Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:53:09.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expert Testimony by a Bioethicist

Perspectives and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2017

JOHN J. PARIS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Departments and Columns
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 469 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The Caduceus in Court welcomes readers to submit papers on legal updates and discussions of issues in healthcare law to Jennifer Chandler at [email protected] and Ben Rich at [email protected].

References

Notes

1. Jonsen, AR. The Birth of Bioethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar

2. In re Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976).

3. Joseph and Julia Quinlan, Karen Ann: The Quinlan’s Tell Their Story. New York: Doubleday; 1977.

4. de Tocqueville, A. (Schiefer J, trans.) Democracy in America. London: Saunders and Otley; 1835.Google Scholar

5. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan, An Alleged Incompetent. 70 N.J. 10; 355 A.2d 647 (1976).

6. Delgado, R, McAllen, P. The moralist as expert witness. Boston University Law Review. 1982;62:869–926.Google Scholar

7. Fletcher, JC. Bioethics in a legal forum: confessions of an expert witness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1999;22:297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Sharpe, VA, Pellegrino, ED. Medical ethics in the courtroom: A reappraisal. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997;22:323–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz 373 Mass 728, 370 N.E. 2d 417 (1977).

10. Cowley C. A new rejection of moral expertise. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2005;8:273–9.

11. Scofield, GR. Ethics consultation: The least dangerous profession. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics 1993;2(4):417–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

12. Scofield GR. Is the medical ethicist an expert? Bioethics Bulletin 1994;3(1):28.

13. Henley D. The garden of Allah. In: Actual Miles: Henry’s Greatest Hits (1995); available at http://www.wbr.com/donhenley/music.html (last accessed 26 Aug 2016). Cited in Oriola TA. The propriety of expert testimony in the courtroom: A discourse. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law. 2006;6:1–24.

14. Mishkin DB. Proffering bioethicists as experts. Judges Journal 1971:50 ff.

15. Imwinkelried EJ. Expert testimony by ethicists: What should be the norm? Temple Law Review 2003;76:91–128.

16. Chastleton Corp. v. Sinclair, 264 U.S. 543, 548 (1924).

17. Annas, G. Standard of Care: The Law of American Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.Google Scholar

18. Paris JJ. The domination of law in American bioethics: A response to Annas. In Grodin MA, ed. Meta Medical Ethics, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer; 1995.

19. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. Saikewicz. 373 Mass. 728, 370 N.E. 2d 417 (1977).

20. Wigmore, JH. Wigmore on Evidence, 4th ed., Best ed., New York: Aspen Publishers; 2015.

21. Kopelman LM. Bioethics as a second-order discipline: Who is a bioethicist? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2006;31:601–28.

22. Bacchiochi v. Johnson Memorial Hospital. Conn. Superior Court, Hartford, March 18 1982 (unreported bench hearing).

23. In the Matter of Shirley Dinnerstein, 6 Mass App. Ct. 455 (1972).

24. Fletcher J. Bioethics in a legal forum. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997;22:297–324.

25. Kipnis, K. Confessions of an expert ethics witness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1997;22:325–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

26. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, 398 Mass. 417 (1986).

27. Weber v. Stony Brook Hospital, 456 N.E. 2d 1186, 469 N.Y.S. 2d 63 (1983).

28. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006 (1983).

29. In re Jobes, 529 A. 2d 434 N.J. (1987)

30. In re Claire C. Conroy, 98 N.J. 321, 486 A 2d 1209 (1985).

31. Gray v. Romero, 697 F. Sup. 580 R.I. (1988).

32. Cruzan v. Director Missouri Dept. of Health, 497 US 261 (1990).

33. Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of the futility movement. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;343:293–6.

34. Paris JJ, Crone RK, Reardon FE. Physician refusal of requested treatment: The case of Baby L. New England Journal of Medicine 1990;322:1012–5.

35. Matter of Baby K 16 F. 3d 590 (4th Cir. 1994).

36. Paris JJ, Cassen EH, Dec W, Reardon FE. Use of a DNR order over family objections: The case of Gilgunn v. MGH. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 1999;14:41–5.

37. Paris JJ, Billings JA, Cummings B, Moreland MP. Howe v. MGH and Hudson v. Texas Children’s Hospital: Two approaches to resolving family-physician disputes in end-of-life care. Journal of Perinatology 2006;26:726–9; Hudson v. Texas Children’s Hospital 177 SW 3rd 232 (2005).

38. Paris JJ, Goldsmith JP, Cimperman M. Resuscitation of a micropremie: The case of MacDonald v. Milleville,” Journal of Perinatology 1998;18:302–5.

39. Judge Harry Hammer, personal communication, 18 Feb 1981.