Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:58:23.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of pregnancy and lactation on the activities of trypsin and α-chymotrypsin in the rat pancreas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

B. A. Rolls ,
M. J. Henschel  and
Maureen F. Palmer
B. A. Rolls
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
M. J. Henschel
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Maureen F. Palmer
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The food intake, pancreas weight and trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4) and α-chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1) activities in the pancreas were measured in rats during pregnancy and lactation and after the young were weaned.

2. All the quantities measured increased significantly during lactation and had returned to their original values by 4 weeks after weaning. Food intake and pancreas weight were highest after the second week of lactation. Total trypsin and α-chymotrypsin activity, and the activity per g tissue, fell during pregnancy and rose during lactation, reaching a maximum I week after weaning.

3. From these and other results it is suggested that the hypertrophy and hypersecretion of pregnancy and lactation are initiated by changes in insulin secretion and mediated by the trophic effects of gut hormones, and that differences in the nature and timing of the response may be controlled by nutrient availability.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 573 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Barrowman, J. A. & Mayston, P. D. (1973). J. Physiol., Lond. 229, 41P.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. M., Innes, I. R. & Kosterlitz, H. W. (1953). J. Endocr. 9, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costrini, N. V. & Kalkoff, R. K. (1971). J. clin. Invest. 50, 992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craft, I. L. (1970). Clin. sci. 38, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crean, G. P. & Rumsey, R. D. E. (1971). J. Physiol., Lond. 215, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, A. W. & Williams, V. J. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 33, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, E. & Dowling, R. H. (1976). Clin. Sci. mol. Med. 51, 427.Google Scholar
Erlanger, B. F., Kokowsky, N. & Cohen, W. (1961). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 95, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, B. F. (1972). Wld Rev. Nutr. Diet. 14, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, B. F. (1977). Rep. Rowett Inst. 33, 97.Google Scholar
Fell, B. F., Campbell, R. M., Mackie, W. B. & Weekes, T. E. C. (1972). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fell, B. F., Smith, K. A. & Campbell, R. M. (1963). J. Path. Bact. 85, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, I. C. & Taylor, K. W. (1972). J. Endocr. 54, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, I. C. & Taylor, K. W. (1974). J. Endocr. 62, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, D., Georg, R. H., Leitner, J. W. & Beck, P. (1972). Endocrinology 91, 977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henschel, M. J. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. C., Pearce, W. A. & Parrott, D. M. V. (1958). J. Endocr. 17, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, M. (1939). J. gen. Physiol. 22, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, R. E., Mayne, R. & Barry, J. M. (1968). Biochim. biophys. Acta 157, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaisse, W. J., Malaisse-Lagae, F., Picard, C. & Flament-Durand, J. (1969). Endocrinology, 84, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayston, P. D. & Barrowman, J. A. (1971). Q. Jl exp. Physiol. 56, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, S. J. (1973). Studies on the cell kinetics of the intestinal epithelium of sheep. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Rolls, B. A. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 33, I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudek, C. D., Finowski, M. & Knopp, R. H. (1975). J. clin. Invest. 55, 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenk, E. & Joachim, E. (1961). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 108, 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scow, R. O., Chernick, S. S. & Brinley, M. S. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. W. (1975). Biochim. biophys. Acta 411, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, J. T. (1974). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 33, 88.Google Scholar
Souders, H. (1955). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 14, 142.Google Scholar
Unger, R. H., Ketterner, H., Duprej, J. & Eisentrant, A. M. (1967). J. clin. Invest. 46, 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekes, T. E. C. (1972). Observations on the metabolic role of the rumen epithelium. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar