Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:40:16.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of the Life-History and Habits of Musca autumnalis DeGeer (Diptera: Muscidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H. J. Teskey
H. J. Teskey
Affiliation:
Entomology Laboratory, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Guelph, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It was of interest but no great concern when the finding of Musca autumnalis DeGeer in Nova Scotia was reported by Vockeroth (1953). Previously, M. domestica Linnaeus was thought to be the only species of the genus present in North America. Two previous reports of M. autumnalis as corvina (Walker, 1849, 1871) were thought to be misidentifications.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 5 , May 1960 , pp. 360 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Service. 1959. A Muscid (Musca autumnalis). Co-op. Econ. Ins. Rept., U.S.D.A. Washington, D.C. 9: 634, 737, 756, 759, 810, 832, 850, 869, 904.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. 1940. Report on terminology in malaria. Bull. Hlth. Org. L.O.N. 9: 131–246. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 29: 92. 1941).Google Scholar
Curran, C. H. 1934. The families and genera of North American Diptera. Ballou Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Derveneva-Ukhova, V. P. 1940. On the ecology of dung flies in Kabarda (in Russian). Med. Parasit. 9: 323–339. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 31: 124. 1943).Google Scholar
Derbeneva-Ukhova, V. P. 1942. On the development of ovaries and on the imaginal nutrition in dung flies (in Russian). Med. Parasit. 11: 85–97. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 32: 118. 1944).Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. 1916. Some experiments on the house fly in relation to the farm manure heap. J. Agr. Sci. 7: 443–457.Google Scholar
Emden, F. J. van. 1939. Muscidae: Muscinae and Stomoxydinae. Ruwenzori Expedition, 1934–35. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London 2: 49–89.Google Scholar
Froggatt, W. W. 1917. “Policeman flies”, fossorial wasps that catch flies. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales 28: 667–669.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1916. Observations on the habits and parasites of common flies. Parasitology 8: 440–544.Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1918. Hibernation of flies in a Lincolnshire house. Parasitology 11: 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1919. Further observations on the habits and parasites of common flies. Parasitology 11: 347–384.Google Scholar
Hammer, O. 1942. Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement (in English). Vidensk. Medd. Dansk. Naturh. Foren., Kbh. 105: 141–393.Google Scholar
Kearns, H. G. H. 1942. The control of flies in country and town. Ann. Appl. Biol. 29: 310–313.Google Scholar
Kobayaski, H. 1919. Flies in Korea. Report 1 (in Korean). J. Chosen Med. Soc. No. 24. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 7: 142. 1919).Google Scholar
Lamborn, W. A. 1937. The haematophagous fly, Musea sorbens Wied., in relation to the transmission of leprosy, J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40: 37–42.Google Scholar
MacNay, C. G., compiler. 1957, 1958. A muscid (Musca autumnalis DeG). Canadian Ins. Pest Rev., Canada Dept. Agr. 35: 247, 267, 270; 36: 294.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1925. Exotic Muscaridae (Diptera). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (9) 16: 369.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1929. Exotic Muscaridae (Diptera). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (10) 4: 110.Google Scholar
Mer, G. G. 1936. Experimental study on the development of the ovary in Anopheles elutus Edw. (Dipt. Culic). Bull. Ent. Res. 27: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, L. 1925. Diptères “buviers de sang” et diptères “succeurs de sueur”. Leur association possible dans la propogation de certaines maladies d'origine microbienne. C.R. Soc. Biol. 92: 135–136. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 13: 50. 1925).Google Scholar
Okamota, H. 1924. The insect fauna of Quelport Island (Saishiuto). Bull. Agric. Expt. Sta. Chosen 1: 1–4, 47–233. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 13: 155. 1925).Google Scholar
Osten Sacken, C. R. 1887. On Mr. Portchinsky's publications on the larvae of Muscidae, including a detailed abstract of his last paper: comparative biology of the necrophagous and coprophagous larvae. Berl. Ent. Z. 31: 17–27.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1932. Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance: a revision of the species of the genus Musca based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. I. The natural grouping of the species and their relationship to each other. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 26: 347–405.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1933. Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the genera of the tribe Muscini, subfamily Muscinae, based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. I. The genus Musca Linnaeus. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 27: 135–156.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1933b. Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Musca, based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. II. A practical guide to the Palaearctic species. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 27: 327–345, 397–430.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1936. Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Musca, based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. III. A practical guide to the Ethiopian species. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 30: 469–490.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S. 1937. Studies on the higher Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. A revision of the species of the genus Musca, based on a comparative study of the male terminalia. IV. A practical guide to the Oriental species. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 31: 127–140, 195–213.Google Scholar
Patton, W. S., and Cragg, F. W. 1913. On certain haematophagous species of the genus Musca with descriptions of two new species. Indian J. Med. Res. 1: 11–25.Google Scholar
Portchinsky, I. 1885. Muscarium cadaverinum stercorariumque biologia comparata (in Russian). Hor. Ent. Ross. 19: 210–244. (cited by Osten Sacken, 1887).Google Scholar
Reh, L. 1927. Ungewohnliches Massen-Vorkammen von Fliegen in Hausern. Z. Desinfekt. 6. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 15: 174. 1927).Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. 1927. Sur l'hibernation de quelques mouches communes. Bull. Soc. Ent. France 1927: 24–25. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 15: 85. 1927).Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1956. Musca autumnalis in upstate New York. Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 58: 347.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1959a. Musca autumnalis DeGeer in Virginia (Diptera, Muscidae). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 61: 6.Google Scholar
Sabrosky, C. W. 1959b. Musca autumnalis in the central states. J. Econ. Ent. 52: 1030.Google Scholar
Stephens, J. W. W. 1905. Two cases of intestinal myiasis. Thomp. Yates Labs. Rep. 6: 119–121.Google Scholar
Thomsen, M. 1938. The housefly (Musca domestica) and the stable fly (Stomoxys calcitrans). Investigations on their biology and control, with a review of other species of flies associated with domestic animals or dwellings (in Danish). Veretn. Vet.-og Landbohojsk, Kbh., no. 176, 352 pp.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1915. Correction of the misuse of the generic name Musca, with descriptions of two new genera, J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 5: 433.Google Scholar
Townsend, C. H. T. 1921. Some new muscoid genera, ancient and recent. Insec. lnscit. Menst. 9: 132.Google Scholar
Vainshtein, B. A., and Rodova, R. A. 1940. Les lieux de development des mouches de fumier dans les conditions du Tadjikistan montagneux (in Russian). Med. Parasit. 9: 364–368. (Rev. Appl. Ent. (B) 31: 126. 1943).Google Scholar
Vockeroth, J. R. 1953. Musca autumnalis Deg. in North America (Diptera: Muscidae). Canadian Ent. 85: 422–423.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1849. List of the specimens of Dipterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Pt. 4 British Museum. London, (cited by Vockeroth, , 1953).Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1871. Notes on some insects of Nova Scotia and Canada. Canadian Ent. 3: 141–144.Google Scholar
West, L. S. 1951. The Housefly. Its natural history, medical importance, and control. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar