Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:11:00.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mathara-Vrtti

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

A. Berriedale Keith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a paper contributed to the Bhandarkar Commemoration Volume in 1917, Professor S. K. Belvalkar announced the discovery of a new commentary on the Sāṃkhyakārikā by Māṭhara, and identified it with the lost Sanskrit original of the commentary on that work preserved in the Chinese translation of Paramārtha (c. a.d. 550). Commenting on this suggestion in 1918, I observed that derivation of the newly discovered commentary and of Paramārtha from the same source was an alternative possibility. Professor Belvalkar has now, in a paper which was written to form part of the collection presented to Professor Hillebrandt on his 70th birthday, and is pxiblished in the Annals of the Bhandarkar Institue, adduced reasons in support of his original suggestion.

Type
Papers Contributed
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , June 1924 , pp. 551 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1924

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 pp. 171–84.

2 Sāṁkhya System, p. 70, n. (ed. 2, p. 80, n. 2).Google Scholar

3 1924, pp. 133–08. I am indebted to the author for a copy of this paper.

4 p. 168.

5 p. 148.

1 As in the case of the extra K¯rikā interpolated after 61.

2 p. 155.

3 See Weber, , Ind. Stud., xvii, 9.Google Scholar

4 Bhandarkar Commemoration Volume, p. 174.Google Scholar

5 Annals, p. 154.Google Scholar

1 p. 96.

2 p. 168.

3 p. 147.

1 JRAS., 1905, p. 50Google Scholar: apparently withdrawn later (Garbe, , Sâṁkhya-Philosophie 2, p. 86).Google Scholar

2 Guṇaratna, , p. 108.Google Scholar

3 p. 151.

4 Bhojarāja, on Yoga Sūtra, iv, 22.Google Scholar

5 But he also cites the Kārikā without naming Īçvarakṛṣṇa (pp. 98, 102, 103, 109), and as at p. 103 he says Sāṃkhyair ittham ūce, it looks as if he were citing at second hand again. This is confirmed by his citation, slightly incorrectly, of Kārikā 62 (p. 107), as Kāpilāḥ, while just above an incorrect version of Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad, i, 2, 10, occurs. The citation from Patañjali (p. 105) is not in the Yoga Sūtra.

6 Ed. (Chaukhambā Sanskrit series), p. 119; Jacob, , JRAS., 1905, p. 356.Google Scholar

7 Karma-Mīmāṁsā, p. 59.Google Scholar