Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:59:29.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What is modern about sovereign wealth funds? A reply to Pete Moore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Adam D. Dixon
Affiliation:
School of Geographical Science, University of Bristol
Ashby H.B. Monk
Affiliation:
Global Projects Center, Stanford University

Abstract

We welcome the opportunity to respond to Pete Moore's comments on our paper. In doing so, we address the central issue raised by Moore concerning our use of the term “modern” in our analysis of the origin, structure, and management of Gulf states’ sovereign wealth funds. As it turns out, our use of the term modern is complex and multifaceted; we hope to show that the issue raised by Pete Moore runs in a variety of directions and is not so easily resolved, as he suggests.

Type
Critical dialogue
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2013 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, Gordon L., Dixon, Adam D., and Monk, Ashby. 2013. Sovereign Wealth Funds: Legitimacy, Governance, and Global Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., Feldman, Maryann P., and Gertler, Meric S., eds. 2000. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Gordon L., and Wójcik, Dariusz. 2007. The Geography of Finance: Corporate Governance in the Global Marketplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Litterman, Bob. 2004. Modern Investment Management. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert C. and Bodie, Zvi. 2005. “The Design of Financial Systems: Towards a Synthesis of Function and Structure.” Journal of Investment Management 3 (1): 123.Google Scholar