seize items identifiés comme étant des schibboleths canadiens/américains dans l’étude du Golden Horseshoe sont examinés, et les résultats sont discutés par rapport aux conclusions de Boberg (2000) ayant trait à la diffusion géo-linguistique.

Type
Dialect Topography
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 51 , Issue 2-3: Canadian English in a Global Context , November 2006 , pp. 161 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Michael. 2004. Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada, and the myth of converging values. Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bateman, Stanley C.E. 1975. Survey of Canadian English: A comparison of the language patterns of English-speaking New Brunswickers at two different levels of education. Master’s thesis, University of New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2000. Geolinguistic diffusion and the U.S.-Canada border. Language Variation and Change 12:1–14.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles. 2005. Dialect Topography of Montreal. English World-Wide 25:171–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Wendy. 2001. New Brunswick English and the American standard: Evidence of convergence. In Papers of the twenty-third annual meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, ed. Mopoho, Raymond, 60–70. Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 1994. An introduction to Dialect Topography. English World-Wide 15:35–53.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 1998, a. Social embedding of changes in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 26:3–36.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 1998, b. Inferring dialect from a postal questionnaire. Journal of English Linguistics 26:222–246.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2004. ‘Canadian dainty’: The rise and decline of Briticisms in Canada. In Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in transported dialects, ed. Hickey, Raymond, 224–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K., and Heisler, Troy. 1999. Dialect Topography of Québec City English. Canadian Journal of Linguisticsitalics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 44:23–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K., and Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. 1993. The Americanization of Canadian pronunciation: A survey of palatal glide usage. In Focus on Canada, ed. Clarke, Sandra, 85–108. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davey, William, 1985. The stressed vowel phonemes of a New Brunswick idiolect and Centre Prairie Canadian English. In Papers of the ninth annual meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association, ed. Falk, Lilian, Flikeid, Karin, and Harry, Margaret, 25–32. Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert J. 1973. The linguistic survey of British Columbia: The Kootenay region. In Canadian languages in their social context, ed. Darnell, Regna, 105–116. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Kinloch, A. Murray. 1975. Twenty-eight years of development of front vowels in a New Brunswick community. Paper read at the VIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Leeds.Google Scholar
Kinloch, A. Murray, and Fazilah, Ismail. 1993. Canadian raising: /au/ in Fredericton, New Brunswick. Linguistica Atlantica 15:105–114.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, S., and Boberg, C.. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, Corey. 1989. The United-States-Canadian Border as a linguistic boundary: The English language in Calais, Maine and St. Stephen, New Brunswick. Honours thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Panster, Jack. 2001. The vanguard of linguistic change in a dialect survey of the Golden Horseshoe. Paper read at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 32, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Scargill, M.H., and Warkentyne, H.. 1972. The survey of Canadian English: A report. English Quarterly 5(3):47–104.Google Scholar
Woods, Howard B. 1993. A synchronie study of English spoken in Ottawa: Is Canadian English becoming more American? In Focus on Canada, ed. Clarke, Sandra, 151–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zeller, Christine. 1990. Dialect variants from Toronto to Milwaukee. Master’s thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Zeller, Christine. 1993. Linguistic symmetries, asymmetries, and border effects within a Canadian/American sample. In Focus on Canada, ed. Clarke, Sandra, 179–200. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar