Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T02:46:10.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Some Appendices to the Rowell-Sirois Report: V. Dominion Monetary Policy, 1929-19341

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

G. A. Elliott
G. A. Elliott*
Affiliation:
The University of Alberta
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1941 , pp. 88 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Dominion Monetary Policy, 1929-1934: A Study Prepared for the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations. By KnoxF. A.. Ottawa: King's Printer. 1939. Pp. vii, 93 (mimeo.). 50c.

References

2 Report of the Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations (Ottawa, 1939), pp. 231–2.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., p. 232.

4 To be sure, the increased revenues of domestic producers of commodities also imported would come from other domestic incomes as the memorandum suggests. But, in addition, the rise in the prices of commodities partly imported, if accompanied by appropriate domestic credit policies, would probably have had cumulative effects.

6 Cf. Mackintosh, W. A., The Economic Background of Dominion-Provincial Relations (Ottawa, 1939), p. 99 Google Scholar: “These policies [including monetary and tariff policies] had, however, the important effect of increasing the need for interregional transfers of income.”

7 Italics are the reviewer's.