No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Lagrange on Orphism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2024
Extract
On reading the quiet, always scholarly and often humorous pages of a veteran’s book on a difficult subject, it is hard to know whether it is the book or the writer that holds us most. The bibliography given in Pére Lagrange’s study of Orphism suggests the obvious remark that the lyre of the Thracian god—if he be a god and if he be a Thracian—still renders spell-bound but not dumb-founded a throng of living beings.
Needless to say this latest writer on the Thracian god has not given his time and scholarship to one of those pagan myths that were hardly more than premonitory symptoms of the present world-wide outbreak of fiction. Pére Lagrange has been by nature and choice so authentic a defender of the Ark that even in his lightest words he has been at least brushing off annoying and persistent flies.
In this remote matter of Orpheus and Orphism the assailants of the Ark are not a company of irregulars. Loisy, Reinach, Boulanger and others are worthy of Pére Lagrange’s best defence, and le beau sabreur, even in his old age, does not disappoint us. If we were allowed to summarize Pére Lagrange’s summary of his own view we would say: In Thrace, in Greece, in Crete, the (orphic) religion of Zagreus was mingled with the Egyptian cult of Osiris. About the seventh century before Christ this fusion of Zagreus and Osiris was further mixed with the cult of Dionysos which had come from Phrygia and Lydia to Greece through Thrace. If Dionysos (or Bacchus) was an element of joy and even intoxication, the Zagreus-Osiris blend was an element of fear and even of pessimism. Indeed the original Orphism, as distinct from its Dionysian element, was not the wine but the vinegar of life.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1937 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
Footnotes
L'Oipkisme par le P. M.-J. Lagrange, O.P. (Paris. Gabalda & Cie.)
References
2 John Henry Newman by Wilfrid Ward, London, 1912. Vol. 1, pp. 166, 167.
3 An incident in the literary life of Père Lagrange may here be recalled. When the present writer asked him to write a word of Introduction in the writer's New Testament Witness to St. Peter, the request was answered by an Introduction which received special praise from the Roman censors of the book. But a prominent Catholic paper condemned the book because Père Lagrange, grateful for the biblical work of Anglicans, had courteously written “La noble Eglise Episcopalienne en Angleterre”. The condemnation was not without its humour, as the reviewer was, we believe, a convert from Nonconformity!