Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T22:32:59.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on the Concentration Controversy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2014

Gideon Rosenbluth
Gideon Rosenbluth*
Affiliation:
Queens University
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Memoranda
Information
Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 1959 , pp. 336 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Political Science Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

G. Rosenbluth, Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries (Princeton, 1957); S. Stykolt, “The Measurement and Causes of Concentration,” this Journal, XXIV, no. 3, Aug., 1958, 415–19; K. Buckley, “On Rosenbluth's ‘Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries’” and S. Stykolt, “A Comment,” this Journal, XXV, no. 2, May, 1959, 195–200, 200–4. These four documents will be referred to as “book,” “review,” “reply,” and “rejoinder,” respectively.

References

* G. Rosenbluth, Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries (Princeton, 1957); S. Stykolt, “The Measurement and Causes of Concentration,” this Journal, XXIV, no. 3, Aug., 1958, 415–19; K. Buckley, “On Rosenbluth's ‘Concentration in Canadian Manufacturing Industries’” and S. Stykolt, “A Comment,” this Journal, XXV, no. 2, May, 1959, 195–200, 200–4. These four documents will be referred to as “book,” “review,” “reply,” and “rejoinder,” respectively.