Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:49:00.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semi-simple classes in a variety satisfying an Andrunakievich Lemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Tim Anderson  and
B.J. Gardner
Tim Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary;
B.J. Gardner
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Department of Mathematics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is shown that in a variety of (not necessarily associative) algebras which satisfies a variant of Andrunakievich's Lemma, a class C containing no solvable algebras is the semi-simple class corresponding to some supernilpotent radical class if and only ifCis hereditary and is closed under extensions and sub-direct products. Semi-simple classes in general are not characterized by these properties. If the variety satisfies the further condition that some proper power of every ideal is an ideal, then analogous results hold for the semi-simple classes corresponding to radical classes containing no solvable algebras. In particular, for algebras over a field in the latter situation, all semi-simple classes are characterized by the three closure properties mentioned.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 187 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1978

References

[1]Amitsur, S.A., “A general theory of radicals. II. Radicals in rings and bicategories”, Amer. J. Math. 76 (1954), 100–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Anderson, Tim, “On the Levitzki radicl”, Canad. Math. Bull. 17 (1974), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Anderson, T., Divinsky, N., and Suliński, A., “Hereditary radicals in associative and alternative rings”, Canad. J. Math. 17 (1965), 594–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Anderson, Tim and Kleinfeld, Erwin, “A classification of 2-varieties”, Canad. J. Math. 28 (1976), 348–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Andrunakievič, V.A., “Radicals of associative rings. I”, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2) 52 (1966), 95–128.Google Scholar
[6]Andrunakievič, V.A. and Rjabuhin, Ju.M., “Torsions and Kuroš chains in algebras”, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 29 (1973), 17–47Google Scholar
[7]Fiedorowicz, Z., “The structure of autodistributive algebras”, J. Algebra 31 (1974), 427–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gardner, B.J., “Multiple radical theories”, submitted.Google Scholar
[9]Gardner, B.J., “Some degeneracy and pathology in non-associative radical theory”, submitted.Google Scholar
[10]Hentzel, I.R. and Slater, M., “On the Andrunakievich Lemma for alternative rings”, J. Algebra 27 (1973), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Leavitt, W.G. and Wiegandt, R., “Torsion theory for not necessarily associative rings”, Rocky Mountain J. Math, (to appear).Google Scholar
[12]van Leeuwen, L.C.A., Roos, C., and Wiegandt, R., “Characterizations of semisimple classes”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 23 (1977), 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Mal'cev, A.I., “Multiplication of classes of algebraic systems”, Siberian Math. J. 8 (1967), 254–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Miheev, I.M., “Prime right-alternative rings”, Algebra and Logic 14 (1976), 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Rich, Michael, “Some radical properties of s-rings”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 30 (1971), 40–42.Google Scholar
[16]POбyxиH, Ю.M. [Ju.M. Rjabuhin], ‘К Teopии pадикалoβ HeаccoциaTиβHbix кOлец,” [On the theory of radicals of non-associative rings], Mat. Issled. 3 (1968), vyp. 1 (7), 86–99.Google Scholar
[17]Sands, A.D., ”Strong upper radicals“, Quart. J. Math. Oxford (2) 27 (1976), 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Thedy, Armin, “Zum Wedderburnschen Zerlegungssatz”, Math. Z. 113 (1970), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Zwier, Paul J., “Prime ideals in a large class of nonassociative rings”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 158 (1971), 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar