Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:45:21.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Victims of Circumstances? A Defense of Virtue Ethics in Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Robert C. Solomon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Should the responsibilities of business managers be understood independently of the social circumstances and “market forces” that surround them, or (in accord with empiricism and the social sciences) are agents and their choices shaped by their circumstances, free only insofar as they act in accordance with antecedently established dispositions, their “character”? Virtue ethics, of which I consider myself a proponent, shares with empiricism this emphasis on character as well as an affinity with the social sciences. But recent criticisms of both empiricist and virtue ethical accounts of character deny even this apparent compromise between agency and environment. Here is an account of character that emphasizes dynamic interaction both in the formation and in the interplay between personal agency and responsibility on the one hand and social pressures and the environment on the other.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 43 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackburn, Simon. 1995. Essays in Quasi-Realism (New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Thomas J. Jr. 1997. “The Genetics of Personality” [chapter]. Blum, Kenneth (ed.), Noble, Ernest P., (ed.) et al. Handbook of Psychiatric Genetics. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, Inc., 273–296.Google Scholar
Broyles, William Jr. 1986. Brothers in Arms. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Carr, Alfred. Jan.–Feb. 1968. “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?” Harvard Business Review: 143–153.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., and Roberts, B. W. 1999. “Personality Continuity and Change Across the Life Course” in Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research 2nd ed. Pervin, L. A. and John, O. P. (eds.) New York: Guilford, 300–326.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’s Error. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., and Batson, C. D. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Didsosition Variables in Helping Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27.Google Scholar
Doris, John. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter A. 1984. Collective and Corporate Responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, Peter A. 1979. “The Corporation as a Moral Person.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16(3).Google Scholar
French, Peter A. “Responsibility and the Moral Role of Corporate Entities.” 1994. In Business as a Humanity (Ruffin Lectures II). Freeman, R. Edward (ed.). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Funder, David C. 2001. “Personality.” Annual Review of Psychology. 52: 197–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodpaster, Kenneth, and Matthews, John B. Jr. Jan.–Feb. 1982. “Can a Corporation Have a Conscience? Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald. “Everybody’s Doing It.” Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1): 75–94.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul. 1997. What Emotions Really Are. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1998–99. “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (99): 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1999–2000. “The Nonexistence of Character Traits.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (100): 223–226.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 2000. Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Edwin M., ed. 2001. “The Role of Character in Business Ethics.” in The Next Phase of Business Ethics: Integrating Psychology and Ethics. Dienhart, J.Moberg, D., and Duska, R. (eds.). Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heatherton, Todd F. and Weinberger, Joel Lee (eds.). 1994. “Can Personality Change? [edited book]. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 368.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1902. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 2nd ed. Sleby-Biggee, L. A. (ed.). Clarendon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., and Funder, D. C. 1988. “Profiting from Controversy: Lessons from the Person-Situation Debate.” American Psychologist (43): 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupperman, Joel. April 2001. “The Indispensability of Character.” Philosophy 76(2): 239–250.Google Scholar
Ladd, John. Oct. 1970. “Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations.” The Monist.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, Maria. 2000. “Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (3): 365–383.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1963. “Behavioral Study of Obedience.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley. 1983. Obedience to Authority. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1874. A System of Logic. 8th ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1954. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans., Kaufmann, . New York: Viking, 207.Google Scholar
Nisbett, and Ross, . 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Tim. 1973. If I Die in a Combat Zone Box Me Up and Ship Me Home. New York: Delacorte.Google Scholar
Palaima, Thomas. 2000. “Courage and Prowess Afoot in Homer and in Vietnam,” in Classical and Modern Literature 20(3):1–22.Google Scholar
Sachs, Oliver. 1998. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1956. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Barnes, H.New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Schumaker, E. F. 1973. Small is Beautiful. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1880. Theory of the Moral Sentiments. London: George Bell.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 1993. Ethics and Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, Robert C. 1999. A Better Way to Think about Business. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strudler, A., and Warren, D. 2001. “Authority, Heuristics, and the Structure of Excuses” in The Next Phase of Business Ethics. Dienhart, J., Moberg, D., and Duska, R. (eds.), 355–375.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G. 1982. Business Ethics. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Young, Robert. 1991. “The Implications of Determinism” in A Companion to Ethics. Singer, Peter (ed.). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar