Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  4. Volume 4
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all volumes

Volume 4 - December 1981

Contents

Page 2 of 18

Open Peer Commentary

  • Warren's physical correlate theory: Correlation does not imply causation

  • Donald D. Dorfman
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, pp. 192-193

  • Warren's major contention is that judgments of subjective magnitude are not possible, and therefore subjects base such judgments upon physical correlates of the dimension in question. It would appear that Warren's theory will almost surely fail as a comprehensive model, even though it does provide a heuristic account of judgments of loudness and brightness. In order for the theory to succeed, Warren must specify a physical correlate for judgments of every subjective attribute that has yielded orderly data with Stevens's scaling procedures.

  • Cerebral predominance in the monkey?

  • G. Ettlinger
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2010, pp. 25-26

  • The issues raised by Dr. Denenberg are complex, not least because the apparent communalities of hemispheric specialization among birds, rodents, monkeys, and human beings are also associated with negative instances (e.g., for parrots, Nottebohm 1976; for Macaco, other than fuscata, Petersen et al. 1978). To extend the available evidence I would like to refer to the preliminary findings of Garcha et al. (1980) on the monkey.

Page 2 of 18