Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:14:40.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Issues in the Metalinguistic Representation of French Tense and Aspect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Philippe Bourdin
Philippe Bourdin*
Affiliation:
York University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Just over a decade ago, Catherine Fuchs and Anne-Marie Léonard (henceforth, F and L) co-authored Vers une théorie des aspects (Fuchs and Léonard 1979), a monograph on the tense and aspect systems of French and English. Although fairly influential among French linguists, their work has been largely ignored by scholars outside France. There is nothing surprising in this: indeed, the theoretical framework chosen by F and L, namely Antoine Culioli’s théorie des opérations énonciatives (‘theory of speaker-based operations’), has hitherto met with much the same fate. I do not wish to go into the epistemological, cultural or attitudinal reasons for this state of affairs. The scope of the present article is actually very restricted. My purpose will be to delineate, in deliberately informal terms, some of the critical problems that are to be encountered by anyone attempting to construct a formalized or semi-formalized representation of French tense and aspect. F and L’s book happens to be such an attempt, certainly the most explicit and comprehensive one in recent years.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 269 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamczewski, Henri 1976 Be + ing dans la grammaire de l’anglais contemporain. Thèse de doctorat d’État, Université Paris III.Google Scholar
Adamczewski, Henri, and Delmas, Claude 1982 Grammaire linguistique de l’anglais. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile 1966a Les relations de temps dans le verbe français. Pp. 237–250 in Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile 1966b «Être» et «avoir» dans leurs fonctions linguistiques. Pp. 187–207 in Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile 1974 L’appareil formel de l’énonciation. Pp. 79–88 in Problèmes de linguistique générale II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bouscaren, Janine, Byramjee, Béatrice, Chuquet, Jean, Cottier, Élisabeth, Demaizière, Françoise, Filhol-Duchet, Bénédicte, Herlin, Olivier, and Mayer, Anne 1982 Cahiers de recherche en grammaire anglaise, Tome I. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bouscaren, Janine, and Chuquet, Jean 1987 Grammaire et textes anglais (Guide pour l’analyse linguistique). Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard 1976 Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine 1983 Rôle des représentations métalinguistiques en syntaxe. Pp. 59–73 in Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Hattori, Shiro and Inoue, Kazuko, eds. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine 1985 The Concept of Notional Domain. Pp. 79–87 in Language Invariants and Mental Operations. Seiler, Hansjakob and Brettschneider, Gunter, eds. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Danon-Boileau, Laurent 1982 Produire le fictif. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Desclés, Jean-Pierre 1989 State, Event, Process, and Topology. General Linguistics 29:159–200.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne 1982 The Future in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, James 1970 A Grammar of Aspect: Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franckel, Jean-Jacques 1984 Futur «simple» et futur «proche». Le français dans le monde 182:65–70.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine 1978 L’aspect, un problème de linguistique générale: éléments de réponse dans une perspective énonciative. Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande (DRLAV, Vincennes) 16:1–30.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine, and Léonard, Anne-Marie 1979 Vers une théorie des aspects (Les systèmes du français et de l’anglais). Paris: Mouton and École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Grunig, Blanche-Noëlle 1981 Plusieurs pragmatiques. DRLAV 25:101–118.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert 1990 As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joly, André, and Lerouge, Marie-Josée 1980 Problèmes de l’analyse du temps en psychomécanique. Pp. 7–35 in La psychomécanique et les théories de renonciation. Joly, André, ed. Lille: Presses de l’Université de Lille.Google Scholar
Laurendeau, Paul 1990 Vers une typologie des tendanciels discursifs. Protée 18:125–133.Google Scholar
Monville-Burston, Monique, and Waugh, Linda 1986 Aspect and Discourse Function: The French Simple Past in Newspaper Usage. Language 62:846–877.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans 1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Valin, Roch 1964 La méthode comparative en linguistique historique et en psychomécanique du langage. Québec: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Vasilenko, E., Yegorova, A., and Lamm, E. 1982 Russian Verb Aspects. Moscow: Russian Language Publishers.Google Scholar
Vassant, Annette 1988 Passé simple et passé composé chez É. Benveniste et G. Guillaume. Modèles linguistiques 19:113–129.Google Scholar
Vet, Co 1980 Temps, aspects et adverbes de temps en français contemporain (Essai de sémantique formelle). Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Veyrenc, Charles-Jacques 1968 Grammaire du russe. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar