Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:01:57.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nutrition of the Young Ayrshire Calf

4. Some Factors Affecting the Biological Value of Protein Determined by Nitrogen-Balance Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

K. L. Blaxter  and
W. A. Wood
K. L. Blaxter
Affiliation:
In Receipt of a Senior Award of the Agricultural Research Council Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
W. A. Wood
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1951 , pp. 55 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1951

References

REFERENCES

Allison, J. B. (1948). Ann. Rev. Biochem. 17, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J. B. & Anderson, J. A. (1945). J. Nutrit. 29, 413.Google Scholar
Allison, J. B., Anderson, J. A. & Seeley, R. D. (1946). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 47, 245.Google Scholar
Armsby, H. P. & Moulton, C. R. (1925). The Animal as a Converter of Matter and Energy. New York: Chemical Catalog. Co. Inc.Google Scholar
Barnes, R. H., Bates, M. J. & Maack, J. E. (1946). J. Nutrit. 32, 535.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1948). J. agric. Sci. 38, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Mitchell, H. H. (1948). J. Anim. Sci. 7, 351.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951 a). Brit. J. Nutrit. 5, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951 b). Brit. J. Nutrit. 5, 29.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951 c). (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Bricker, M. L. & Mitchell, H. H. (1947). J. Nutrit. 34, 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricker, M., Mitchell, H. H. & Kinsman, G. M. (1945). J. Nutrit. 30, 269.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. S. (1938). Quoted by Mitchell, H. H. (1938) in The Biological Value of the Proteins and a Criticism of the Methods of its Determination. Rome: Reale Accademia d'Italia.Google Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Mitchell, H. H. (1941). J. Nutrit. 22, 167.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M., Tsongas, A. G., Abbott, D. B. & Stare, F. J. (1946). J. Lab. clin. Med. 31, 261.Google Scholar
Melnick, D. & Cowgill, G. R. (1937). J. Nutrit. 13, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. I. & Morrison, F. B. (1939). J. agric. Res. 58, 149.Google Scholar
Miller, J. I. & Morrison, F. B. (1942). J. Anim. Sci. 1, 353.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1923–4). J. biol. Chem. 58, 873.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. & Beadles, J. R. (1926–7). J. biol. Chem. 71, 429.Google Scholar
Moulton, C. R., Trowbridge, P. F. & Haigh, L. D. (1923). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 61.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1935). J. biol. Chem. 109, 249.Google Scholar
Soxhlet, F. (1878). Ber. VersSta., Wien, no. 1.Google Scholar
Swanson, E. W. & Herman, H. A. (1943). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 372.Google Scholar