No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Where is the baby in core knowledge?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2024
Abstract
What we know about what babies know – as represented by the core knowledge proposal – is perhaps missing a place for the baby itself. By studying the baby as an actor rather than an observer, we can better understand the origins of human intelligence as an interface between perception and action, and how humans think and learn about themselves in a complex world.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asaba, M., & Gweon, H. (2022). Young children infer and manage what others think about them. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(32), e2105642119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105642119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, A. E., & Rochat, P. (2006). Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to social contingency in mother–infant and stranger–infant interaction. Infancy, 9(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327078in0903_3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuey, A., Jara-Ettinger, J., & Gweon, H. (2023). Violation of epistemic expectations: Children monitor what others know and recognize unexpected sources of knowledge. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2751–2758). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Danjo, T., Toyoizumi, T., & Fujisawa, S. (2018). Spatial representations of self and other in the hippocampus. Science, 359(6372), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denison, S., & Xu, F. (2010). Twelve- to 14-month-old infants can predict single-event probability with large set sizes: Twelve- to 14-month-olds can predict single-event probability. Developmental Science, 13(5), 798–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00943.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feigenson, L., & Carey, S. (2003). Tracking individuals via object-files: Evidence from infants’ manual search. Developmental Science, 6(5), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G. (2002). The development of understanding self and agency. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 26–46). Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In Rochat, P. (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (Vol. 60, pp. 101–136). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goupil, L., Romand-Monnier, M., & Kouider, S. (2016). Infants ask for help when they know they don't know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(13), 3492–3496. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515129113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gweon, H., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). 16-month-olds rationally infer causes of failed actions. Science, 332(6037), 1524. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gweon, H., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Schulz, L. E. (2010). Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(20), 9066–9071. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003095107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermer, L., & Spelke, E. S. (1994). A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature, 370(6484), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/370057a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyman, G. D., Compton, A. M., Amemiya, J., Ahn, S., & Shao, S. (2021). Children's reputation management: Learning to identify what is socially valued and acting upon it. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211009516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. (1890). The consciousness of self. In James, W. (Ed.), The principles of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 291–401). Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? Features that elicit gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90581-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Brooks, N. B., & Spelke, E. S. (2019). Origins of the concepts cause, cost, and goal in prereaching infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2, 201904410–201904416. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904410116Google Scholar
Moser, E. I., Roudi, Y., Witter, M. P., Kentros, C., Bonhoeffer, T., & Moser, M.-B. (2014). Grid cells and cortical representation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(7), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3766CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadel, J., Carchon, I., Kervella, C., Marcelli, D., & Reserbat-Plantey, D. (1999). Expectancies for social contingency in 2-month-olds. Developmental Science, 2(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omer, D. B., Maimon, S. R., Las, L., & Ulanovsky, N. (2018). Social place-cells in the bat hippocampus. Science, 359(6372), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochat, P., & Striano, T. (2000). Perceived self in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 23(3–4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(01)00055-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovee, C. K., & Rovee, D. T. (1969). Conjugate reinforcement of infant exploratory behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(69)90025-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skerry, A. E., Carey, S. E., & Spelke, E. S. (2013). First-person action experience reveals sensitivity to action efficiency in prereaching infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(46), 18728–18733. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312322110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants’ perception of others’ actions. Cognition, 96(1), B1–B11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What babies know: Core knowledge and composition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, A. E., & Feigenson, L. (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science, 348(6230), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa3799CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streri, A., & Spelke, E. S. (1988). Haptic perception of objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(88)90022-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, A. J., Saxe, R., & Spelke, E. S. (2022). Infants infer potential social partners by observing the interactions of their parent with unknown others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(32), e2121390119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121390119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodward, A. (1998). Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach. Cognition, 69(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00058-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, P., Dweck, C., & Gweon, H. (2023). Young children's curiosity about what others think about the self. In M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 835–842). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Target article
Précis of What Babies Know
Related commentaries (25)
Concepts, core knowledge, and the rationalism–empiricism debate
Core knowledge and its role in explaining uniquely human cognition: Some questions
Core knowledge as a neuro-ethologist views it
Core knowledge, visual illusions, and the discovery of the self
Developmental origin of a language–cognition interface in infants: Gateway to advancing core knowledge?
Divisive language
Early pragmatic expectations in human infancy
Evidence for core social goal understanding (and, perhaps, core morality) in preverbal infants
How do babies come to know what babies know?
How important is it to learn language rather than create it?
Investigating infant knowledge with representational similarity analysis
Is core knowledge a natural subdivision of infant cognition?
Is there only one innate modular system for spatial navigation?
Learning in the social being system
More than language is needed to represent and combine different core knowledge components
Not all core knowledge systems are created equal, and they are subject to revision in both children and adults
Perceptual (roots of) core knowledge
Questioning the nature and origins of the “social agent” concept
Substances as a core domain
The brain origins of early social cognition
The key to understanding core knowledge resides in the fetus
The role of language in transcending core knowledge
What we don't know about what babies know: Reconsidering psychophysics, exploration, and infant behavior
Where is the baby in core knowledge?
Wired for society? From ego-logy to eco-logy
Author response
Response to commentaries on What Babies Know