Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T14:34:57.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partner selection, coordination games, and group selection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

Michael S. Alvard
Michael S. Alvard*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4352. [email protected]://anthropology.tamu.edu/faculty/alvard/profile.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The process of partner selection reflects ethnographic realities where cooperative rewards obtain that would otherwise be lost to loners. Baumard et al. neglect frequency-dependent processes exemplified by games of coordination. Such games can produce multiple equilibria that may or may not include fair outcomes. Additional, group-selection processes are required to produce the outcomes predicted by the models.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 80 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D. (1991) What are transaction costs? Research in Law and Economics 14:1–18.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. (2001) Mutualistic hunting. In: The early human diet: The role of meat, ed. Stanford, C. & Bunn, H., pp. 261–78. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. (n.d.) Testing hypotheses about cooperation, conflict, and punishment in the artisanal FAD (fish aggregating device) fishery of the Commonwealth of Dominica.Google Scholar
Alvard, M. & Nolin, D. (2002) Rousseau's whale hunt? Coordination among big game hunters. Current Anthropology 43(4):533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, T. C. (2002) Evolution of social behavior: Individual and group selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(2):67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1990) Group selection among alternative evolutionarily stable strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 145(3):331–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2002) Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology 215(3):287–96.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2010) Transmission coupling mechanisms: Cultural group selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 365:3787–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ensminger, J. (1997) Transaction costs and Islam: Explaining conversion in Africa. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics/Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 153(1):4–29.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. A. & Doebeli, M. (2006) How altruism evolves: Assortment and synergy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19(5):1389–93.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J. A. & Doebeli, M. (2009) A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276(1654):13–19.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004) Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 53:3–35.Google Scholar
Letcher, J. A. & Doebeli, M. (2006) How altruism evolves: Assortment and synergy. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19(5):1389–93.Google Scholar
McElreath, R. E. A. (2008) Individual decision making and the evolutionary roots of institutions. In: Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions, ed. Singer, C. E. W., pp. 325–42. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Antal, T. (2010) Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences 365(1537):19–30.Google Scholar
Pepper, J. W. & Smuts, B. B. (2002) A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: Positive assortment through environmental feedback. American Naturalist 160(2):205–13.Google Scholar
Rankin, D. J. & Taborsky, M. (2009) Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution 63(7):1913–22.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (2004) The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. & Wilson, D. (1998) Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (2006) Reciprocal altruism: 30 years later. In: Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution, ed. Kappeler, P. & van Schaik, C., pp. 67–83. Springer.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. & Dugatkin, L. A. (1997) Group selection and assortative interactions. American Naturalist 149(2):336–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S. & Sober, E. (1994) Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(4):585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. P. (2003) The power of norms. In: Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation, ed. Hammerstein, P., pp. 389–99. MIT Press.Google Scholar