Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T18:58:22.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laurence R. Horn et Gregory Ward, eds. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford : Blackwell, 2004. Pp. xix + 842. 157,95$US (relié).

Review products

Laurence R. Horn et Gregory Ward, eds. The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford : Blackwell, 2004. Pp. xix + 842. 157,95$US (relié).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

Paul Pupier*
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews/Comptes rendus
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Linguistic Association/Association canadienne de linguistique 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Références

Asher, Nicholas et Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1942. Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V. 1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554377Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using language. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian, ed. 1997. The handbook of sociolinguistics. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63:805–855.Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1973. La preuve et le dire. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and semantic structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6:353–375.Google Scholar
Horn, Lawrence. 1984. Ambiguity, negation, and the London School of Parsimony. NELS 14:108–131.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1999. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Sous la dir. Beauchamp, de Tom L.. New York : Oxford University Press. [1748]Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans et Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. 1997. Linguistic etiquette. In The handbook of sociolinguistics, ed. Coulmas, Florian, 374–385. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax : Anaphora, discourse and empathy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Explicature explicated. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:722–723.10.1017/S0140525X00055473Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1989. Relevance. Journal of Linguistics 27:107–161.10.1017/S0022226700012433Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3:1–29.Google Scholar
Moeschler, Jacques et Reboul, Anne. 1994. Dictionnaire encyclopédique de pragmatique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya et Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24:657–720.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan et Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance : Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford : Blackwell.Google Scholar