Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:39:45.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Teachers, Children with Reading Difficulties, and Remedial Reading Assistance in Primary Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Amanda L. Richdale*
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
John E. Reece
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Angela Lawson
Affiliation:
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
*
Department of Psychology and Intellectual Disability Studies, RMIT, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
Get access

Abstract

While there is a body of research addressing the causes of reading difficulty and the identification and remediation of children with a reading difficulty, little is reported regarding the type and adequacy of assistance that these children actually receive in school. This study addresses the latter two issues. A random sample of 110 Year 3 teachers from State primary schools answered questions concerning school resources for assisting children with a reading difficulty, main method of teaching reading, their beliefs concerning reading difficulty, and their own level of general teaching experience and experience and training in managing reading difficulty. These teachers then provided information concerning the ability level, behavioural problems, perceived cause of reading difficulty, assessment, and adequacy of assistance for 303 Year 3 children whom they identified as having a reading difficulty. Results indicated that 42.7% of teachers predominantly used a whole language approach to teaching reading and that, by teacher definition, only 36.6% of children were receiving adequate assistance for their reading difficulty. Regression analysis showed that the factors most strongly associated with adequate assistance were a less severe level of reading difficulty, a higher level of support available within the school, and more children with reading difficulty in the class. The implications of these findings and other characteristics of the children with reading difficulties are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Blachman, B.A. (1991). Early intervention for children's reading problems: Clinical applications of the research in phonological awareness. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 6075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, D.A., & Kiger, G. (1994). Language attitudes of teachers scale (LATS). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 227231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucci, J.M., & Childs, B. (1981). Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In Anasara, A., Geschwind, N., Galaburda, A., Albert, M., & Gartrell, N. (Eds.), Sex differences in dyslexia (pp. 110). Maryland: Orton Dyslexia Society.Google Scholar
Flynn, J.M., & Rahbar, M.H. (1994). Prevalence of reading failure in boys compared with girls. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 6671.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, C.M., & McClelland, G.H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lawson, A., & Richdale, A.L. (1996). A scale for measuring teachers' beliefs about reading and children with reading disabilities. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, D.J. (1977). Teachers' perceptions and “problem” pupils. Educational Review, 29, 188203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I.Y., & Liberman, A.M. (1990). Whole language versus code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, R., Share, D., Moffitt, T.E., Williams, S., & Silva, P. (1988). Reading disability, behaviour problems and juvenile delinquency. In Saklofske, D.H. & Eysenck, S.B.G. (Eds.), individual differences in children and adolescents. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
McRae, D. (1994). Into the bone: The impact of cuts to Victorian government school education 1993–1994. Upublished manuscript.Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council. (1990). Learning difficulties in children and adolescents. Canberra: Department of Health and Community Services/Australian Government Publishing Services.Google Scholar
Pickering, D., Szaday, C., & Duerdoth, P. (1988). One in eleven: Special educational needs of Catholic schools in Victoria. Burwood, VIC: Victoria College Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M.R. (1989). Reading disability: “Normative” or “pathological”? Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 135158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, M. (1994). Reading disability in Australian children. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 26, 37.Google Scholar
Prior, M.R. (1995, 09). The relationship between reading problems and behavioural problems: Temporal and causal connections. Poster session presented at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Prior, M., Sanson, A., Smart, D., & Oberklaid, F. (1995). Reading disability in an Australian community sample. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 3237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richdale, A.L. (1993). Education of children with specific learning difficulties: A survey of Melbourne primary schools. Melbourne: SPELD.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salvesen, K.A., & Undheim, J.O. (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 6066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sattler, J. (1992). The assessment of children(3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome Sattler.Google Scholar
Selkowitz, M. (1993). Dyslexia and other learning difficulties: The facts. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Escobar, M.D. (1990). Prevalence of reading disability in boys and girls: Results of the Connecticut longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264, 9981002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, L.S. (1993). The development of reading. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 24, 6397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva, P.A., McGee, R., & Williams, S. (1985). Some characteristics of 9-year-old boys with general reading backwardness or specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26, 407421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smart, D., Sanson, A., & Prior, M. (in press). Connections between reading disability and behavior problems: Testing temporal and causal hypotheses. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.Google Scholar
Sowden, P.T., & Stevenson, J. (1994). Beginning reading strategies in children experiencing contrasting teaching methods. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 109123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1989). Has the learning disabilities field lost its intelligence? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 487491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K.E. (1993a). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 24, 133180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K.E. (1993b). A model for studies of reading disability. Developmental Review, 13, 225245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Freeman, D.J. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills, and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnik, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Thomson, M. (1995). Evaluating teaching programs for children with specific learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 27, 2027.Google Scholar
Tobin, D., & Pumfrey, P.D. (1977). Some long-term effects of the remedial teaching of reading. Educational Review, 29, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, G. (1995, 10). Keys to life. The Australian College of Education Victorian Chapter Newsletter, 14.Google Scholar
Vogel, S.A. (1990). Gender differences in intelligence, language, visual-motor abilities and academic achievement in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Difficulties, 23, 4452.Google ScholarPubMed
Westwood, P. (1995). Teachers' beliefs and expectations concerning students with learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 27, 1921.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.S., Schendel, J.M., & Ulman, J.E. (1992). Curriculum-based measures, teachers' ratings, and group achievement scores: Alternative screening measures. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 5976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, G.C., & Yates, S.M. (1990). Teacher effectiveness research: Towards describing user-friendly classroom instruction. Educational Psychology, 10, 225237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yochum, N., & Miller, S.D. (1993). Parents', teacher's and children's views of reading problems. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 5971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar