Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:50:05.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a classification of dynamical symmetries in classical mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Geoff Prince
Geoff Prince
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A one-parameter group on evolution space which permutes the classical trajectories of a Lagrangian system is called a dynamical symmetry. Following a review of the modern approach to the “symmetry-conservation law” duality an attempt is made to classify such invariance groups according to the induced transformation of the Cartan form. This attempt is fairly successful inasmuch as the important cases of Lie, Noether and Cartan symmetries can be distinguished. The theory is illustrated with a presentation of results for the classical Kepler problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 1983 , pp. 53 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1983

References

[1]Crampin, M., “Constants of the motion in Lagrangian mechanics”, Intenat. J. Theoret. Phys. 16 (1977), 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Estabrook, Frank B., “Differential geometry as tool for applied mathematicians”, Geometrical approaches to differential equations, 1–22 (Proc. Fourth Scheveningen Conf. Differential Equations, 1979. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 810. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Lutzky, M., “Symmetry groups and conserved quantities for the harmonic oscillator”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. (2) 11 (1978), 249–258.Google Scholar
[4]Marmo, G. and Saletan, E.J., “Ambiguities in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism: transformation properties”, Nuovo Cimento B 40 (1977), 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Prince, Geoffrey Eamonn, “Lie symmetries of differential equations and dynamical systems” (PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 1981). See also: Abstract, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 25 (1982), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Prince, Geoff, “A note on the higher-order Noether symmetries of Sarlet and Cantrijn” (Report DIAS–STP–82–28. Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies, Dublin, Eire, 1982).Google Scholar
[7]Sarlet, Willy and Cantrijn, Frans, “Generalizations of Noether's theorem in classical mechanics”, SIAM Rev. 23 (1981), 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Sarlet, Willy and Cantrijn, Frans, “Higher-order Noether symmetries and constants of the motion”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. (2) 14 (1981), 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar