Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:15:24.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE GENUS EPHORON*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Herman T. Spieth
Herman T. Spieth
Affiliation:
College of the City of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Williamson (1802) described the white fly Ephoron leukon. From his description of the insect and its habits, recent workers have been able to identify the species correctly. Hagen (1863) suggested that Baetis alba Say is a synonym of E. leukon Williamson. Eaton (1871, p. 124) was undecided as to the identity of E. leukon. In 1883 (p. 47), however, he indicated that leukon is a synonym of albus Say, which he considered to be a member of the genus Polymitarcys. This genus he had erected in 1868, employing Ephemera virgo Oliver as the genotype.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 72 , Issue 6 , June 1940 , pp. 109 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Williamson, , 1802, Trans. Amer. Philo. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, , 1863, Proc. Ent. Soc. Phila., vol. 2, p. 170.Google Scholar
Eaton, , 1868, Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. 5, p. 84.Google Scholar
Eaton, , 1871, Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., part 1, p. 124.Google Scholar
Vayassiere, , 1882, Ann. Sci. Nat., series 6, Zoology 13, pp. 43–46, pl. 2.Google Scholar
Eaton, , 1883–1884, Revisional Mono. Rec. Ephemeridae, part 1, pp. 43–47, pls. 6 and 28.Google Scholar
McDunnough, , 1926, Canad. Ent., vol. 58, pp. 184–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenemund, , 1930, Tierwelt Deutschlands, part 19, pp. 10–12, 71–72.Google Scholar
Ueno, , 1931, Annot. Zool. Japonenses, vol. 13, pp. 189–191.Google Scholar
Ulmer, , 1932, Stett. Ent. Zeit., vol. 93, pp. 205–208.Google Scholar
Ulmer, , 1932–1933, Peking Nat. Hist. Bull., vol. 7, p. 197.Google Scholar
Ide, , 1935, Canad. Ent., vol. 67, pp. 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiensuu, , 1935, Ann. Ento. Fennici., vol. 1. pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
Traver, , 1935, Biology of Mayflies, pp. 243–245.Google Scholar
Lestage, , 1938, Bull. Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg., vol. 73, pp. 381–394.Google Scholar