The Cambridge Law Journal: Volume 69 -

The Cambridge Law Journal

Only show content I have access to (6)

Over 3 years (91)

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
The Cambridge Law Journal
ISSN: 0008-1973

EISSN: 1469-2139

URL: /core/journals/cambridge-law-journal
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

The Cambridge Law Journal

Refine listing

Actions for selected content:

Volume 69 - November 2010

Case and Comment

POLICEMEN BEHAVING BADLY – THE ABUSE OF MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE

STATUTORY DUTIES, ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION AND “CIVIL RIGHTS”

THE GOVERNMENT VERSUS THE OMBUDSMAN: WHAT ROLE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW?

MORE APPEALING JOINT ENTERPRISE

PROPORTIONALITY NOT PRESUMPTION

THE NEW UK SUPREME COURT, THE SEPARATION OF POWERS AND ANTI-TERRORISM MEASURES

ONCE A SEX OFFENDER, ALWAYS A REOFFENDING RISK?

A QUESTION OF FAITH

OUT-OF-COURT (OUT OF SIGHT) DISPOSALS

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION, TORTURE AND THE “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP”

THE RIGHT TO FAMILY LIFE IN EXTRADITION CASES: MORE DEFENDANT-FRIENDLY THAN STRASBOURG REQUIRES

NEGLIGENCE AND DEFENDANTS WITH SPECIAL SKILLS

MESOTHELIOMA AND RISK AIRED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

FAIR TRIALS AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT

RIOTING DETAINEES: WHO PAYS? STATUTORY INTERPRETATION AND THE SHACKLES OF THE PAST

FROM SNAIL TO EGG: DUTY OF CARE, FAULT AND FOOD ALLERGIES

WHO PAYS FOR THE SUB-CONTRACTOR'S NEGLIGENCE? VICARIOUS LIABILITY AND LIABILITY FOR “EXTRA-HAZARDOUS ACTIVITIES” RE-EXAMINED

CAUSATION: IS IT FAIR?

BATTLE OF THE FORMS: RESTATING THE ORTHODOX

FALSE IMPRISONMENT OF PRISONERS: LAWFUL AUTHORITY, OMISSIONS AND DAMAGES

The Cambridge Law Journal

Refine listing

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

Volume 69 - November 2010

Case and Comment