Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:02:44.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy and Private Discretion in Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Wim Dubbink
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Some critics raise moral objections against corporate social responsibility on account of its supposedly undemocratic nature. They argue that it is hard to reconcile democracy with the private discretion that always accompanies the discharge of responsibilities that are not judicially enforceable. There are two ways of constructing this argument: the “perfect-market argument” and the ‘social-power argument.” This paper demonstrates that the perfect-market argument is untenable and that the social-power argument is sometimes valid. It also asserts that the proponents of the perfect-market argument are mistaken in their assumption that perfect markets are conducive to democracy. There are strong reasons to hold that perfect markets are undesirable from a democratic point of view. A proper conceptualization and differentiation of the relation between “the private and the public” can make this clear. The proponents of the social-power argument sometimes maintain that the democratic deficit can be compensated for by consulting the stakeholders affected. Against this, I will argue that the social power argument has nothing to offer affected parties. Still, it will be shown that modern theory on corporate social responsibility is not well accommodated to the democratic deficit as revealed by the social power argument.

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 37 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 2001. “Vissticks met Duurzaamheid.” NRC Handelsblad (October 27).Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. 1975. “Business Responsibility and Economic Behavior.” In Anshen, M., Managing the Socially Responsible Corporation. New York: MacMillan, 59–74.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J., and Batey Blackman, S. J.. 1991. Perfect Markets and Easy Virtue: Business Ethics and the Invisible Hand. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belliveau, M. “The Mantle of ‘Going Green.’” In Fish Stakes (http://icsf.net/jsp/fish-stakes/fish.jsp). Accessed November 25, 2002.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Berlin, I., Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118–72.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. 1999. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Braathen, J. N. 1999. “Label Gabble.” Sumandra 22 (April).Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. 1985. Ethics, Efficiency and the Market. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
van der Burg, W. 1991. Het democratisch perspectief. Een verkenning van de normatieve grondslagen van de democratie. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.Google Scholar
Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics. 2002. “Principles of Stakeholder Management.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 257–64.Google Scholar
Constance, D. H., and Bonanno, A.. 2000. “Regulating the Global Fisheries: The World Wildlife Fund, Unilever and the Marine Stewardship Council.” Agriculture and Human Values 17: 125–39.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1985. A Preface to Economic Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1986. Democracy, Liberty and Equality. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1980. Democracy and Education. The Middle Works, Volume 9: 1916, ed. Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1984. “The Public and its Problems.” In Dewey, J., Essays, Reviews, Miscellany and “The Public and its Problems.” The Later Works, Volume 2: 1925–1927, ed. Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 235–372.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1985. “Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us.” In Dewey, J., The Later Works, 1925–1953. Volume 14: 1939–1941, ed. Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 224–30.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, K. 2003. “Lang leve het pitrus! Onderzoeker Rob Bijlsma over de vele misverstanden in het natuurbeheer.” NRC Handelsblad (January 18).Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1994. “The Perils of Multinationals’ Largess.” Business Ethics Quarterly 4(3): 367–72.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. R.. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.” Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
Dunfee, T. W., and Donaldson, T.. 1999. “Social Contract Approaches to Business Ethics: Bridging the ‘Is-Ought’ Gap.” In A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Frederick, R. E. (Blackwell Companions to Philosophy). Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 39–55.Google Scholar
Dworkin, D. 1978/1979. “Liberalism.” In Public and Private Morality, ed. Hampshire, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–43.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. M. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Editorial Comment. 1996. “Going Green about the Gills.” Sumandra 15 (July): 1.Google Scholar
Editorial Comment. 1999. “A Fish by Any Other Name.” Sumandra 22 (April): 1.Google Scholar
Evan, W. M., and Freeman, R. E.. 1995. “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism.” In Business Ethics. Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality, third edition, ed. Hoffman, W. M. and Frederick, R. E.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 145–53.Google Scholar
Fisher, C., and Lovell, A.. 2003. Business Ethics and Values. Essex: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., and Phillips, R. A.. 2002 “Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3): 331–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine (13 September).Google Scholar
De George, R. T. 1982/1999. Business Ethics, fifth edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. E., and Matthews, J. B. Jr. 1982. “Can a Corporation have a Conscience?” Harvard Business Review 60 (January–February): 139–40.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M., and McPherson, M. S.. 1993. “Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy.” Journal of Economic Literature 31 (June): 671–731.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1948/1980. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press/Midway.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1960/1990. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Held, D. 1987. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. Jr. 1971. “Kant on Imperfect Duty and Supererogation.” Kant Studien 72: 55–76.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton, N.J.: University Press.Google Scholar
Homann, K. 1994. “Marktwirtschaft und Unternehmensethik.” In Markt und Moral. Die Diskussion um die Unternehmensethik, ed. Blasche, S., Köhler, W., and Rohs, P.. Bern: Haupt, 109–30.Google Scholar
Homann, K. 1997. “Sinn und Grenze der Ökonomischen Methode in der Wirtschaftsethik.” In Wirtschaftsethik und Moralökonomik. Normen, soziale Ordnung und der Beitrag der Ökonomik, ed. Aufderheide, D. and Dabrowski, M.. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 11–41.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1797/1996/2003. The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. and trans. Gregor, M., intro. Sullivan, R. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, J. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kurien, J. “A View from the Third World.” In Fish Stakes. (http://icsf.net/jsp/fish-stakes/fish.jsp). Accessed November 25, 2002.Google Scholar
Kurien, J. 2000. “Behind the Label.” New Internationalist 325 (July): 1–4.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World’s Political-Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1984. “The Accountability of Private Enterprise: Private—No. Enterprise—Yes.” In Social Accounting for Corporations: Private Enterprise versus the Public Interest, ed. Tinker, T.. New York: Markus Wieners Publishing, 13–36.Google Scholar
Lively, J. 1975. Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Luijk, H. 2002. “Integrity in the Private, the Public and the Corporate Domain.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
van Luijk, H., and Schilder, A.. 1997. Patronen van Verantwoordelijkheid. Ethiek en Corporate Governance. Schoonoven: Academic Service.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. 1973/1989. Democratic Theory. Essays in Retrieval. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. 1977. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: (Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, D., and Miller, A. G., eds. 1991. A Modern Guide to Economic Thought: An Introduction to Comparative Schools of Thought in Economics. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1848/1985. Principles of Political Economy. With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Books IV and V, ed. Winch, D.. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1859/1974. On Liberty, ed. Himmelfarb, G.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1861/1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Nauta, L.W. 2002. “Wereldburgerschap.” De Gids 415(9) (September): 696–707.Google Scholar
Neis, B. L. “Cut Adrift.” In Fish Stakes. (http://icsf.net/jsp/fish-stakes/fish.jsp). Accessed November 25, 2002.Google Scholar
O’Riordan, B. “Who’s being Seduced?” In Fish Stakes. (http://icsf.net/jsp/fish-stakes/fish.jsp). Accessed November 25, 2002.Google Scholar
Paine, L. S. 1997. (Cases in) Leadership, Ethics and Organizational Integrity. A Strategic Perspective. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. 1979/1985. The Problem of Political Obligation. A Critique of Liberal Theory. Oxford: J. Wiley and Sons/Polity Press.Google Scholar
Philips, R. A. 2002. “Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness.” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1): 51–66.Google Scholar
Philips, R. P., Freeman, R. E., and Wicks, A. C.. 2003. “What Stakeholder Theory is Not.” Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4): 479–502.Google Scholar
Post, J. E., Lawrence, A. T., and Weber, J.. 1999. Business and Society: Corporate Strategy, Public Policy and Ethics, ninth edition. Boston: Irwin, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Postema, G. J. 1994. “Public Faces—Private Places—Liberalism and the Enforcement of Morality.” In Morality, Harm and the Law, ed. Dworkin, G.. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 76–93.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1972/1986. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rödel, U., Frankenberg, G., and Dubiel, H.. 1989. Die demokratische Frage. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Salzman, J. 1993. “The Trade Implications of Ecolabelling.” Paper delivered to the OECD Workshop on Life Cycle Management and Trade. (OECD) Paris, June 1993.Google Scholar
le Sann, A. “Whose Labels? Whose Benefit?” In Fish Stakes. (http://icsf.net/jsp/fish-stakes/fish.jsp). Accessed November 25, 2002.Google Scholar
Sartoni, G. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited (two volumes). Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998/2000. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1944. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shams, R. 1995. “Ecolabelling and Environmental Policy Efforts in Developing Countries.” Intereconomics (May/June): 143–49.Google Scholar
Talmon, J. L. 1952. The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1979. “What’s Wrong With Negative Liberty?” In The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honour of Isiah Berlin, ed. Ryan, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–94.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar