Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:28:30.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerances and Commutators on lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Dietmar Schweigert
Dietmar Schweigert
Affiliation:
FB Mathematik, der Universität, D-6750 Kaiserslautern, Fed. Rep., Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The commutator has the following order theoretic properties: [α, β] ≦ α ∧ β, [α, β] = [β α],[α1 ∨ α2,β] = [α1, β] ∨ [α2, β] for congruences α, β ∈ Con A of an algebra A in a congruence modular variety generalising the original concept in group theory. A tolerance of a lattice L is a reflexive and symmetric sublattice of L2. We show that to every commutator [ , ] of Con A corresponds a ∧-subsemilattice of the lattice of tolerances of Con A. It can be shown that A in a congruence modular variety is nilpotent if |con A| > 2 and Con A is simple.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 213 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1988

References

[1]Bandelt, H.J., ‘Tolerance relations on lattice’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 23 (1981), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Chajda, I. and Zelinka, B., ‘Tolerances and convexity’, Czech. Math. J. 29 (104) (1979), 584–587.Google Scholar
[3]Freese, R. and McKenzie, R., ‘Commutator theory for congruence modular varieties’, (Preprint Honolulu, Berkeley 1986).Google Scholar
[4]Grätzer, and Wenzel, G.H., ‘Notes on tolerance relations of lattice I’, (Preprint).Google Scholar
[5]Hagemann, J. and Hermann, C., ‘A concrete ideal multiplication for algebraic systems and its relation to congruence distributivity’, Arch. Math. 32 (1979), 234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]McKenzie, R. and Hobby, D., ‘The structure of finite algebras’, (Prepnint, Berkeley 1986).Google Scholar
[7]Schweigert, D. and Szymańska, M., ‘On central relations of complete lattices’, (to appear), Czech. Math. J. 37 (1987).Google Scholar
[8]Schweigert, D., ‘Central relations on lattices’, J. Autral. Math. Soc. (A) 35 (1983), 369–372.Google Scholar