Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:33:27.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Loyalty in the Workplace have a Future?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

John C. Haughey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent recession only adds to the widespread fear that loyalties in the business world are rapidly becoming obsolete. This article spells out some of the history that has put loyalty in jeopardy and some of the characteristics of this affecton. It gives reasons why it will not disappear from the workplace.

The above analysis is then followed by a contrast between past and present motivations for work and a description of the workplace of the future according to three authors. Since all of these address loyalty issues directly or indirectly, there follows an analysis of the new loyalties that can be anticipated or are beginning to emerge in the workplace and the role of the manager in managing these. The article concludes by placing these future loyalties within a framework inspired by Josiah Royce.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Robert, Howard, Brave New World (New York: Viking Press, 1985), p. 95Google Scholar.

2 Howard, op. cit., p. 119.

3 Joseph, Badaracco, The Knowledge Link (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1990), p. 27Google Scholar.

4 Herbert, A. Simon, cited in Yoneji, Masuda, The Information Society (Tokyo: Institute for the Information Society, 1980), p. xvGoogle Scholar.

5 Howard, op. cit., p. 79.

6 Publication of The Conference Board entitled “Rethinking Employment Security;” monograph by Kathryn, Troy (1990)Google Scholar.

7 New York Times, Saturday, May 18, 1991, pp. 1ff.

8 Carol, K. Goman, The Loyalty Factor (Berkeley: KCS Publishing, 1990), pp. 10–11Google Scholar.

9 Josiah, Royce, A Philosophy of Loyalty (New York: Macmillan & Company, 1908), p. 30Google Scholar.

10 Robert, C. Subby, Lost in the Shuffle : The Co-Dependent Reality (Pompano Beach: Health Communications, Inc., 1987)Google Scholar; Anne, Wilson Schaef, Co-Dependence: Misunderstood and Mistreated (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1986)Google Scholar.

11 Gregory, Baum, The Priority of Labor (Ramsey: Paulist Press, 1982), chapter 2Google Scholar.

12 Michael Maccoby (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1985).

13 Quinn Mills, D., Rebirth of the Corporation (New York: Wiley, 1991)Google Scholar.

14 Mills, op. cit., p. 185.

15 Rosabeth, Moss Kanter, When Giants Learn to Dance (New York: Simaon & Schuster, 1989), p. 10Google Scholar.

16 Kanter, op. cit., pp. 52–53.

17 Kanter, op. cit., pp. 332–40.

18 Badaracco, op. cit. possim, chapter 6.

19 Badaracco, op. cit., p. 13.

20 Badaracco, op. cit., p. 14.

21 Lawrence, Kohlberg, The Philosophy of Moral Development (San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1981), chapter 3Google Scholar; cf. also James, Weber’s “Adapting Kohlberg to Enhance the Assessment of Manager’s Moral Reasoning,” in Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 1 (1991)Google Scholar.

22 Thomas, Hobbes, Leviathan, ed. Oakesliott, M. (Oxford: Blackwell, n.d.), chapter 6, page 132Google Scholar.

23 Josiah, Royce, The Problem with Christianity, Introduction and editor, John, E. Smith (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968), p. 319Google Scholar.

24 Frank, Oppenheim, “A Roycean Response to the Challenge of Individualism,” found in Donald, Gelpi (ed.), Beyond Individualism (N. D. U. Press, 1989), pp. 87–119Google Scholar.