Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Wedel, Andrew
Jackson, Scott
and
Kaplan, Abby
2013.
Functional Load and the Lexicon: Evidence that Syntactic Category and Frequency Relationships in Minimal Lemma Pairs Predict the Loss of Phoneme contrasts in Language Change.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
395.
Fine, Alex B.
Jaeger, T. Florian
Farmer, Thomas A.
Qian, Ting
and
Paterson, Kevin
2013.
Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.
PLoS ONE,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 10,
p.
e77661.
Seyfarth, Scott
2014.
Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation.
Cognition,
Vol. 133,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Kurumada, Chigusa
and
Jaeger, T. Florian
2015.
Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 83,
Issue. ,
p.
152.
Brown, Meredith
and
Kuperberg, Gina R.
2015.
A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Language Processing: Linking Language Perception, Interpretation, and Production Abnormalities in Schizophrenia.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
Vol. 9,
Issue. ,
Pate, John K
and
Goldwater, Sharon
2015.
Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 78,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Dell, Gary S.
and
Jacobs, Cassandra L.
2016.
Neurobiology of Language.
p.
209.
Kuperberg, Gina R.
and
Jaeger, T. Florian
2016.
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
NORCLIFFE, ELISABETH
and
JAEGER, T. FLORIAN
2016.
Predicting head-marking variability in Yucatec Maya relative clause production.
Language and Cognition,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
167.
Buz, Esteban
Tanenhaus, Michael K.
and
Jaeger, T. Florian
2016.
Dynamically adapted context-specific hyper-articulation: Feedback from interlocutors affects speakers’ subsequent pronunciations.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 89,
Issue. ,
p.
68.
Jaeger, T. Florian
and
Buz, Esteban
2017.
The Handbook of Psycholinguistics.
p.
38.
Hall, Kathleen Currie
Hume, Elizabeth
Jaeger, T. Florian
and
Wedel, Andrew
2018.
The role of predictability in shaping phonological patterns.
Linguistics Vanguard,
Vol. 4,
Issue. s2,
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2018.
Learning Language through Task Repetition.
Vol. 11,
Issue. ,
p.
311.
Ferreira, Victor S.
2019.
A Mechanistic Framework for Explaining Audience Design in Language Production.
Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Long, Madeleine
Moore, Isabelle
Mollica, Francis
and
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2021.
Contrast perception as a visual heuristic in the formulation of referential expressions.
Cognition,
Vol. 217,
Issue. ,
p.
104879.
Kuperberg, Gina R.
2021.
Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension.
Topics in Cognitive Science,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
256.
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2021.
Color discriminability makes over-specification efficient: Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
Morgan, Adam M.
and
Ferreira, Victor S.
2022.
Still no evidence for audience design in syntax: Resumptive pronouns are not the exception.
Journal of Memory and Language,
Vol. 127,
Issue. ,
p.
104368.
Target article
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Related commentaries (32)
A developmental perspective on the integration of language production and comprehension
An ecological alternative to a “sad response”: Public language use transcends the boundaries of the skin
Are forward models enough to explain self-monitoring? Insights from patients and eye movements
Cascading and feedback in interactive models of production: A reflection of forward modeling?
Communicative intentions can modulate the linguistic perception-action link
Does what you hear predict what you will do and say?
Evidence for, and predictions from, forward modeling in language production
Forward modelling requires intention recognition and non-impoverished predictions
How do forward models work? And why would you want them?
Inner speech as a forward model?
Integrate, yes, but what and how? A computational approach of sensorimotor fusion in speech
Intentional strategies that make co-actors more predictable: The case of signaling
Intermediate representations exclude embodiment
Is there any evidence for forward modeling in language production?
It ain't what you do (it's the way that you do it)
Memory and cognitive control in an integrated theory of language processing
Prediction in processing is a by-product of language learning
Prediction is no panacea: The key to language is in the unexpected
Prediction plays a key role in language development as well as processing
Predictive coding? Yes, but from what source?
Preparing to be punched: Prediction may not always require inference of intentions
Seeking predictions from a predictive framework
The complexity-cost factor in bilingualism
The neurobiology of receptive-expressive language interdependence
The poor helping the rich: How can incomplete representations monitor complete ones?
The role of action in verbal communication and shared reality
Toward a unified account of comprehension and production in language development
Towards a complete multiple-mechanism account of predictive language processing
What does it mean to predict one's own utterances?
What is the context of prediction?
When to simulate and when to associate? Accounting for inter-talker variability in the speech signal
“Well, that's one way”: Interactivity in parsing and production
Author response
Forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue