Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:30:02.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attractiveness of Different Foods and Flowers to the Adults of some Hymenopterous Parasites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. Leius
K. Leius
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many attempts to establish introduced parasites in Canada failed though the climatic conditions at their release points were apparently similar to those of their native habitats (Thorpe, 1930; Baird et al., 1947). It is known that many adults of hymenopterous parasites feed on flowers, aphid honeydew, host body fluids, and other substances (Jackson, 19 37; Thorpe and Caudle: 1938; Schneider, 1939; Györfi, 1945, 1951; Zoebelein, 1956). This brings up the possibility that nourishment from one or more of the above sources is necessary for surviial and reproduction, and that some of the failures may have been because of the absence or scarcity of suitable adult food (Clausen. 1956). At present data on the food preferences of adult hymenopterous parasites are scarce. Except for a few field and laboratory observations, there are no experiments that demonstrate distinct preferences for one food over another. The results of the experiments described in the present paper demonstrate that adults of the species studied have preferences for some flowers and food substances tested.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 5 , May 1960 , pp. 369 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, A. P. 1956. The indigenous parasites of the European pine shoot moth Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.) in Ontario. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Ohio State University. 96 pp.Google Scholar
Baird, A. B., Finlayson, L. R., Graham, A. R., and Wilkes, A.. 1947. Control of forest insects in the Province of Ontario by introduction of insect parasites. Canada Dept. Agr. Parasite Investigation Unit, Div. of Ent. 83 pp.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1956. Biological control of insect pests in the Continental United States. United States Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 1139.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P., King, J. L., and Teranishi, C.. 1927. The parasites of Popillia japonica in Japan and Cyosen (Korea) and their introduction into the United States. United States Dept. Agr. Bull. 1429: 33–41.Google Scholar
Flanders, S. E. 1935. An apparent correlation between the feeding habits of certain pteromalids and the condition of their ovarian follicles. Ann. Ent. Soc. America 28: 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, T. R. 1938. Influence of feeding habits of Tiphia vernalis on the parasitization on the Japanese beetle, J. Econ. Ent. 31: 204–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Györfi, J. 1945. Beobachtungen über die Ernährung der Schlupfwespenimagos. Erdeszeti Kiserletek 45: 100–112, Sopron, Hungary.Google Scholar
Györfi, J. 1951. Die Schlupfwespen und der Unterwuchs des Waldes. Z. Angew. Ent. 33: 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. J. 1937. Host selection in Pimpla examinator F. (Hymenoptera). Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London 12 (A): 81–91.Google Scholar
Johnston, F. A. 1913. On the feeding habits of Pimpla (Itoplectis) conquisitor Say. J. Econ. Ent. 6: 144–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. L., and Holloway, J. K.. 1930. Tiphia popilliavora Rohwer, a parasite of the Japanese beetle. United States Dept. Agr. Circ. 145, 11 pp.Google Scholar
Kugler, H. 1955. Einführung in die Blütenökologie. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, Germany. 277 pp.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C. F. W.Krombein, H. K., and Townes, H. K.. 1951. Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. United States Gov. Printing Office, Washington, 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Schneider, F. 1939. Ein Vergleich von Urwald und Monokultur in Bezug auf ihre Gefährdung durch phytophage Insekten, auf Grund einiger Beobachtungen an der Ostküste von Sumatra. Schweizerische Z. Forstwesen 90: 41–55, 82–89.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. 1930. Observations on the parasites of the pine-shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana Schiff. Bull. Ent. Res. 21: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, W. H., and Caudle, H. B.. 1938. A study of the olfactory responses of insect parasite to the food plant of their host. Parasitology 30: 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townes, H. 1958. Some biological characteristics of the Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) in relation to biological control, J. Econ. Ent. 51: 650–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, W. 1953. Nutrition. In Insect Physiology, ed. by Roeder, K. D., pp. 350–386. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Zoebelein, G. 1956. Der Honigtau als Nahrung der Insekten II. Z. Angew. Ent. 39: 129–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar