Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:03:26.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Not so fast, and not so easy: Essentialism doesn't emerge from a simple heuristic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Nick Braisby*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Social Work and Human Sciences, University of West London, London W5 5RF, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.uwl.ac.uk/about-us/how-university-works/biographies/professor-nick-braisby

Abstract

Cimpian & Salomon's (C&S's) proposal comes unstuck on precisely the claim that inherence is an heuristic, able to deliver simple, shallow outputs that are right most of the time. Instead, the inherence heuristic delivers outputs that imply it is not an heuristic after all, and is simply too fast and too easy a mechanism to do the job of explaining categorisations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eco, U. (1999) Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M. & the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, ed. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D., pp. 4981. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of man. Wiley.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5:207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar