No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Closed-Loop Medical Devices Might Reduce Iatrogenic Loss of Autonomous Action Selection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Departments and Columns
- Information
- Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 26 , Special Issue 4: Clinical Neuroethics , October 2017 , pp. 688 - 690
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
Notes
1. Kellmeyer, P, Cochrane, T, Müller, O, Mitchell, C, Ball, T, Fins, JJ, et al. The effects of closed-loop medical devices on the autonomy and accountability of persons and systems. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2016;25(4):623–33.Google Scholar
2. Little, S, Pogosyan, A, Neal, S, Zavala, B, Zrinzo, L, Hariz, M, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease. Annals of Neurology 2013;74:449–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Piña-Fuentes D, Little S, Oterdoom M, Neal S, Pogosyan A, Tijssen MAJ, et al. Adaptive DBS in a Parkinson’s patient with chronically implanted DBS: A proof of principle. Movement Disorders 2017; doi: 10.1002/mds.26959.
4. Little, S, Tripoliti, E, Beudel, M, Pogosyan, A, Cagnan, H, Herz, D, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease demonstrates reduced speech side effects compared to conventional stimulation in the acute setting. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2016;87(12):1388–9.Google Scholar
5. Rosa, M, Arlotti, M, Marceglia, S, Cogiamanian, F, Ardolino, G, Fonzo, AD, et al. Adaptive deep brain stimulation controls levodopa-induced side effects in Parkinsonian patients. Movement Disorders 2017;32:628–9.Google Scholar
6. Jahanshahi, M, Ardouin, CMA, Brown, RG, Rothwell, JC, Obeso, J, Albanese, A, et al. The impact of deep brain stimulation on executive function in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2000;123(6):1142–54.Google Scholar
7. Witt, K, Pulkowski, U, Herzog, J, Lorenz, D, Hamel, W, Deuschl, G, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves cognitive flexibility but impairs response inhibition in Parkinson disease. Archives of Neurology 2004;61:697–700.Google Scholar
8. Frank, MJ, Samanta, J, Moustafa, AA, Sherman, SJ. Hold your horses: Impulsivity, deep brain stimulation, and medication in Parkinsonism. Science 2007;318:1309–12.Google Scholar
9. See note 7, Witt et al. 2004.
10. See note 8, Frank et al. 2007.
11. Castrioto, A, Lhommee, E, Moro, E, Krack, P. Mood and behavioural effects of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurology 2014;13:287–305.Google Scholar
12. Jahanshahi, M, Obeso, I, Baunez, C, Alegre, M, Krack, P. Parkinson’s disease, the subthalamic nucleus, inhibition, and impulsivity. Movement Disorders 2015;30:128–40.Google Scholar
13. Kraemer, F. Me, myself and my brain implant: Deep brain stimulation raises questions of personal authenticity and alienation. Neuroethics 2013;6(3):483–97.Google Scholar
14. See note 6, Jahanshahi et al. 2000.
15. See note 7, Witt et al. 2004.
16. Beudel, M, Oswal, A, Jha, A, Foltynie, T, Zrinzo, L, Hariz, M, et al. Oscillatory beta power correlates with akinesia-rigidity in the Parkinsonian STN. Movement Disorders 2017;32(1):174–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wessel, JR, Ghahremani, A, Udupa, K, Saha, U, Kalia, SK, Hodaie, M, et al. Stop-related subthalamic beta activity indexes global motor suppression in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders 2016;31:1846–53.Google Scholar
18. Feingold, J, Gibson, DJ, DePasquale, B, Graybiel, AM. Bursts of beta oscillation differentiate postperformance activity in the striatum and motor cortex of monkeys performing movement tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2015;112:13,687–92.Google Scholar
19. Tinkhauser, G, Pogosyan, A, Little, S, Beudel, M, Herz, D, Tan, H, et al. The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2017;140:1053–67.Google Scholar
20. See note 17, Wessel et al. 2016.
21. Brittain, JS, Watkins, KE, Joundi, RA, Ray, NJ, Holland, P, Green, AL, et al. A role for the subthalamic nucleus in response inhibition during conflict. Journal of Neuroscience 2012;32:13,396–401.Google Scholar