Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:20:28.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Organizational Field Approach to Corporate Rationality: The Role of Stakeholder Activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Lenahan L. O’Connell ,
Carroll U. Stephens ,
Michael Betz ,
Jon M. Shepard  and
Jamie R. Hendry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper contends that rationality is more properly evaluated as a property of an organization’s relationships with its stakeholders than of the organization itself. We predicate our approach on the observation that stakeholders can hold goals quite distinct from those of owners and top managers, and these too can be rationally pursued. We build upon stakeholder theory and Weber’s classic distinction between wertrationalitat and zweckrationalitat, adding to them the “new institutionalist” concept of the organization field (1983, 1991). Stakeholders employ a variety of direct and indirect mechanisms to rationalize relations with the firm. We discuss four: internal subunits, legislated stakeholder participation, legislated access to information, and direct stakeholder activism. These developments are blurring the distinction between the environment and the organization by importing the values and goals of external stakeholders into the internal organization. They are also precipitating a more structured set of relationships among the actors who comprise the field. To the extent that the zweckrationalitat values of managers and owners as well as the wertrationalitat concerns of stakeholders are met, the firm is more rational.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 93 - 111
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C. 1985. “Crime in the Suites.” Time (June 10): 56–57.Google Scholar
Andersson, L. M., and Bateman, T. S.. 1998. “Championing Natural Environmental Issues in Business Organizations.” Working Paper, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1985 (orig. ca 328 BC). Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Irwin, T.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., and Roth, K.. 2000. “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” Academy of Management Journal 43: 717–36.Google Scholar
Baron, D. P. 2003. Business and Its Environment, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Baum, J. A. C., and Oliver, C.. 1991. “Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 187–218.Google Scholar
Berger, P., and Luckmann, T.. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Berman, S., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., and Jones, T. M.. 1999. “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 42: 488–506.Google Scholar
Berry, M. A., and Rondinelli, D. A.. 1998. “Proactive Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution.” Academy of Management Executive 12: 1–13.Google Scholar
Carroll, A., and Buchholtz, A. K.. 2002. Business and Society, 5th ed. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, G. F. 2000. “Executives’ Code of Business Conduct: Prospects for the Caux Principles.” In Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, O. F.. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press, 169–82.Google Scholar
Chubb, J. E., and Moe, T. M.. 1988. “Politics, Markets, and the Organization of Schools.” American Political Science Review 82: 1065–87.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. E. 1995. “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.” Academy of Management Review 20: 92–117.Google Scholar
Council on Economic Priorities. 1994. Shopping for a Better World. New York: Council on Economic Priorities.Google Scholar
Derber, C. 2000. Corporation Nation: How Corporations are Taking Over Our Lives and What We Can Do About It. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 46: 147–60.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W.. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. W. Powell and DiMaggio, P.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–40.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Edelman, L., Meyer, J., Scott, W. R., and Swidler, A.. 1988. “The Expansion of Due Process in Organizations.” In Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, ed. Zucker, L. G.. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 71–100.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., and Sutton, J.. 1998. “The Strength of a Weak State: The Employment Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Management Divisions.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 441–76.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., Sutton, J., Meyer, J., and Scott, W. R.. 1993. “Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 396–427.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E.. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20: 65–91.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. 1990. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 95: 1401–40.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 1531–76.Google Scholar
Egri, C. P., and Pinfield, L.. 1996. “Organization and Biosphere: Ecologies and Environments.” In Handbook of Organization Studies, ed. Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., and Nord, W.. London: Sage Publications, 459–83.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. 1984. Strategic Management. Boston: Pittman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., and Gilbert, D. R. Jr. 1988. Corporate Strategy and the Search for Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. 1999. “Stakeholder Influence Strategies.” Academy of Management Review 24: 191–205.Google Scholar
Gerth, H., and Mills, C. W.. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E. 2000. “The Caux Round Table Principles: Corporate Moral Reflection in a Global Business Environment.” In Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come, ed. Williams, O. F.. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press: 183–208.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. 1957. “Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles.” Administrative Science Quarterly 2: 281–306.Google Scholar
Greider, W. 1992. Who Will Tell the People. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hartman, L. P. 2002. Perspectives in Business Ethics, 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hedge, D. M., and Scicchitano, M.. 1994 “Regulating in Space and Time: The Case of Regulatory Federalism.” Journal of Politics 56: 134–53.Google Scholar
Heintz, H. T. 1988. “Advocacy Coalitions and the OCS Leasing Debate.” Policy Sciences 21: 213–38.Google Scholar
Holcomb, J. 1987. “Citizen Activism and Corporate Political Strategies: Evolution from 1970–1985. In Business and Society, ed. Sethi, S. and Falbe, C.. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 353–78.Google Scholar
Huffington, A. 2003. Pigs at the Trough: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption are Undermining America. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
“Inside Track.” 2002. Financial Times (September 11).Google Scholar
Jones, T. 1995. “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.” Academy of Management Review 20: 404–37.Google Scholar
Keeley, M. 1988. A Social-Contract Theory of Organizations. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, S., and Jermier, J.. 1978. “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 22 (December): 375–403.Google Scholar
Küng, H. 1997. “A Global Ethic in an Age of Globalization.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7: 17–32.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. T., and Morell, D.. 1995. “Leading Edge Environmental Management: Motivation, Opportunity, Resources, and Processes.” In Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, ed. Collins, D. and Starik, M.. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 99–126.Google Scholar
Lovins, A., and Lovins, H.. 1995. “Reinventing the Wheels.” The Atlantic Monthly 275 (January): 75–86.Google Scholar
Lynn, F., Kartez, J., and Connelly, C.. 1992. The Toxic Release Inventory. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Makower, J. 1994. Beyond the Bottom Line. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
McHutchinson, J. 2002. “Corporate Scandals.” CBS Online 26 (June): 1–4.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., and Rowan, B.. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63.Google Scholar
Meyer, J., and Rowan, B.. 1991. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P.. Chicago University of Chicago Press, 41–62.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. B., and Thomas, G.. 1994. “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations, ed. Scott, R. and Meyer, J.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J.. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22: 853–86.Google Scholar
Murphy, E. A., and Verschoor, C. C.. 2002a. “Best Corporate Citizens Have Better Financial Performance.” Strategic Finance 83: 20–21.Google Scholar
Murphy, E. A., and Verschoor, C. C.. 2002b. “The Financial Performance of Large U.S. Firms and Those with Global Prominence: How Do the Best Corporate Citizens Rate?” Business and Society Review 7: 371–80.Google Scholar
O’Connell, L., Betz, M., and Shepard, J.. 1990. “Social Control and Legitimacy: The Contributions of Accountability Mechanisms.” In Perspectives on Social Problems, ed. Holstein, J. and Miller, G.. 2: 261–77.Google Scholar
“100 Best Corporate Citizens.” 2002. Business Ethics 16: 8–12.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1998. “A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 92: 1–22.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. 1982. Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston: Pittman.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G.. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Posner, B. Z., and Schmidt, W.. 1992. “Values and the American Manager: An Update Updated.” California Management Review 34: 80–93.Google Scholar
Prakash, A., and Hart, J. A., eds. 1999. Globalization Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Primeaux, S. M. 2002. “Maximizing Ethics and Profits.” In Perspectives in Business Ethics, ed. Hartman, L. P.. Boston: McGraw-Hill: 242–47.Google Scholar
Roth, G., and Wittich, C.. 1968. “Introduction.” In Economy and Society. ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C.. New York: Bedminster Press, xxvii–cviii.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. J. 1997. “Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences.” Academy of Management Review 22: 867–910.Google Scholar
Satow, R. L. 1975. “Value-Rational Cultural and Professional Organizations, Weber’s Missing Type.” Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 526–31.Google Scholar
Schmidheiny, S. 1992. Changing Course. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scholz, J. T. 1991. “Cooperative Regulatory Enforcement and the Politics of Administrative Effectiveness.” American Political Science Review 85: 115–36.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1991. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1994. “Institutions and Organizations: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations, ed. Scott, W. R. and Meyer, J.. London: Sage: 55–80.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sethi, S. 1979. “A Conceptual Framework for Environment Analysis and Evaluation of Business Response Patterns.” Academy of Management Review 4: 63–74.Google Scholar
Sica, A. 1988. Weber, Irrationality and Social Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. 1957. Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., and House, R. J.. 1986. “Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 171–93.Google Scholar
Skelly, J. 1995. “The Rise of International Ethics: The Caux Round Table Principles for Business.” Business Ethics (March–April Supplement): 2–5.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J. and Swedberg, R.. 1994. The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solomon, D., and Sandberg, J.. 2002. “WorldCom’s False Profits Climb.” Wall Street Journal (November 6): A3.Google Scholar
Steckmest, S. 1982. Corporate Performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sutton, J., Dobbin, F., Meyer, J., and Scott, W. R.. 1994. “The Legalization of the Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 99: 944–71.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tolbert, P., and Zucker, L.. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 22–39.Google Scholar
Tolbert, P., and Zucker, L.. 1996. “The Institutionalization of Institutional Theory.” In Handbook of Organization Studies, ed. Clegg, S., Hardy, C., and Nord, W.. London: Sage, 175–90.Google Scholar
Tonnies, F. 1957 (orig. 1887). Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. trans. Loomis, C.. East Lansing, Mich.: The Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williams, O. F., ed. 2000. Global Codes of Conduct: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. 1998. The Corporate Report Card: Rating of 250 of America’s Corporations for the Socially Responsible Investor. New York: Penguin Putnam, Inc.Google Scholar