Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:59:58.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methane-suppressing effect of myristic acid in sheep as affected by dietary calcium and forage proportion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Andrea Machmüller ,
Carla R. Soliva  and
Michael Kreuzer
Andrea Machmüller*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, ETH Zentrum/LFW, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Carla R. Soliva
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, ETH Zentrum/LFW, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Michael Kreuzer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Animal Nutrition, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, ETH Zentrum/LFW, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Andrea Machmüller, fax +41 1 632 1128, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The efficiency of myristic acid (14:0) as a feed additive to suppress CH4 emissions of ruminants was evaluated under different dietary conditions. Six sheep were subjected to a 6 × 6 Latin square arrangement. A supplement of non-esterified 14: 0 (50 g/kg DM) was added to two basal diets differing in their forage:concentrate values (1:1/5 and 1: 0/5), which were adjusted to dietary Ca contents of 4/2 and 9/0 g/ kg DM, respectively. Comparisons were made with the unsupplemented basal diets (4/2 g Ca/kg DM). The 14:0 supplementation decreased (P < 0/001) total tract CH4 release depending on basal diet type (interaction, P < 0/001) and dietary Ca level (P < 0/05, post hoc test). In the concentrate-based diet, 14:0 suppressed CH4 emission by 58 and 47% with 4/2 and 9/0 g Ca/kg DM, respectively. The 14:0 effect was lower (22%) in the forage-based diet and became insignificant with additional Ca. Myristic acid inhibited (P < 0/05) rumen archaea without significantly altering proportions of individual methanogen orders. Ciliate protozoa concentration was decreased (P < 0/05, post hoc test) by 14:0 only in combination with 9/0 g Ca/kg DM. Rumen fluid NH3 concentration and acetate:pro-pionate were decreased (P < 0/05) and water consumption was lower (P < 0/01) with 14:0. The use of 14:0 had no clear effects on total tract organic matter and fibre digestion; this further illustrates that the suppressed methanogenesis resulted from direct effects against methanogens. The present study demonstrated that 14:0 is a potent CH4 inhibitor but, to be effective in CH4 mitigation feeding strategies, interactions with other diet ingredients have to be considered.

Keywords

MethaneMyristic acidForageCalcium
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 529 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2003

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980) The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL & Clapperton, JL (1965) Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br J Nutr 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, KL & Czerkawski, J (1966) Modifications of the methane production of the sheep by supplementation of its diet. J Sci Food Agric 17, 417–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, DR, Whitman, WB & Rovière, P (1993) Diversity and taxonomy of methanogens. In Methanogenesis: Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry & Genetics, pp. 35–80 [Ferry, JG, editor]. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E (1965) Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 441–443 [Blaxter, KL, editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, JW (1969) Methane production in ruminants and its significance. In World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol.11, pp. 240–282 [Bourne, GH, editor]. Basel, Switzerland: S Karger.Google Scholar
Dohme, F, Machmüller, A, Wasserfallen, A & Kreuzer, M (2001 a) Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett Appl Microbiol 32, 47–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohme, F, Sutter, F, Machmüller, A & Kreuzer, M (2001 b) Methane formation and energy metabolism of lactating cows receiving individual medium-chain fatty acids. In Energy Metabolism in Animals. Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Energy Metabolism in Animals, 2000, pp. 369–372 [Chwalibog, A and Jabobsen, K, editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Dong, Y, Bae, HD, McAllister, TA, Mathison, GW & Cheng, KJ (1997) Lipid-induced depression of methane production and digestibility in the artificial rumen system (RUSITEC). Can J Anim Sci 77, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El, Hag GA & Miller, TB (1972) Evaluation of whisky distillery by-products VI. The reduction in digestibility of malt distiller's grains by fatty acids and the interaction with calcium and other reversal agents. J Sci Food Agric 23, 247–258.Google Scholar
Galbraith, H & Miller, TB (1973) Effect of metal cations and pH on the antibacterial activity and uptake of long chain fatty acids. J Appl Bacteriol 36, 635–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galbraith, H, Miller, TB, Paton, AM & Thompson, JK (1971) Antibacterial activity of long chain fatty acids and the reversal with calcium, magnesium, ergocalciferol and cholesterol. J Appl Bacteriol 34, 803–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harfoot, CG, Crouchman, ML, Noble, RC & Moore, JH (1974) Competition between food particles and rumen bacteria in the uptake of long chain fatty acids and triglycerides. J Appl Bacteriol 37, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, C (1973) The effects of fatty acids on pure cultures of rumen bacteria. J Agric Sci 81, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinsberg, K (1953) Untersuchung der Organe, Körperflüssigkeiten und Ausscheidungen. 2. Harn. (Investigation of the organs, body fluids and excreta 2. Urine). In Handbuch der Physiologisch- und Pathologisch-chemischen Analyse, 10th ed., Vol.5, pp. 181–300 [Lang, K and Lehnnartz, E, editors]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hungate, RE (1966) The Rumen and its Microbes. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Immig, I (1996) The rumen and hindgut as source of ruminant methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42, 57–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, TC & Palmquist, DL (1982) Effect of added fat and calcium on in vitro formation of insoluble fatty acid soaps and cell wall digestibility. J Anim Sci 55, 957–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DE, Johnson, KA, Ward, GM & Branine, ME (2000) Ruminants and other animals. In Atmospheric Methane: Its Role in the Global Environment, pp. 112–133 [Khalil, MAK, editor]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabara, JJ (1978) Fatty acids and derivatives as antimicrobial agents. A review. In The Pharmacological Effect of Lipids, pp. 1–14 [Kabara, JJ, editor]. Champaign, IL: The American Oil Chemists' Society.Google Scholar
Keyser, RB, Noller, CH, Wheeler, LJ & Schaefer, DM (1985) Characterization of limestones and their effects in vitro and in vivo in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 68, 1376–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, MAK (2000) Atmospheric methane: an introduction. In Atmospheric Methane: Its Role in the Global Environment, pp. 1–8 [Khalil, MAK, editor]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C, Raskin, L & Stahl, DA (1997) Microbial community structure in gastrointestinal tracts of domestic animals: comparative analyses using rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 22, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machmüller, A, Dohme, F, Soliva, CR, Wanner, M & Kreuzer, M (2001) Diet composition affects the level of ruminal methane suppression by medium-chain fatty acids. Aust J Agric Res 52, 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machmüller, A & Kreuzer, M (1999) Methane suppression by coconut oil and associated effects on nutrient and energy balance in sheep. Can J Anim Sci 79, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machmüller, A, Soliva, CR & Kreuzer, M (2002) In vitro ruminal methane suppression by lauric acid as influenced by dietary calcium. Can J Anim Sci 82, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, M, Kobayashi, T, Takenaka, A & Itabashi, H (1991) Defaunation effects of medium-chain fatty acids and their derivatives on goat rumen protozoa. J Gen Appl Microbiol 37, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, PW & Tyrrell, HF (1980) Methane production in dairy cows. In Energy Metabolism. Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Energy Metabolism, 1979, pp. 59–62 [Mount, LE, editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Moss, AR, Jouany, JP & Newbold, J (2000) Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Annal Zootech 49, 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, K & Bassler, R (1997) Methodenbuch. Band III. Die Chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln, 4th ed. Darmstadt, Germany: VDLUFA-Verlag.Google Scholar
Okine, EK, Mathison, GW & Hardin, RT (1989) Effects of changes in frequency of reticular contractions on fluid and particulate passage rates in cattle. J Anim Sci 67, 3388–3396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmquist, DL, Jenkins, TC & Joyner, AE Jr (1986) Effect of dietary fat and calcium source on insoluble soap formation in the rumen. J Dairy Sci 69, 1020–1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, L, Stromley, JM, Rittmann, BE & Stahl, DA (1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 60, 1232–1240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, JA & Davis, CL (1982) Rumen volatile fatty acid production and nutrient utilization in steers fed a diet supplemented with sodium bicarbonate and monensin. J Dairy Sci 65, 944–952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandaa, RA, Enger, Ø & Torsvik, V (1999) Abundance and diversity of Archaea in heavy-metal-contaminated soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 3293–3297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stahl, DA, Amann, RI, Poulsen, LK, Raskin, L & Capman, WC (1995) Use of fluorescent probes for determinative microscopy of methanogenic Archaea. In Archaea: Methanogens: A Laboratory Manual, pp. 111–121 [Sowers, KR and Schreier, HJ, editors]. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Sutton, JD, Knight, R, McAllan, AB & Smith, RH (1983) Digestion and synthesis in the rumen of sheep given diets supplemented with free and protected oils. Br J Nutr 49, 419–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swiss Federal, Research Station of Animal Production (1999) Fütterungsempfehlungen und Nährwerttabellen für Wiederkäuer, 4th ed. Zollikofen, Switzerland: Landwirtschaftliche Lehrmittel-zentrale.Google Scholar
Van Kessel, JAS & Russell, JB (1996) The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 20, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nevel, CJ & Demeyer, DI (1996) Control of rumen methanogenesis. Environ Monit Assess 42, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB & Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, ACI & Stacy, BD (1968) The fate of water in the rumen 2. Water balances throughout the feeding cycle in sheep. Br J Nutr 22, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, FG, Eadie, JM, Bruce, LA & Shand, WJ (1984) Methane formation in faunated and ciliate-free cattle and its relationship with rumen volatile fatty acid productions. Br J Nutr 52, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, AG & Coleman, GS (1997) The rumen protozoa. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem, pp. 73–139 [Hobson, PN and Stewart, CS, editors]. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuebbles, DJ & Hayhoe, K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Sci Rev 57, 117–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, JY, Shimojo, M & Goto, I (1993) The effects of feeding level and roughage/concentrate ratio on the measurement of protein degradability of two tropical forages in the rumen of goats, using the nylon bag technique. Anim Feed Sci Technol 41, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar