Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:39:18.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building institutional capacity: from pervasive individualism to sustained coordination in small firm sectors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ana Maria Evans
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The small-business sector faces a persistent dilemma: small firms often lack the human skills and financial resources to modernize and compete. How, then, can small firms overcome collective action problems to forge sector-wide modernization? This paper examines the political dynamics and the process of institutional change that underpin successful industrial upgrading through a comparative, longitudinal analysis of two policy experiments aiming at the modernization of small firm sectors in Portugal. Relying on comparative-historical analysis and process tracing, this study shows that successful industrial upgrading relies on intense and sustained political action, led by strong and stable interest leadership, in the pursuit of well-defined developmental benchmarks, and relying on the implementation of political, organizational and financial strategy according to a specific logic and sequence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , August 2013 , pp. 163 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. 2001. “Corporate Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Asia: A Conceptual Framework.” Business and Politics 3 (2): 89–108.Google Scholar
Amaral, Luciano. 2002. “How a Country Catches Up: Explaining Economic Growth in Portugal in the Post-war Period (1950s to 1973)” PhD diss., European University Institute, Florence. Department of History and Civilization.Google Scholar
Bartkus, Viva Ona and Davis, James H., eds. 2009. Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching In. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Jurgen and Hopner, Martin. 2003. “The Disintegration of Organized Capitalism: German Corporate Governance in the 1990s,” West European Politics 26 (4): 179–198.Google Scholar
Boix, Charles and Posner, Daniel N. 1998. “Social Capital: Explaining its Origins and Effects on Governance.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 686–693.Google Scholar
Bowman, John R. 1989. Capitalist Collective Action: Competition, Cooperation and Conflict in the Coal Industry. Cambridge and NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Casper, Steven. 2000. “Institutional Adaptiveness, Technology Policy, and the Diffusion of New Business Models: The case of German Biotechnology.” Organization Studies 21 (5): 887–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure): S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 1993. Industrial Relations and European State Traditions. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel and berg, Erhard Fried. 1977. L'Acteur et le Système: Les Contraintes de l'Action Collective. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper. 2003. Creating Cooperation: How States Develop Human Capital in Europe. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail. eds. 2000. Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Djelic, Marie-Laure. 2004. “Social Networks and Country-to-Country Transfer: Dense and Weak Ties in the Diffusion of Knowledge.” Socio-Economic Review 2 (3, January): 341–370.Google Scholar
Duvanova, Dinissa. 2007. “Bureaucratic Corruption and Collective Action: Business Associations in the Post-Communist Transition.” Comparative Politics 37 (4, July): 441–461.Google Scholar
Duvanova, Dinissa. 2013. Building Business in Post-Communist Russia, Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa and Goodwin, Jeff. 1994. “Network Analysis, Culture and the Problem of Agency.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (6): 1411–1454.Google Scholar
Eurostat Pocketbooks – Theme Industry, Trade and Services. 2006. Key Figures on European Business – with a Special Feature Section on SMEs, Data 1995–2005. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 2004. “Development as Institutional Change: The Pitfalls of Monocropping and the Potentials of Deliberation.” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (4): 30–52.Google Scholar
Evans, Ana Maria. 2008. “Preemptive Modernization and the Politics of Sectoral Defense.” Comparative Politics 40 (3): 253–272.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. 2009. The Political Economy of Trust: Institutions, Interests and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy and Germany. NY and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, Dulce. 2002. “Sector Vinícola Contra a Organização Corporativa 1933–1937.” Ler História 42: 175–198.Google Scholar
Freire, Dulce. 2010. Produzir e Beber: A Questão do Vinho no Estado Novo. Lisboa: Âncora Editora.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin. 2001. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics & Society 29 (1): 5–41.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.Google Scholar
Haar, Jerry and Meyer-Stame, Jorg, eds. 2008. Small Firms, Global Markets: Competitive Challenges in the New Economy. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1999. “Social Capital in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (3, July): 417–461.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2010. “Politics as a Process Structured in Space and Time.” Paper presented at the Annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, September, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David. eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34.Google Scholar
Haydu, Jeffrey. 1999. “Two Logics of Class Formation? Collective Identities Among Proprietary Employers, 1880–1900.” Politics & Society 27 (4): 505–525.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers and Boyer, Robert. eds. 1997. Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Peer Hull and Whitley, Richard. eds. 1997. Governance at Work: The Social Regulation of Economic Relations in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lains, Pedro. 2003. Os Progressos do Atraso: Uma Nova História Económica de Portugal, 1842–1992. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
Lane, Christel. 1997. “The Social Regulation of Inter-firm Relations in Britain and Germany: Market Rules, Legal Norms and Technical Standards.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 21 (2): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard M. 1995. Remaking the Italian Economy. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lopes, José da Silva. 1996. A Economia Portuguesa desde 1960. Lisboa: Gradiva.Google Scholar
Love, James H. and Roper, Stephen. 2004. “The Organisation of Innovation: Collaboration, Cooperation and Multifunctional Groups in UK and German Manufacturing.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 28 (3): 379–395.Google Scholar
Martin, Cathie Jo. 2005. “Corporatism from the Firm Perspective: Employers and Social Policy in Denmark and Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 35: 127–148.Google Scholar
McDermott, Gerald. 2007. “The Politics of Institutional Renovation and Economic Upgrading: Recombining the Vines that Bind in Argentina.” Politics & Society 35 (1, March): 103–144.Google Scholar
Meyer-Stame, Jorg and Haar, Jerry. 2008. “Introduction: The Environment of Small Enterprise Competitiveness.” In Small Firms, Global Markets: Competitive Challenges in the New Economy, edited by Haar, Jerry and Meyer-Stame, Jorg. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus and Wiesenthal, Helmud. 1986. “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Political Form.” In Disorganized Capitalism, edited by Offe, Claus. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. “Social Capital: A Fad or a Fundamental Concept?” In Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, edited by Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Pyke, Frank and Sengenberger, Werner. eds. 1992. Industrial Districts and Local Economic Regeneration. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
Pyke, Frank, Becattini, G. and Sengenberger, Werner. eds. 1990. Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (August): 1–24.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Raffaella Y. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, William G. and Parker-Gwin, Rachel. 1999. “How Many Logics of Collective Action?” Theory and Society 28 (2, April): 203–237.Google Scholar
Royo, Sebastian. 2002. “A New Century of Corporatism? Corporatism in Spain and Portugal.” West European Politics 25 (3, July): 77–104.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles. 1993. “Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy.” Human Relations 46 (9, September): 1133–1170.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles. 1994. “Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1981. “Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America.” In Organizing Interests in Western Europe, edited by Berger, Suzanne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Streeck, Wolfgang. 1991. “The Organization of BusinessInterests: Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Discussion Paper 99/1. MPIfG.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross. 2004. Business and Politics and the State in Twentieth-Century Latin America. Cambridge and NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John. 1988. “Social Network Analysis.” Sociology 22 (1): 109–127.Google Scholar
Shadlen, Kenneth C. 2004. Democratization without Representation: The Politics of Small Industry in Mexico. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 1992. Social Institutions and Economic Performance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 1991. “Bringing Capital Back In, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden.” World Politics 43 (4): 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swenson, Peter. 2004. “Varieties of Capitalist Interests: Power, Institutions and the Regulatory Welfare State in the United States and Sweden.” Studies in American Political Development 18 (1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Traxler, Franz. 1993. “Business Associations and Labor Unions in Comparison: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings on Social Class, Collective Action and Associational Organizability.” The British Journal of Sociology 44 (4, December): 673–691.Google Scholar
Unger, Brigitte and Waarden, Frans van. 1999. “Interest Associations and Economic Growth.” Review of International Political Economy 6 (4, Winter): 425–467.Google Scholar
Useem, Michael. 1984. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Varanda, Marta P. 2005. La Réorganisation du Commerce d'un Centre-Ville: Résistance et Obstacles à l'Action Collective. Paris: l'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Villa, Agostino, ed. 2011. Managing Cooperation in Supply Network Structures and Small or Medium-sized Enterprises: Main Criteria and Tools for Managers. London: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Wellman, Barry and Berkowitz, S. D. eds. 2006. Social Structures: A Network Approach. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 2000. “The Institutional Structuring of Innovation Strategies: Business Systems, Firm Types, and Patterns of Technical Change in Different Market Economies.” Organization Studies 21 (5): 855–886.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 2007. Business Systems and Organizational Capabilities: The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar